Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

46% of trans people disabled, 52% neurodiverse.

55 replies

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 29/09/2021 22:33

I'm sure this has come up before - these figures are astonishing, but never seem to be explored in the reports. (This is from Trans Lives 2021 www.transactual.org.uk/trans-lives-21 )

I'm certain these numbers are way higher than in the general population?

Does being trans cause disabilities? Or why does being disabled make you more likely to be trans.

Surely these questions need to be answered rather than just pointed out and then ignored. I would be very interested to know if any of our trans readers have any insight into this?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Innocenta · 01/10/2021 20:36

@OrangeSamphire People absolutely do self-diagnose inappropriately with any number of things, including the differences normally considered part of the neurodiversity umbrella. I'm sure their reasons are many and varied, but I'm not sure how you could think this isn't happening.

Innocenta · 01/10/2021 20:34

@SuperLoudPoppingAction

Threads like this can sometimes be tough to read as an autistic MNer. Sometimes it seems like the kiwi farms attitude to autism rubs off on folk here.

However there is a big overlap between being autistic and central sensitivity syndromes (someone is researching this for a PhD just now - Sarah Grant - she presented at this year's Playing A Part).
So that would be things like fibromyalgia, ehler danlos etc.

So it is quite likely someone may be autistic and physically disabled.

And we know neurodivergent people are more likely to identify as trans or non binary.

I think it's more likely that being neurodivergent is the core factor here. Rather than being disabled making you more likely to be trans or vice versa.

Connective tissue disorders are not centralised sensitivity.
FlyingOink · 01/10/2021 08:35

@NecessaryScene

Clearly you're going to get remarkable results in any poll of "trans" people.

For starters (nearly) 100% claim to be in some way not the sex they actually are, so initial signs of reliability are poor.

In an attempted survey of benefits from childhood transition (Turban 2020), 73% of respondents said they'd had puberty blockers after the age of 18, so they just chucked those replies out.

Transwomen frequently claim to have period symptoms and to have difficulty opening jars.

They also repeatedly falsely claim that trans people were foundational in the gay rights movement.

And "feeling suicidal" and "suffering transphobia" are part of their group and self justification for getting everything they want, so for an individual to say they didn't would be letting the side down somewhat.

So clearly any self-reporting figures are going to be immensely unreliably.

All you can say is "46% of trans people claim to be disabled", but that no more makes the claim true than "99% of trans people claim to be the opposite sex".

Now, in reality, there certainly is a significant overlap between trans identities and various other conditions. Trans appears to be the current central hub that lots of disparate things latch on to. I can certainly believe the "neurodiverse" thing is higher than population average.

But you'd need proper non-self-reporting data to figure it out properly. It is a population of fantasists.

Spot on.
ClumpingBambooIsALie · 30/09/2021 17:33

@VampireBarbie

Lol at people identifying as neurodiverse, a person can't be neurodiverse, they can only be neurodivergent. If they can't even use accurate terms what's the point?

Self-identifying as something is not the same as actually being something, as we know.

I'm sure the "We are a DID system" crowd has members who identify as neurodiverse…
OrangeSamphire · 30/09/2021 15:23

I don’t disagree with you @AnyOldPrion but until access to diagnostic pathways is more readily available, self ID should not be invalidated.

And there is no help or advantage in being identified as autistic, formally or self ID’d. Maybe this is my social naivety showing but I can’t see why anyone would seek this out for themselves if it wasn’t truthful.

EmbarrassingAdmissions · 30/09/2021 12:22

If you do a questionaire on health care, who do you think will be the most likely to want to respond?

I think most posters who are advocates for decent evidence/data collection and analysis are aware of the substantial limitations of non-probabilistic data collection via surveys.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 30/09/2021 12:21

If you do a questionaire on health care, who do you think will be the most likely to want to respond?

It wasn't a questionnaire on healthcare. It was a general survey about the lives of trans people. Disability was just one of many demographic and thematic questions.

OP posts:
DisgustedofManchester · 30/09/2021 12:11

Am I the only one that read the report that talks about 46% people who responded to the request for opinions as having a disability and not of ALL trans people?

If you do a questionaire on health care, who do you think will be the most likely to want to respond? People that do not need to access healthcare?

Worldgonecrazy · 30/09/2021 11:04

Not sure if it is relevant but a large number of the non binary and younger ‘trans’ people are exactly the sort of young people who, 25 years ago, would have been getting into paganism and witchcraft, and 35 years ago would have been gothlings.

In my experience during those years, a very large proportion were what would now be called neurodiverse, some with very obvious autistic traits and others with Asperger traits, many with disabilities too.

The difference is that neither paganism or gothdom had long term physical effects. I will be very glad when those that don’t ‘fit’ into society find something less physically dangerous and less aggressive to cotton on to that the trans/NB path.

AnyOldPrion · 30/09/2021 10:21

@OrangeSamphire

I’m autistic and I also have an autistic daughter (both diagnosed).

Growing up autistic in a neurotypical-led world means your sense of identity can be almost entirely missing. We seek to belong but cannot find where and keep making social mistakes. We then isolate ourselves.

If the trans movement had been around when I was a teen I think I would have been extremely vulnerable to it. My daughter is. I’m glad she’s not in school because it is so dominant there.

Re self-identifying as autistic… the National Autistic Society supports it. There are many good reasons why a person may self-identify. Maybe there are some very lost individuals who have mistakenly self-identified but my bet would be they have other difficulties that may present in similar ways (PTSD, BPD) that means their outward presentation in the world and needs for support aren’t that different.

I think self-ID might be acceptable for some purposes, however there are times when accuracy is important and (in my opinion) an official diagnosis should be required.

There appears to be a rise in narcissistic traits at a societal level and an increasing number of people identifying into groups for personal benefit, rather than need. An obvious example would be male prisoners claiming they are women in order to be moved to women’s prisons, however it isn’t a new phenomenon. Earlier examples would include the PDSA which attempted to provide free veterinary care for all on low incomes who felt they needed it, but eventually had to introduce proof of receipt of certain benefits as more and more people self-identified as poverty stricken.

Where available help is limited, if allowed to, those people take away important resources from those in genuine need. I understand the generosity in including all who feel they need help, but unfortunately as the movement grows and it becomes known that advantage is available, those who use all such inform to their benefit will catch on and the situation will become untenable.

Artichokeleaves · 30/09/2021 09:46

Nitro excellent post. As a disabled person (actual, not able to identify out of it when it gets awkward or not fun any more) I agree with every word.

Statistics become meaningless once self ID gets involved.

Babdoc · 30/09/2021 09:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

Peanutsandchilli · 30/09/2021 09:11

My daughter is autistic and has expressed a wish to be treated like a boy. She's asked us to call her by male names, and wears a chest binder, but has never expressed a wish to take it further by having surgery or anything like that. I think (and it's difficult, because I can't engage her in conversation), that she didn't fit into the typical teenage female gender stereotype, and found it easier to be 'male'. I don't think she actually wants to be male. It's just the more appealing alternative for her. She did once ask me for testosterone treatment. I told her no because she was too young. She hasn't mentioned it since. She was always stereotypically female at primary school, but since she went to high school it all changed because she didn't follow the same path as her peers. She's still very dependant on me and somewhat childlike. She's 17.

I find it really difficult to comprehend. She picks up names from manga characters and uses them. They change, probably annually. She dresses in clothes that I would consider are targeted at girls, although tend to be loser fitting due to her sensory issues. She wears skirts and dresses occasionally.

I can't bring myself to refer to her as a boy, or use the names she chooses, because ultimately, I don't think it will actually help.

Soontobe60 · 30/09/2021 08:55

@WeeBisom

I’m also amazed at the stats like 80 percent of non binary people have experienced transphobia at work. I’d be curious to know what they mean by “transphobic” - the figures seem shockingly high.
It would be considered transphobic to use the ‘wrong’ pronouns, eg saying “can she please complete this task” to a supervisor about another employee who has decided they want to be called ‘non binary’, and is clearly female. It would be considered transphobic to direct a male, who has come into work on Monday morning and decided he is now female, to use the men’s toilets as per the law. Let’s be clear - what I’d consider to be transphobic, and what some TRAs would, are worlds apart!
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 30/09/2021 08:51

Would it not be quite easy to do some proper research on this. Surely doctors / GIDS would be able to say I have had x patients diagnosed with GD and diagnosed autism, GD and a diagnosed disability? Would Transactual not be better at lobbying for this to happen? It seems their survey is woefully flawed in all sorts of ways - surely good robust data on trans people is a good thing, and I don't understand why it hasn't been done? Basic stuff like knowing the prevalence of comorbidities surely isn't that hard?

OP posts:
andyoldlabour · 30/09/2021 08:48

dyslek

An extreme form of narcissism, which demands that the person is the centre of attention all the time, where the person will appropriate medical conditions and possibly invent situations where they wish to encourage synpathy from others.
Using their own fake vulnerability, they are able to access influential positions, then bully others into, for want of a better word, "worshipping" them, giving them a public voice, an unquestioning acceptance of whatever they say or do.

dyslek · 30/09/2021 08:48

@NiceGerbil

Identifying as having a disability on self diagnosis is prevalent now in some sections of society it seems.

Which really pisses me off personally.

Because.

In ye olden days the wording identity as having a disability was used for the same good reasons as identify ethnicity (I think it's usually called).

It was because not everyone with a disability, even one with significant impact on life, accepted that label for themselves. It was to be understanding that it was sensitive and if you didn't want to say yes you didn't have to. In things it was used for something other than equalities monitoring or similar. The questions would be specific about diagnosis, limitations etc. Eg some insurance, certain benefits applications (for all the good that did/ does) etc.

For ethnicity it was because it was another sensitive question. Someone born here with Irish parents and strong family connections in Ireland etc may identify as Irish. Similarly those of parents of different backgrounds may identify as one, the other, or as both. Iyswim.

The idea that a person would choose to ID as having a disability just didn't really occur to anyone and I doubt it happened much. Ditto a white person with v English background for years identifying as Chinese. I suspect that doesn't happen much but still.

The useful term identify as. Has been misused and bastardised as so much other stuff has. And it's original use for stats etc made meaningless.

But would not 'identify as' be the exact wrong wording. If someone has a condition, but does not feel that defines them or even thinks they dont infact have that condition (very common in some mental health conditions) then it should be something opposite as identifying as, as they do actually have the condition but dont identify as having it, iyswim?
dyslek · 30/09/2021 08:22

In my observation of people who pop up on here, Im talking about the cyclist for instance, or Amee Challonor or even big Steph or the person at the Labour Party conference claiming abuse in the loos, they all instantly strike me as Neurodiverse.
I think for people on the spectrum (and Im speaking as someone who may very well be on the spectrum myself) adopting an identity that others are forced to pay attention to must be very tempting when its difficult to fit in socially.

PenguindreamsofDraco · 30/09/2021 08:10

Can I just say that the image produced by that amazing turn of phrase "now watch my stim dance" has got me sniggering away on the train. Grin

NecessaryScene · 30/09/2021 07:30

I think, in time, it will come to be considered that there has been a huge over-diagnosis and it might be discovered there is no significant link between genuine gender dysphoria and a diagnosis of autism, rather that those with autism are perhaps caught up in the current wave, which may be due to a form of mass psychosis, rather than a true rise in severe gender dysphoria.

Yes, this seems very, very likely to me.

OrangeSamphire · 30/09/2021 07:21

I’m autistic and I also have an autistic daughter (both diagnosed).

Growing up autistic in a neurotypical-led world means your sense of identity can be almost entirely missing. We seek to belong but cannot find where and keep making social mistakes. We then isolate ourselves.

If the trans movement had been around when I was a teen I think I would have been extremely vulnerable to it. My daughter is. I’m glad she’s not in school because it is so dominant there.

Re self-identifying as autistic… the National Autistic Society supports it. There are many good reasons why a person may self-identify. Maybe there are some very lost individuals who have mistakenly self-identified but my bet would be they have other difficulties that may present in similar ways (PTSD, BPD) that means their outward presentation in the world and needs for support aren’t that different.

AnyOldPrion · 30/09/2021 06:48

Apologies, I still haven’t spelled out clearly my exact point.

We have no way of knowing whether there is a link with genuine severe cases of gender dysphoria - the original group for whom transition was a medical treatment carried out as a last resort. The 2021 Swedish study did look at links with psychiatric co-morbidity, which suggests that that was a significant factor they had noted. They don’t mention autism at all, though of course, it’s not possible to rule out the possibility that it have been overlooked.

The link with autism has been established only recently and as far as I am aware, has been noted as significant in young people. I think, in time, it will come to be considered that there has been a huge over-diagnosis and it might be discovered there is no significant link between genuine gender dysphoria and a diagnosis of autism, rather that those with autism are perhaps caught up in the current wave, which may be due to a form of mass psychosis, rather than a true rise in severe gender dysphoria.

AnyOldPrion · 30/09/2021 06:34

@timeisnotaline

I wouldn’t want to dismiss the autism and trans link just because someone did self identify. It’s pretty intuitive - what is I believe a reasonably common feature of autism is seeing the world in sets of rules which could include how each gender behaves so if that set behaviour doesn’t appeal to an autistic individual the feeling of discomfort can be stronger than an NT individual. Transitioning then seems like it relieves that feeling, as it’s another set of rules saying it’s ok to behave in the non gender conforming way you want to because you’re trans.

Very happy for someone more experienced to explain it much better and also happy to rephrase /redact anything not coming across right as I’m a complete layperson here.

If that’s aimed at me because I mentioned the fragrant Madigan, then I can only say that I was not intending in any way to suggest there was no link with genuine autism.

I believe it has been established by medics that young people with autism are more likely to consider themselves trans. I believe GIDS confirmed it, but also hadn’t bothered to quantify it or assess why there was a link and what it might signify.

However self-identifying as having autism is potentially almost as popular among young people as identifying as trans and there are obvious reasons for the overlap, particularly with relation to the huge wave of ROGD teens and also those who are likely claiming trans for reasons of narcissism.

So while there almost certainly is a genuine link between the current wave of transitioners and a diagnosis of autism, the figures in that survey are, I believe, worthless. They are almost certainly sought for reasons of propaganda and are likely harmful, rather than useful to those with severe gender dysphoria, who mostly make up the original group of people who transitioned. They are the people examined in the 2012 study I mentioned, which made no mention of a link.

NecessaryScene · 30/09/2021 06:18

Oh, absolutely, there is real evidence that autism in particular is massively overrepresented in the trans population.

But that data does not come from a self-reporting survey of people ticking the "neurodiverse" box. It's not 52%. But it is much higher than the general population.

I'd be more interested in seeing the reverse stat, which I haven't - what percentage of young people with an autism diagnosis have adopted some sort of "trans" identity.

timeisnotaline · 30/09/2021 06:14

I wouldn’t want to dismiss the autism and trans link just because someone did self identify. It’s pretty intuitive - what is I believe a reasonably common feature of autism is seeing the world in sets of rules which could include how each gender behaves so if that set behaviour doesn’t appeal to an autistic individual the feeling of discomfort can be stronger than an NT individual. Transitioning then seems like it relieves that feeling, as it’s another set of rules saying it’s ok to behave in the non gender conforming way you want to because you’re trans.

Very happy for someone more experienced to explain it much better and also happy to rephrase /redact anything not coming across right as I’m a complete layperson here.

Swipe left for the next trending thread