Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Emma Nicholson Webinar 11am today (Friday 24th September)

40 replies

NancyDrawed · 24/09/2021 10:56

twitter.com/baroness_nichol/status/1440986060864069633?s=21&fbclid=IwAR15Uv2iGZ9wgD4qA3HQJRQkPo9CyPZOb_kAH2OXSBfunC2Rs0qBVFnUt5Q

Link to register in the twitter thread.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/09/2021 09:53

Lord Wasserman says later in the recording that MPs wont put their heads above the parapet because they don't want to fall out with their children.

FFS

Veeta · 28/09/2021 09:05

Thanks for posting the link Ova. I was intending to look for this as I missed it live, but I’d totally forgotten to follow up. It’s a fantastic watch.

NecessaryScene · 28/09/2021 06:59

Bumping this, as I'm watching it and it is great.

Helen is furious. Quite rightly. (I think she almost swore, but stopped herself Grin)

OvaHere · 27/09/2021 21:33

Bumping for the evening crowd. Please have a watch especially the first video. Really informative discussion.

OvaHere · 27/09/2021 14:32

The videos of these webinars are now on YouTube.

Well worth watching.

oldwomanwhoruns · 25/09/2021 16:28

Yes yes, such a shame that Stephen Timms MP was only on a phone and had to leave.

He clearly has NO CLUE about the silencing of women's voices on the BBC, on this issue. And presumably he has no knowledge of the nonsense that the bBC are feeding children (I am Leo etc). If he had hung around a bit longer, our wonderful speakers might have been able to tell him what is going on.

I do hope that he watches the replay of the webinar?

EmbarrassingAdmissions · 25/09/2021 13:08

@Masdintle

Sorry it was Stephen Timms MP who didn't believe Posie. Glinner has put him right
Just wondering what Stephen Timms and the Right Rev whomever think today in the light of The Lancet 's cover about bodies with vaginas - or are they willing to disbelieve the evidence of their own eyes?

Anybody waiting for the sympathetic BBC or MSM coverage that explains to us why this is absolutely inclusive but there's no need to adopt comparable dehumanisation for men?

oldwomanwhoruns · 25/09/2021 08:24

The Lord Wasserman comment wasn't actually relating to MPs, it was about PCCs. He had had a meeting of Conservative PCCs. They said that they were under pressure from their children not to speak on this issue.

Yes the Baroness did say that they should not then be in parliament, and was corrected, but her point was so good. Lord Wasserman then said "We are in big trouble if the PCCs are unable to speak out".

Graham Linehan then rephrased it very well by saying "adults are being held hostage by their children. They need to stand up to their children. They are going to get women killed."

Quote may not be word perfect, it's from my notes. I noted it down as I'm trying to arrange a mtg with my PCC right now!!

PlayYouLikeAShark · 24/09/2021 23:42

"is it time to repeal the GRA for its unintended consequences for the rights of women and children."

This is a good site to read some reasons why repeal of the GRA should be looked at.

Link to website

Worth a read.

JoodyBlue · 24/09/2021 13:49

I watched it too. All the speakers are fantastic. This session in particular I thought Helen's speech was blistering. She spoke of her anger at people in safeguarding paid good money not doing their jobs. She talked of cowardice. I thougth she was really excellent. Lord Wasserman says later in the recording that MPs wont put their heads above the parapet because they don't want to fall out with their children. Emma says then they "have no business being in parliament". Such straight talking. Such a relief to hear. The minutes and recording usually go up on the website a few days after the meeting.childrenandwomenfirst.org/

JustcameoutGC · 24/09/2021 13:46

Thanks all. In my building we had a big Pride rainbow installation in the lobby. A few years ago it would have brought a huge smile to my face. Now, I see it as a symbol of coersion and oppression of women.

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 24/09/2021 13:43

Thanks for the youtube links. Glad I'll be able to catch up, these are important discussions.

Masdintle · 24/09/2021 13:36

The bit about question 3 about publicly-funded institutions displaying Pride flags and Stonewall stuff is that it's a political statement where they should be apolitical and completely neutral eg police and NHS. Makes people feel vulnerable approaching them as they may be judged transphobic and hounded or refused help

ChaToilLeam · 24/09/2021 13:34

Had to miss the second half, but the first part was superb. All these intelligent impassioned people speaking clearly and with consideration - no obfuscation, no exaggeration, no histrionics. This is the kind of clear headed discussion we need.

EmbarrassingAdmissions · 24/09/2021 13:30

PatsArrow did a better job, I should have refreshed after looking through my notes.

EmbarrassingAdmissions · 24/09/2021 13:29

@JustcameoutGC

I missed her 3 questions. What were they?
I paraphrase:

1 As the GRA was passed for particular purposes (to allow same sex marriage, I don't think she mentioned pensions) and that is now available, is it time to repeal the GRA for its unintended consequences for the rights of women and children.

2 Language. If captured organisations like the BBC refuse to acknowledge woman: adult human female except to call it a controversial statement, and police forces and the press abide by self-identity to record crimes, then how can we have a public discussion that everybody understands.

3 De-integrating Stonewall and the influence of lobby groups from captured institutions like the NHS, the House of Lords, the judiciary in the form of training and the ETBB etc.

Mollyollydolly · 24/09/2021 13:28

@vivariumvivariumsvivaria

I missed it, had to work. Where does the recording go?
Emma now has a YouTube page. Not sure when they go online. m.youtube.com/channel/UCXIVBTjzbirIGJ37551MI4Q
PatsArrow · 24/09/2021 13:25

I can't remember her exact phrasing but it was (please someone correct me if I'm wrong).

1/ When are Parliament going to debate repealing the GRA? It is no longer fit for purpose.

2/ when are politicians going to get brave and start using language that reflects reality? 'Cis ' woman etc has seeped into everyday language. This lead onto discussion about language used in legal cases (raped women being made to refer to their rapists as women if thats was the rapists wishes etc) Media language and reporting etc.

3/ When will Parliament look into how ALL our public institutions are displaying and promoting the political symbols of the Pride colours? Posie argued that the Pride colours have become synonymous with her feeling that they do not support women or children (not great when encountering them do prominently all over a hospital for example)

The questions all prompted huge discussion.

Mollyollydolly · 24/09/2021 13:25

Hope this one goes online soon, missed the second half had to go out and pick the dog up. It was really good. One of the things that makes me bloody furious is that all these good, intelligent, compassionate people are called bigots. It's unbelievable.

JustcameoutGC · 24/09/2021 13:12

I missed her 3 questions. What were they?

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 24/09/2021 13:12

I missed it, had to work. Where does the recording go?

dianebrewster · 24/09/2021 13:10

@Masdintle

The Bish doesn't get it. Beeeee kiiiiinnnnddd
interesting - I didn't hear it like that, (I used to work for a Bishop!) he very clearly talked about the starting point being the most vulnerable - and cited the vulnerability of women and children and contrasted that with the small number making a lot of noise. He did not repeat the be kind mantra. I'll be interested to see the recording and check my memory on that one.
PatsArrow · 24/09/2021 13:06

Amazing Webinar. The best yet. Everyone spoke well but Helen Joyce and Posie stood out for me. Posie has that ability to put things simply and cut through a lot of crap. Her 3 questions (just 3!) really struck a chord with everyone.

JustcameoutGC · 24/09/2021 13:04

Yeah, the bish needs a few tweets inviting him to suck lady dick, and then we'll see.

Masdintle · 24/09/2021 13:02

The Bish doesn't get it. Beeeee kiiiiinnnnddd