Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Gay man 'bullied' off Manchester Pride for wearing LGB Alliance hat and t-shirt

963 replies

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 29/08/2021 08:21

LibDem activist delighted by this. Here are two of her tweets. The gay man who turned up in an LGB hat and t-shirt was allegedly advised by police to leave for his own safety and seems to have had the hat stolen.

Another young fool tweeted that 'bullying the guy in the LGB Alliance shirt who came to the protest march is my favourit part of Pride so far xx'. He has since deleted this (possibly because he is now sober and/or has seen how many people had reported this to his employers) and now claims he was just chanting 'Trans lives matter!'. 'Bullying' is an odd choice of words for this. How could anyone think admitting publicly to 'bullying' was a good look?

The LGB Alliance man has been advised that people shouting at him is actually assault if he wants to take it further. Doesn't sound like he does, though.

Unedifying, to say the least.

Gay man 'bullied' off Manchester Pride for wearing LGB Alliance hat and t-shirt
Gay man 'bullied' off Manchester Pride for wearing LGB Alliance hat and t-shirt
OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
FloralBunting · 30/08/2021 14:45

Who has removed this right? Is it illegal to be same-sex attracted? Is it even mainstream within LGBT circles that one can't be same-sex attracted? It certainly isn't in mine. And not a single trans person I know thinks that it's transphobic or wrong to be same-sex attracted. Where has this view come from?

Are you serious? In a large field of evidence, lets just pick the most recent public example - Lil Nas X said he was definitely gay becauise he liked dick and got a slew of abuse for saying he was being transphobic. I mean, good for you if you've never come across any of the discourse talked about in this article, but it's happening.

lesbianandgaynews.com/2021/08/kay-knight-the-shaming-of-homosexuals-for-having-sex/

Ereshkigalangcleg · 30/08/2021 14:45

Allison Bailey being accused of transphobia, opposing GRA reform, opposing gender self-id in the census, engaging with EHRC on gender vs sex, opposing aspects of Scottish hate crime legislation to do with sex vs gender).

Allison Bailey is taking her Chambers and Stonewall to court for allegedly illegally discriminating against her as a lesbian who was outspoken on lesbian's rights. The pre-hearing has already happened. Stonewall tried and failed to get it dropped. But apparently there is a reasonable prospect of success.

yourhairiswinterfire · 30/08/2021 14:42

And what special privileges are trans people asking for?

For a start, there are convicted sex offenders and rapists housed with women in prison right now, because the rapists claim they are women.

A woman who was sexually assaulted in prison took this to court. The MoJ think the risk of women being raped or sexually assaulted when locked up is worth it to spare the feelings of transwomen who have been convicted of rape or sexual assault.

Being given access to imprisoned, vulnerable women when you're a male predator because you say some magic words, is a privilege, not a human right. It's a privilege that activists and lobby groups campaigned for. This is what they wanted.

plodalong12 · 30/08/2021 14:42

I urge you to look at their website, then, where the only six campaigns they list are all to do with trans issues and sex/gender issues ("transing the gay away", Allison Bailey being accused of transphobia, opposing GRA reform, opposing gender self-id in the census, engaging with EHRC on gender vs sex, opposing aspects of Scottish hate crime legislation to do with sex vs gender

I literally copied and pasted from their website, and provided a link, on the previous page on this thread. Not one of the points mentions trans

JustPassingThrough3 · 30/08/2021 14:42

@RedDogsBeg

Which rights does reducing gender clinic waiting times or counselling waiting times remove from me?

Why should a group set up for L, G & B campaign for that?

I've not said they should? The prior poster said that trans activists are threatening LGB rights. I asked how reducing gender clinic and counselling waiting times (i.e. what trans activists want) threatens my rights as a gay person.
merrymouse · 30/08/2021 14:41

And not a single trans person I know thinks that it's transphobic or wrong to be same-sex attracted. Where has this view come from?

Google ‘cotton ceiling’.

Think about the very large number of people included in the trans umbrella.

Think about men who don’t believe a woman who says no.

JustPassingThrough3 · 30/08/2021 14:41

@Theeyeballsinthesky

Eh? The one thing the LGBA don’t do is focus on trans issues Confused
I urge you to look at their website, then, where the only six campaigns they list are all to do with trans issues and sex/gender issues ("transing the gay away", Allison Bailey being accused of transphobia, opposing GRA reform, opposing gender self-id in the census, engaging with EHRC on gender vs sex, opposing aspects of Scottish hate crime legislation to do with sex vs gender).
RedDogsBeg · 30/08/2021 14:40

Which rights does reducing gender clinic waiting times or counselling waiting times remove from me?

Why should a group set up for L, G & B campaign for that?

plodalong12 · 30/08/2021 14:40

@JustPassingThrough3
Oh, and as a gay man, I hope that you’re open to engaging in penis in vagina “front hole” sex, otherwise you might find yourself being called a bigot…or far worse:

photos.google.com/share/AF1QipN6bUPUugEzmNmC-nZTunsVPUtgAuMANMmoVSD1j5gmROqY5E53VSCukHKc8zSRHA?key=bTMzMDNKeC1vbkFkRjlqTHJKM284RU1IQ3JkSlF3&pli=1

JustPassingThrough3 · 30/08/2021 14:39

@FloralBunting

I've been homophobically assaulted, JustPassing and I disagree with you. He was attacked for wearing a logo of a charity specifically for LGB people. That is a homophobic attack. Just because you personally think an LGB organization should only have a focus you agree with doesn't change that.
Would it be a homophobic assault for someone to shout at someone wearing a Stonewall hat?
Theeyeballsinthesky · 30/08/2021 14:38

Eh? The one thing the LGBA don’t do is focus on trans issues Confused

JustPassingThrough3 · 30/08/2021 14:38

@RedDogsBeg

combatting homophobia in the workplace, etc.

How can you combat homophobia anywhere when you remove the right of people to be same sex attracted?

I simply don't see that improving access for trans people to health services, making it easier for those who wish to to transition, and allowing trans people to adopt their chosen identity without having to undergo medical treatment infringes upon my rights as a gay person.

Well good for you, how nice to be able to dismiss the negative effect it has on others because I'm alright, Jack.

Who has removed this right? Is it illegal to be same-sex attracted? Is it even mainstream within LGBT circles that one can't be same-sex attracted? It certainly isn't in mine. And not a single trans person I know thinks that it's transphobic or wrong to be same-sex attracted. Where has this view come from?
Ereshkigalangcleg · 30/08/2021 14:38

I am saying that their "prioritising looking after lesbians" isn't in improving access to healthcare, reducing homophobia in society, or doing anything that substantively improves their lives (or my life as a gay man) – it is simply focusing on trans issues.

But they think that gender identity ideology is homophobic in and of itself. Are you attracted to FTM trans people, as a gay man?

FloralBunting · 30/08/2021 14:38

I've been homophobically assaulted, JustPassing and I disagree with you. He was attacked for wearing a logo of a charity specifically for LGB people. That is a homophobic attack. Just because you personally think an LGB organization should only have a focus you agree with doesn't change that.

GromblesofGrimbledon · 30/08/2021 14:38

[quote JustPassingThrough3]@GromblesofGrimbledon: Do you honestly think that this is more harmful to gay and lesbian and bi people than poor access to LGB health services, or homophobia in the workplace or in society, or a whole host of other genuine barriers to equality?

As a gay man, I really truly do not see how making it easier for trans people to simply live their lives erodes my rights as a gay man. Which rights does reducing gender clinic waiting times or counselling waiting times remove from me?

And what special privileges are trans people asking for?[/quote]

I don't see why people think they can police what others see as the most pressing issues they want to campaign for.

TRAs are fighting for rights when they already have the same human rights afforded to them as anyone else.

Of course, this is not good enough. They want children to be allowed to self-ID without parental consent. A move currently being pushed here in Scotland by the SNP. They demand access to "healthcare" which amounts to cosmetic surgery when other people are waiting in the same queues of a crippled NHS for life-saving treatment and surgeries. They throw around bogus statistics of suicide. They demand access to women's spaces: refuges, rape crises centres, domestic abuse shelters, changing rooms, etc. When women fight to keep these spaces they are branded bigots.

Trans "rights" are in direct conflict with the rights of other groups and they are not willing to budge or compromise. They have no interest in campaigning for third spaces and would rather push and push and push into the spaces of others who now find themselves clawing back what they once had.

JustPassingThrough3 · 30/08/2021 14:37

Several posters on here seem to think that I support Stonewall and that it's an either/or situation. As it happens, I don't agree with a lot of what Stonewall have done recently (and, importantly, they don't definitively define what the definition of 'gay' or 'lesbian' or whatever is).

If you disagree with Stonewall, it doesn't mean you have to agree with LGB Alliance. I would love an organisation that actually grapples with the real issues gay and lesbian and bi people actually face, without thinking that it has to be a battle against people who want to improve, for example, access to trans healthcare services.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 30/08/2021 14:36

It is homophobic to redefine same sex attraction to same gender attraction & then shout, bully & harass gay men who don’t want to have sex with transmen on account of them being female & not biological men

Quite.

merrymouse · 30/08/2021 14:36

allowing trans people to adopt their chosen identity

This is the problem.

Nobody needs rights because of an identity which is an amorphous subjective concept.

However people really do need specific rights and services because of sex. (I can explain more if you can’t think of an example).

Because of this it is essential that legislation and policy recognise sex.

I honestly don’t understand why this is a difficult point for people to grasp. I do understand that trans people find reference to their sex distressing, but that doesn’t mean it is right or harmless to insist that trans women are women in all situations, or to silence any discussion of gender.

JustPassingThrough3 · 30/08/2021 14:35

@Fitt

Your point about the effort involved in setting it up is of no relevance to discussing what their aims are.

So your unfound exaggeration has now switched to a complaint about aims?

I'm never in a million years going to pretend that a gender identity makes a man a lesbian, and it's therefore a legitimate aim of a new charity begining with L to reach out and support women damaged by the past decade of charity work that has mandated quite abusively that I must.

You are a man on a feminist chat board moaning about two lesbians prioritising looking after lesbians. Maybe there's other places you can whine about not being at the front of the queue.

I have been complaining about their aims all along. That is the ground on which I say it is controversial.

I am saying that their "prioritising looking after lesbians" isn't in improving access to healthcare, reducing homophobia in society, or doing anything that substantively improves their lives (or my life as a gay man) – it is simply focusing on trans issues. That is inherently controversial at the moment.

plodalong12 · 30/08/2021 14:35

[quote JustPassingThrough3]@Quaggersx: I'm sorry but that is just absurd. He was shouted at for supporting an organisation whose views and campaigns and focus people disagree with – not because he was gay. It was not homophobia, unless the definition has radically changed since I was last called a slur in the street.[/quote]
He was shouted at - and assaulted - for supporting an organisation that supports gay, lesbian and bisexual (and trans) people who are same SEX (not gender) attracted. It is woke homophobia. If you’re too blind, or unwilling, to see it, that’s your choice. However, the fact remains that a gay man was assaulted at gay pride for supporting a charity that supports gay people. In 2021.

As an aside, do you think Trans Pride and trans charities are homophobic for not cantering gay people?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 30/08/2021 14:35

The video showed a man (gay man, straight man, whatever)

Justpassingthrough

Please stop being so disingenuous. Can you manage to make whatever point you imagine you have to make without it? The video was homophobic because the man was showing that he supports the LGB Alliance, and as has already been discussed at length in this 700 odd post thread that you just happened upon, the LGB Alliance are a registered charity catering for lesbian, gay and bisexual people who don't agree that gender identity issues should be lumped together with sexual orientation by default and that LGB people can't advocate on their own behalf without the unrelated issues of the T taking priority, as they often do. Much like gender critical feminists don't believe gender identity issues should be the focus of feminism/women's rights.

JustPassingThrough3 · 30/08/2021 14:33

@GromblesofGrimbledon: I certainly agree with you that it was too aggressive and I don't support that aspect of it. But there has to be a distinction between aggressive behaviour and "homophobic assault". This was not the latter. It makes a mockery of those of us who have been homophobically assaulted to say so.

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 30/08/2021 14:33

@JustPassingThrough3

This whole debacle is utterly perplexing to me.

The video showed a man (gay man, straight man, whatever) being shouted at by gay men and women at a Pride march because he was wearing the logo of a controversial group. He was told that he was not welcome because of his views, and was subjected to a shout of "trans lives matter". None of them touched him.

On Twitter, people have contorted this into "mostly straight people have homophobically assaulted a gay man at Pride, because he is gay".

As a gay man – how on earth did the former come from the latter? It is totally contradictory to the evidence I have seen.

A controversial group?

So, are you saying he was asking to be assaulted, based on what he was wearing?

This is a twitter statement from the man.

I wasn't "kicked out of @ManchesterPride". Still very much attending and welcomed. Police acted proportionately in the face of assault and theft. Officer advised to report the incident by calling 101 and action was to protect me. Police don't take sides and didn't here.

I was assaulted and property damaged. Was entirely peaceful and respectful of everyone’s rights and personal space. The police were exceptional and professional, clear it was for my personal safety.

Someone grabbed his hat off his head before the police escorted him away from the mob. Unless trans activists have telekinesis, someone clearly touched him, didn't they?

JustPassingThrough3 · 30/08/2021 14:33

@NecessaryScene

I myself am a gay man and don't understand how the actions of the people in Manchester were "homophobic". It was not a comment on the sexuality of the person in the video.

If someone was harrassed or assaulted for waving a rainbow flag or trans flag, would you accept that was homophobic/transphobic?

Or would you insist there was no evidence of that - that they were just being hassled for being part of a controversial group?

The rainbow flag is simply a catch-all symbol of being gay or lesbian or bi or whatever. So yes, it would be homophobic, because it goes directly to their sexuality, not to their views. If someone shouted at someone for wearing a Stonewall cap or an LGB Alliance cap, though, it would not be homophobic.
RedDogsBeg · 30/08/2021 14:32

combatting homophobia in the workplace, etc.

How can you combat homophobia anywhere when you remove the right of people to be same sex attracted?

I simply don't see that improving access for trans people to health services, making it easier for those who wish to to transition, and allowing trans people to adopt their chosen identity without having to undergo medical treatment infringes upon my rights as a gay person.

Well good for you, how nice to be able to dismiss the negative effect it has on others because I'm alright, Jack.