Link to Companies House
I'm wondering what the implications of this are?
This person is/was (?) a "Management/strategy consultant" who "advised the Founder & CEO on strategy and organisation".
Was this director involved in suggesting the FWR board should be split as part of the 'strategy advice'? Was this 'strategy advice' in any way linked to discussions or negotiations to sign on as a director of the Good Law Project? Was MN fully aware of the intention of a director to take on another directorship that I'd struggle to describe as benign or neutral, given the USP here is targeted litigation & campaigning (including attacking the charitable status of an LGB organisation)? What now for women who have opinions that men disagree with?
If there's a case brewing to sue MN, I think this could prove to be an 'interesting' move.