Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Gay men being subject to abuse for their sexuality

546 replies

secular111 · 07/08/2021 19:48

Or Homophobia as we know it.

The belief that the trans-activists would stop by just attacking lesbians turns out to have been a miscalculation; gay men are a target now, and the community is only just starting to wake-up to the threat it is facing.

Woke Homophobia

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
TheWeeDonkey · 08/08/2021 15:57

Not exactly, but I don't believe sexuality is strictly defined by genitals, gametes, or chromosomes either.

So you think sexuality is not defined by sex?

Please, continue. It's lovely to see you show your whole arse.

Chickenyhead · 08/08/2021 15:52

[quote BluebirdsSong]@Artichokeleaves
"If you cannot have a sexuality that excludes people of the opposite sex, you cannot be homosexual."

Didn't you have that entire Super-Straight / Super-Gay stunt? Just go with that. It gets your point across while also clearly communicating to us who to shun/avoid.[/quote]
Oh so you will respect THAT boundary, yes?

All we all need to do is change our language again, to suit you.

I'm super Bisexual. Does this count?

You do make me giggle.

Jorrris · 08/08/2021 15:52

Not exactly, but I don't believe sexuality is strictly defined by genitals, gametes, or chromosomes either.

And that's why you're in such a muddle with it all :-)

NecessaryScene · 08/08/2021 15:51

Didn't you have that entire Super-Straight / Super-Gay stunt? Just go with that.

Would be great. Shame your lot banned the subreddit and managed to get the rape centre fundraiser scrapped. Hmm

Bigots.

Jorrris · 08/08/2021 15:51

Didn't you have that entire Super-Straight / Super-Gay stunt? Just go with that. It gets your point across while also clearly communicating to us who to shun/avoid

Just popping your pronouns on your account generally helps people to know who to avoid. :-)

FloralBunting · 08/08/2021 15:50

It really is a delight to have someone openly saying that homosexuals should be shunned.

BluebirdsSong · 08/08/2021 15:50

@TheWeeDonkey

Do you believe that sexuality is a choice?
Not exactly, but I don't believe sexuality is strictly defined by genitals, gametes, or chromosomes either.
TableFlowerss · 08/08/2021 15:50

@Whatsnewpussyhat

Yes, it's funny that in the UK, the legally protected characteristic of sexual orientation is so quickly forgotten to appease another group's ideology.
This
BluebirdsSong · 08/08/2021 15:48

@Artichokeleaves
"If you cannot have a sexuality that excludes people of the opposite sex, you cannot be homosexual."

Didn't you have that entire Super-Straight / Super-Gay stunt? Just go with that. It gets your point across while also clearly communicating to us who to shun/avoid.

FloralBunting · 08/08/2021 15:44

It feels more than a little like it has the possibility for coercion into unwelcome participation in sexual activities.

surely not! 😐

EmbarrassingAdmissions · 08/08/2021 15:42

@FloralBunting

Everyone must be open to the possibility of shagging anyone.

That's the new progressive dogma, or some shit.

It feels more than a little like it has the possibility for coercion into unwelcome participation in sexual activities.
Chickenyhead · 08/08/2021 15:34

Ohhh

No, I am Bi, not Pan.

They are different.

And I wouldn't date a trans person, same as I wouldn't date anyone with an ideology I didn't believe was healthy or based on fact. I wouldn't date an anti-vax, a flat earther or anyone particularly religious.

It's called choice.

EishetChayil · 08/08/2021 15:30

Insistintence on sexuality being trans-exclusionary? Yes.

Well then, roll me in sugar and call me trans-exclusionary. Call me a bigot. Call me a TERF. I am so past caring.

It's like being called a communist in the McCarthy era. Utterly devoid of meaning.

FloralBunting · 08/08/2021 15:29

Everyone must be open to the possibility of shagging anyone.

That's the new progressive dogma, or some shit.

TheWeeDonkey · 08/08/2021 15:28

Sorry that question was for BluebirdSong

EmbarrassingAdmissions · 08/08/2021 15:28

@Chickenyhead

What is wrong with being bisexual?

Have I missed something?

The sexual part of the word it seems - which is why there is the push to say bi rather than bisexual .

Apparently, the only acceptable orientation is pansexual (as per Layla Moran) but it seems inconsistent that the latter part of that is still OK.

TheWeeDonkey · 08/08/2021 15:27

Do you believe that sexuality is a choice?

Artichokeleaves · 08/08/2021 15:27

And that's before we look at the absolute out there weirdness of informing someone who they can and cannot sleep with, and insisting they have sexual relations with people they are not attracted to for.... well, social justice reasons.

RedDogsBeg · 08/08/2021 15:27

@DisgustedofManchester

I read a lot of those posts and a lot of them seem perfectly fine, unless you think sexuality and assigned biology are forever linked and unbreakable, which would be daft otherwise we would all be cisgender heterosexuals.
What a load of daftness.

Biology is not 'assigned'.

Homosexuality is clearly defined in Law.

Heterosexuality is clearly defined in Law.

Both are defined by sex, sex does not change.

Wtf are cisgender heterosexuals?

Actually, don't bother answering that as it will no doubt be more risible nonsense like biology being assigned.

MondayYogurt · 08/08/2021 15:27

@Dozer

Wondering if/when people will challenge straight men on their sexual preferences!
They never @ any of these mystical cishet evildoers tho...
Gay men being subject to abuse for their sexuality
Artichokeleaves · 08/08/2021 15:26

If you cannot have a sexuality that excludes people of the opposite sex, you cannot be homosexual.

You can't make both things true. Either you accept homosexual people have the right to be homosexual - which excludes all people of the opposite sex - or you don't. Which would make you homophobic.

BluebirdsSong · 08/08/2021 15:23

@TheWeeDonkey

Do you think trans people are in fact interested in dating transphobic bigots?

Homosexuality is now bigotry?

I don't think you're supposed to say that part out loud.

Homosexuality itself, no. Insistintence on sexuality being trans-exclusionary? Yes.
Deliriumoftheendless · 08/08/2021 15:23

@DisgustedofManchester

I read a lot of those posts and a lot of them seem perfectly fine, unless you think sexuality and assigned biology are forever linked and unbreakable, which would be daft otherwise we would all be cisgender heterosexuals.
How would that stop people being lesbian? Or gay? Or bi?
Dozer · 08/08/2021 15:21

Wondering if/when people will challenge straight men on their sexual preferences!

FloralBunting · 08/08/2021 15:21

[quote BluebirdsSong]@FloralBunting
You think momosexual is a slur??
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monosexuality[/quote]
I think you are promoting homophobia. I think you are calling homosexuals names and trying to shame us for rejecting the opposite sex.

I have no respect for the open bigotry you are vomiting out all over FWR today.

Swipe left for the next trending thread