Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Some thoughts on trans, the media and society

410 replies

Nefelibata33 · 01/08/2021 01:21

Hello everyone, I'm starting a new thread, cos I posted this message on a thread about Dr Helen Webberley, but people said they didn't want to discuss it, cos the thread was specifically about Dr Webberley. So I thought I would post my message for everyone to see, in a new thread. I think it's worth reading, I would like to discuss things with people. If you want to say something, please do. I will talk to anyone. Abuse me if you want, but I'd prefer if you didn't. I couldn't give a sh*t tbh. Sending love xxx. Here's my original message below

Hi everyone.

Just a post to say something. Firstly, if you are really concerned about big pharma, check that the NHS is in league with big pharma, and they dish out drugs like they're smarties. I have no idea what state you may be in, but you may have experience of this. I find it totally scary that so many people are getting hooked on drugs, cos a doctor prescribed it. This really isn't ok. As an example, a few years ago, they changed the blood sugar reading for which you can be described as diabetic. So more people could be diagnosed as diabetic, and more people could be given diabetic meds, and hey... a GP gets a bonus every time they diagnose someone as diabetic. I think the NHS is great, the nurses who are ready to sacrifice their own lives to help others, like Florence Nightingale. Like my Grandma. Like one of my cousins. But the ones who sit in offices and dish out drugs, they are a real problem.

Why am I saying this? Because doctors will dish out every drug going, even when they have horrendous side effects, make people actually feel worse than they were to begin with. Do we hear anything about this in the media? No. It doesn't sell papers. Any sort of backlash against big pharma? No. Because the media are onside with the mega rich pharmaceutical company directors getting richer and the poor getting poorer, not that the media would say that. Is there a type of drug doctors aren't allowed to dish out? Yes, oestrogen or testosterone.

This is the only thing no doctor can prescribe. There are plenty of countries around the world that take a different approach to trans people, and it's not so difficult to get hormones. With no disasters taking place. Keira Bell got a lot of attention. One person that made a mistake, amongst the thousands of trans kids who are happy as they are. One person. The media made a big deal of it.

Would it be wrong if I said that the media in this country have an axe to grind against any minority group? The Sun carried out a massive racist hate campaign against Raheem Sterling a few years ago. Britain's most prominent black footballer, it wasn't racist at all. You saw the racist abuse thing after England didn't win the Euros. It's absolutely shameful that so many people think it's OK to send someone death threats, JUST BECAUSE THEIR SKIN IS A DIFFERENT COLOUR. Encouraged by the Sun. The tabloids are the cancer of this country, our society would be much better without them I think, but we're stuck with them. They killed Princess Diana. A woman who was in the prime of her life, so happy, and bang... killed by the tabloids. There was a massive outpouring of emotion, but did it stop anyone from buying the tabloids? No. Nobody learns. I've read on this site, all this woke this woke that. Prince Harry has been accused of being woke. Cos he married a mixed race woman, and he doesn't want her to end up like his Mum. Think about it. Not "woke", a loving human being.

I don't get the woke thing. It's just a word that has been invented to describe someone who cares for social justice, and is right on. Can someone please explain to me why that's so bad? I really don't get it. Why are kind people a problem? Could it be, that there are just a lot of people who aren't very kind?

Back onto the media, they are totally corrupt, lying bullshtters. GB News is really struggling, so to boost ratings, they decided to attack the Trans community. To boost ratings! I guess that's more entertaining for the sort of people who watch it. I am now going to say something. I don't care who you are, but just realise this. Trans people are being treated just like gays were 20 or 30 years ago. The media do this to sell papers, and make money. Rupert Murdoch is Australian, he's an immigrant, but his papers bang on about immigration. Fcking hypocrite. The demonisation of Trans people is just part of a large scale war by the right wing/neo nazi movement. Are any of you reading this wondering now? It's part of a nazi thing. Caring for children is one thing, but demonising a group of people who just happened to be so unlucky that they were born in the wrong body is another. Have a heart, people. No transgender person wants to hurt you, or your children. They are not dangerous to anyone, the women's toilets, shelters, changing rooms in clothes shops... This is the truth. You don't get the truth in the papers. The papers don't have anyone's best interest at heart, they are just trying to make money.

I've said what I needed to say. I came on Mumsnet cos I'd heard of it, and I wanted to see how people think. I've received quite a bit of abuse off people, quite nasty, and some questions about my level of intelligence. Don't worry, I'm intelligent, and I won't stoop to the level of insulting someone else for being different, or having different opinions.

I am a feminist. There, I said it. I would die to protect a woman. So how come so many so called feminists are against Trans women? Do you actually believe a Trans woman is going to rape you in the toilets? NEWS! Trans women don't hurt or kill women, MEN DO. Trans women are not men. No Trans woman wants to hurt you. It's just the sort of fcked up shtbag men that want to hurt you.

If anyone wants to comment on anything I wrote, feel free. Make it intelligent, no gratuitous abuse please X

OP posts:
Theeyeballsinthesky · 01/08/2021 15:43

Well colour me shocked that the 2 men on the thread agree with each other about women having an easy life with allll the choices!!! 🙄

Datingandnoideahowto · 01/08/2021 15:43

@SourAppleChew I’m now a high earner. I used to be in a minimum wage job.

The minimum wage job that paid next to nothing was a million times more stressful than the very well paid job I now do.

Just FYI.

Chickenyhead · 01/08/2021 15:41

ODFOD Sour.

A bunch of women making stuff up in the equivalent of a dick swinging thread is evidence of nothing. Look at ONS stats for raw data.

I have worked since I was 13. That's 35 years now, I don't retire til past 65. I am single now but even with my DP I earned twice his wage.

I never had any choice but to work. I've done all types of jobs through university. I've paid my own way.

On the other hand my mum was what you would call a kept woman. She was trapped at home for her entire life bringing up his 8 children, whilst he was in the pub every night with his friends getting pissed.

My dad couldn't even find his own socks, make a cup of tea, or a sandwich. She was a slave to the day she died after 68 years of ownership.

She had a night job for a short while but he stopped it. She never had nice clothes, make up or anything for herself in those 68 years. He resented paying £800 for her hearing aide because she never worked. I told her not to get one, because who wants to listen to a misogynistic wanker shout at her all day.

You are like my dad. He resented women too.

Artichokeleaves · 01/08/2021 15:40

'Good people' agree?

Good grief.

Moral value is measured by compliance apparently.

RedDogsBeg · 01/08/2021 15:39

@Nefelibata33

Thank you SourAppleChew, finally someone agreed with something I said. You're a good person
How very telling.
Artichokeleaves · 01/08/2021 15:38

@SourAppleChew

Ok, last post about the patriarchy as I'm seriously derailing now.

Read the below collection of quotes which another poster collected from the SAHM thread and ask yourself how many of them could've been written by a man.

My sil is 44, rich and has NEVER had a job, lucky her! She has no trouble filling her day and has a great life.

Dp earns the money then gives it to me. Why would I feel oppressed?

I haven't worked in 8 years and bloody love it! I got to go shopping without ds today and have a long lunch with a friend. Going to the gym now.

My friend is married to the son of a billionaire and sometimes I have to block her on social media because her life is one long holiday.

I dont work, I was able to be a sahm with my sons, both in 30s now. I lunch, dressmake, walk my dogs for miles, spend time with friends and family etc....
I also volunteer for a small homeless charity, something I am so passionate about, being literally close to home.
I feel totally fulfilled!

My DSis married a very high earner and has never worked a day in her life.

My DH works 80 hours a week for a signficant amount of money, which allows me to be a SAHM and indulge myself, allow me to do all of my volunteering and my hobbies.

I work just a few hours a week in a job I love doing, I don’t have to work for financial reasons. I’ve accidentally ended up with a really high earning DH. I enjoy having lots of time to myself, I have hobbies, an amazing spa membership and an extremely fortunate to have some really good friends whom I’m able to see nearly every week.

My SIL is lucky enough to not have to work due to DB’s income. She has nice things, goes out for lots of lunches.

I'm a SAHM who has teenage children and is fortunate to be married to a high earner so I haven't needed to work since having kids. We do have a lifestyle that most people would find impressive.

I choose not to work. DH works really long shifts and odd hours so can be out of the house either days or nights, with each week being different. When the kids are grown I'll go and get some post-sahm work. Maybe in a shop, factory, cafe or something similar.

The funniest post was Monday morning when she started by posting “it’s going to be a long week, hoping the nanny isn’t late” followed by “anyone know a place I can get nails done, not happy with the place I’ve been going as I think they overcharge and wanting a day to pamper myself a bit.”

I feel lucky that I don't need to work. I am not getting any benefits because dh earns enough.

I'm lucky in that I didn't have to carry on working.

I am lucky enough not to work and stay at home with my son, as DH is a high earner. I feel extremely grateful for this every day, and try very hard not to take it for granted.

You resent women who are privileged enough to choose not to work. Got it. Personally I resent women who drive fiats. Can't stand the things. And men who have yachts. I'll never have one, never will be able to afford one, so definitely mean anyone else should have that privilege....

Not really sure how this helps. Yes, some people are luckier than others.

334bu · 01/08/2021 15:36

Yes sour apple you may well have a point but this thread is not the place to explore it. Please start a new thread.

merrymouse · 01/08/2021 15:36

"and ask yourself how many of them could've been written by a man."

If you want to fight for more men to be SAHPs really just go ahead.

LoislovesStewie · 01/08/2021 15:35

If a couple both work and share finances, the one who has the highest paid job (often the one who carried on working) usually has the more stressful day, as pay is usually based on responsibility. The flipside obviously is that they have more personal security but you can't have your cake and eat it. If you work you don't get to see your kids growing up.
Bloody hell! I worked full time, did a very stressful, but enjoyable job and quite honestly wasn't paid a fortune. What more can I say?

Floralcoral · 01/08/2021 15:34

@SourAppleChew

Ok, last post about the patriarchy as I'm seriously derailing now.

Read the below collection of quotes which another poster collected from the SAHM thread and ask yourself how many of them could've been written by a man.

My sil is 44, rich and has NEVER had a job, lucky her! She has no trouble filling her day and has a great life.

Dp earns the money then gives it to me. Why would I feel oppressed?

I haven't worked in 8 years and bloody love it! I got to go shopping without ds today and have a long lunch with a friend. Going to the gym now.

My friend is married to the son of a billionaire and sometimes I have to block her on social media because her life is one long holiday.

I dont work, I was able to be a sahm with my sons, both in 30s now. I lunch, dressmake, walk my dogs for miles, spend time with friends and family etc....
I also volunteer for a small homeless charity, something I am so passionate about, being literally close to home.
I feel totally fulfilled!

My DSis married a very high earner and has never worked a day in her life.

My DH works 80 hours a week for a signficant amount of money, which allows me to be a SAHM and indulge myself, allow me to do all of my volunteering and my hobbies.

I work just a few hours a week in a job I love doing, I don’t have to work for financial reasons. I’ve accidentally ended up with a really high earning DH. I enjoy having lots of time to myself, I have hobbies, an amazing spa membership and an extremely fortunate to have some really good friends whom I’m able to see nearly every week.

My SIL is lucky enough to not have to work due to DB’s income. She has nice things, goes out for lots of lunches.

I'm a SAHM who has teenage children and is fortunate to be married to a high earner so I haven't needed to work since having kids. We do have a lifestyle that most people would find impressive.

I choose not to work. DH works really long shifts and odd hours so can be out of the house either days or nights, with each week being different. When the kids are grown I'll go and get some post-sahm work. Maybe in a shop, factory, cafe or something similar.

The funniest post was Monday morning when she started by posting “it’s going to be a long week, hoping the nanny isn’t late” followed by “anyone know a place I can get nails done, not happy with the place I’ve been going as I think they overcharge and wanting a day to pamper myself a bit.”

I feel lucky that I don't need to work. I am not getting any benefits because dh earns enough.

I'm lucky in that I didn't have to carry on working.

I am lucky enough not to work and stay at home with my son, as DH is a high earner. I feel extremely grateful for this every day, and try very hard not to take it for granted.

But what's your point? It isn't some sort of secret that some women stay at home and enjoy it, what point are you trying to make?
CandyLeBonBon · 01/08/2021 15:34

@SourAppleChew

Ok, last post about the patriarchy as I'm seriously derailing now.

Read the below collection of quotes which another poster collected from the SAHM thread and ask yourself how many of them could've been written by a man.

My sil is 44, rich and has NEVER had a job, lucky her! She has no trouble filling her day and has a great life.

Dp earns the money then gives it to me. Why would I feel oppressed?

I haven't worked in 8 years and bloody love it! I got to go shopping without ds today and have a long lunch with a friend. Going to the gym now.

My friend is married to the son of a billionaire and sometimes I have to block her on social media because her life is one long holiday.

I dont work, I was able to be a sahm with my sons, both in 30s now. I lunch, dressmake, walk my dogs for miles, spend time with friends and family etc....
I also volunteer for a small homeless charity, something I am so passionate about, being literally close to home.
I feel totally fulfilled!

My DSis married a very high earner and has never worked a day in her life.

My DH works 80 hours a week for a signficant amount of money, which allows me to be a SAHM and indulge myself, allow me to do all of my volunteering and my hobbies.

I work just a few hours a week in a job I love doing, I don’t have to work for financial reasons. I’ve accidentally ended up with a really high earning DH. I enjoy having lots of time to myself, I have hobbies, an amazing spa membership and an extremely fortunate to have some really good friends whom I’m able to see nearly every week.

My SIL is lucky enough to not have to work due to DB’s income. She has nice things, goes out for lots of lunches.

I'm a SAHM who has teenage children and is fortunate to be married to a high earner so I haven't needed to work since having kids. We do have a lifestyle that most people would find impressive.

I choose not to work. DH works really long shifts and odd hours so can be out of the house either days or nights, with each week being different. When the kids are grown I'll go and get some post-sahm work. Maybe in a shop, factory, cafe or something similar.

The funniest post was Monday morning when she started by posting “it’s going to be a long week, hoping the nanny isn’t late” followed by “anyone know a place I can get nails done, not happy with the place I’ve been going as I think they overcharge and wanting a day to pamper myself a bit.”

I feel lucky that I don't need to work. I am not getting any benefits because dh earns enough.

I'm lucky in that I didn't have to carry on working.

I am lucky enough not to work and stay at home with my son, as DH is a high earner. I feel extremely grateful for this every day, and try very hard not to take it for granted.

Start a new thread about it. This is not the place. But not here. You're derailing. You know you're derailjng but yet you continue.

Oh look. Your male privilege is showing!

Theeyeballsinthesky · 01/08/2021 15:33

Is the OP really here moaning that women aren’t being nice to them?? It never ceases to amaze me how much those born male continue to expect that women will just rush in to Pat their head & say “there there” the moment they say they’re unhappy

I’m extremely unhappy that women’s single sex spaces are being erased but women’s unhappiness doesn’t seem to matter….

merrymouse · 01/08/2021 15:33

I would die to protect a woman.

Bit weird. If you are going to die to protect a random stranger, why not also men?

Feminists aren't asking anyone to die for them - just for protection of the rights and policies that enable equal participation for women in society.

RedDogsBeg · 01/08/2021 15:31

How depressingly predictable from the OP: aggressive from the outset, women must do and act as I tell them, deny, deny, deny any consequences for women, provide no coherent argument or evidence, NATWALT, throw out insults, be disingenuous, frame disagreement as abuse and for a final flourish abusive name calling and insults.

Posting in good faith, my arse.

SourAppleChew · 01/08/2021 15:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

CandyLeBonBon · 01/08/2021 15:30

If a couple both work and share finances, the one who has the highest paid job (often the one who carried on working) usually has the more stressful day, as pay is usually based on responsibility. The flipside obviously is that they have more personal security but you can't have your cake and eat it. If you work you don't get to see your kids growing up.

Define 'stressful job'. I'd say you've got quite a dated attitude which is Mired in sexist stereotypes.

Artichokeleaves · 01/08/2021 15:29

I would die to protect a woman.

It's a shame you won't listen to her though. Or consider her individual needs, her privacy, her dignity, her history and how being born biologically female may have affected her. Tbh she would probably appreciate that a whole lot more.

For what its worth, I'm never going to stand by while anyone harms or intimidates a TW, or a TM or a NB person, or anyone else. It's not that i don't understand your needs and your feelings, and it is not that I don't care about them. It is just that women have needs too, they are incompatible, and women just co operating and shutting up and suffering to benefit TW is not a solution. It's nothing good.

The answer is third spaces.

merrymouse · 01/08/2021 15:27

No, the choice to give up working and sacrifice some freedom instead (often not very much when finances are shared) is a female privilege.

Strictly speaking there is nothing to stop men also giving up work. However, men seem less willing to fight to change societal perceptions of how men and women should behave.

CandyLeBonBon · 01/08/2021 15:26

@SourAppleChew

In this context that isn't what male privilege means though.

No, the choice to give up working and sacrifice some freedom instead (often not very much when finances are shared) is a female privilege. It's a relevant point when people start going on about how easy life is for men (it isn't, because suicide is the main cause of male death).

Where on this thread has anyone stated that men have an easy life? Or breeze through anything? Nobody believes that? We're very aware of make mental health issues. We have husbands, sons, brothers and fathers.

But you've essentially hijack a thread where women are talking about protecting and safeguarding their protected spaces by shouting "but what about the men"?

If you're concerned about make mental health, and how unfairly you think men are treated, then start your own thread. As stated, the patriarchal structures that exist in our society do favour men over women, but that comes with an unpleasant price tag. Of course tjat needs addressing. Feel free to campaign for the better mental health services for men. Help break down societies gendered expectations that fuel toxic masculinity but don't lecture women with your tedious whataboutery.

SourAppleChew · 01/08/2021 15:23

I tend to avoid the word privilege and use advantage instead. The working world for example favours men. It doesn't favour women in the same way but because of societal expectations (patriarchy) it's hard to balance things out. Therefore women end up with lower pensions, lower paid jobs, less financial independence etc.

I wanted to share care of my children with my now exH so that we could both have our careers but he refused to even ask for flexible working because he didn't want to colleagues and management to consider him as less professional than his peers (his words). So I had to take the hit.

That's one example of how men are advantaged. I will also have to work until I'm 67. But I have lost 15 years of career and earning capacity snd have re entered the job market on less than I was on nearly 20 years ago. Because patriarch notions of it being more acceptable for a woman to take a career hit than a man.

That's one example. Saying that patriarchy is problematic also doesn't mean I hate men, it means that the system in which we exist offers, generally speaking, more advantages if you are male - but they still come at a cost - for men and women (in terms of health, mental snd physical etc)

I agree with much of this.

I don't think that it can be authoritatively put in a box as many seem to try, because every situation is different. Many posters on here seem to see a job as a barometer of success but most men I know see it as a means to pay the bills.

If a couple both work and share finances, the one who has the highest paid job (often the one who carried on working) usually has the more stressful day, as pay is usually based on responsibility. The flipside obviously is that they have more personal security but you can't have your cake and eat it. If you work you don't get to see your kids growing up.

Artichokeleaves · 01/08/2021 15:23

tried to put forward something intelligent, and I haven't received a single kind word.

Female people do not owe anyone the service of kindness or indulgence or agreement on the grounds that they're female and this is their job. You've actually been responded to more patiently than the female posters here would speak with another female: go and read AIBU. Female people don't indulge each other much at all, their expectations of each other are generally very high indeed.

Just a load of crap and abuse.

No one has abused you. No one has been as rude to you as you are freely being yourself on this thread. If you're seeing women trying to explain their issues and needs and feelings to you as 'crap' then really I think you're probably explaining how subhuman you really perceive women as. You don't seem to believe they are entitled to independence of thought or opinion or need that is different to what you tell them.

Even if it were possible to do some kind of Vulcan mindmeld on the door to assess if this particular male person is a sincere TW who is a good person who will not use their special access to the detriment of the women and children present -

Even if there was any way at all to gatekeep which male people come in and which don't -

Women who cannot be in mixed sex spaces will still be forced out by their presence.

That's not inclusion. Those women are probably lovely and harmless too. Those women also have lives, and needs and diversities.

Mixed sex spaces does not work for all women. Unfortunately this requires recognising that TW and W are not one and the same thing with identical needs that can always be met as one group.

Chickenyhead · 01/08/2021 15:23

OP you have absolutely NO idea what it is to be a woman. You haven't got a clue how to put anyone before yourself.

As for Sour, I'm surprised anyone married you at all.

merrymouse · 01/08/2021 15:22

and not worry about what's between their legs

This is what you say if you have never had to think about the consequences of possessing female biology.

Imagine saying it on a site called 'mumsnet'.

Floralcoral · 01/08/2021 15:22

@SourAppleChew

In this context that isn't what male privilege means though.

No, the choice to give up working and sacrifice some freedom instead (often not very much when finances are shared) is a female privilege. It's a relevant point when people start going on about how easy life is for men (it isn't, because suicide is the main cause of male death).

I think your example actually proves the opposite of what you think it does. Often within a household the woman will be the one to drop hours/stay at home with the children as the man earns more (hint, it's not always just because he works harder than women do). Sometimes it's a choice, other times it's a burden placed on women due to societal pressures, balancing the cost of childcare which is often seen as a woman's expense for some reason, and because the man's super important job means he can't possibly help around the home. This isn't true in every instance of course, but to say that because a few women (not the majority by any stretch) have the option to choose what to do because they can be financially supported by their husbands (who also benefit from the arrangement btw) is a beacon of female privilege, although I hate the phrase...educate yourself.

Also privilege isn't about life being easy, but it's that many elements aren't made harder due to your biological sex. Again, if you think about it I am sure you can imagine a few examples of why that's the case. I also agree that society does disadvantage men in many ways, and that there should be support as its a tragedy that so many men are lost to suicide; but that doesn't negate the point that male privilege exists.

Chickenyhead · 01/08/2021 15:17

@SourAppleChew

What the hell makes you think women want their partner to do everything for them? Outrageous.

It's the fact that they actually have the choice!

A choice which a fair few women take once the kids are at school and the husband is earning a nice wedge. You see them on the SAHM threads defending 'their choice' to those that believe women have a moral obligation to work.

Who has this imaginary choice of yours?

I certainly don't. Never have.

MALE PRIVILEGE