Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

2 Teachers in the US fired for speaking out about gender identity

61 replies

Mulletsaremisunderstood · 19/07/2021 15:28

More bullsh!t from the US. I just wanted to post this as another response to 'that will never happen'. Women are losing their jobs for this.

The article is from the brilliant 4W feminist site about 2 teachers in the US who were fired because they started a campaign to keep school toilets single sex.

4w.pub/two-oregon-educators-fired-after-speaking-out-about-gender-identity-policies/

North Middle School Assistant Principal, Rachel Damiano, and 7th-grade science teacher, Katie Medart, were fired at a public hearing of the Grants Pass 7 school district in Oregon on Thursday. The two women were each terminated by a 4-3 vote of the board after hours of statements, questioning, and debate.

Rachel and Katie were accused of using school district time or resources in the creation or promotion of “I Resolve,” a grassroots movement founded by the two educators which proposes “solutions for education policies” to address the conflict of rights arising from new “gender identity” laws and policies impacting schools in Oregon and across the country. In March, the two posted a video on Youtube describing their proposal, which includes separating school bathrooms by physical anatomy.

If anyone in the US wants to support them, they founded a movement called I Resolve www.iresolvemovement.com/ in an effort to find reasonable solutions to the mess that's going on over there, mainly focusing on education.

The website is pretty new, so there's not much on there but you can support them by buying t-shirts.

OP posts:
Whatwouldscullydo · 20/07/2021 08:15

I'd be more worried about teachers who didn't speak out.

If teachers were prepared to go akd supervise PE changing , knowing full well tested could be naked or half dressed members of the opposite sex there then that would he a red flag.

Most teachers would not dream.of putting themselves in that position. To.protect children trans or otherwise and themselves.

Soontobe60 · 20/07/2021 08:12

@RobinMoiraWhite
I would reccomend a degree of caution in speaking of a protected characteristic possessed by real people as an 'ideology' and thinking that will be consequence-free

The protected characteristic is gender reassignment. The belief in any ideology is a different protected characteristic, that of a religious belief and the belief that gender ideology is harmful also falls under this PC as the recent Maya Forstater case proved. As such, one cannot, in this country, be penalised in any way for ones belief in the harm gender ideology does to women and children in particular.

JonBinary · 20/07/2021 08:08

Wistful application of the law sounds about right embarrassing. Grin

JonBinary · 20/07/2021 08:04

It certainly seems odd that a lawyer would be here prowling the boards and speaking in this threatening tone towards women. About an ideology that flies in the face of children's safeguards. Having searched it seems that this is by no means the first time they have done this. Seems to me that they should start educating themselves about the bigger picture.

Sophoclesthefox · 20/07/2021 07:56

Now, I only have a tiny little ladybrain and so should probably just laugh a tinkly little laugh and not bother my pretty little head about it any further, but…

If it is so, so difficult to determine who and what a woman is, because of this formless, shifting constellation, this unknowable essence, etc….how is it that when it comes to knowing who to sack and who to silence, it’s unerringly always women copping it?

Hmm
EmbarrassingAdmissions · 20/07/2021 07:52

@JonBinary

Wishful application of the law seems to be a feature for some of these people. Fake it til you make it, as the saying goes.
I read that as 'wistful' - I genuinely need to take the time for a prescription change. Blush
Helleofabore · 20/07/2021 07:50

But there is nothing at all sinister about a ‘known’ lawyer issuing warnings on a forum board discussing the negative impacts of a group they belong to on the rights of women and girls to overcome a millennia of sexist discrimination because of our female bodies.

Nothing sinister at all, all par for course it seems with pipe-bomb threats, women’s employers being tweeted to ‘bring their wrongthink’ to attention with pressure to do something about it, nine year old girls being told they shouldn’t look at a male penis exposed in a female naked section of a spa….

Gosh… whoodathunkit.

JonBinary · 20/07/2021 07:40

Wishful application of the law seems to be a feature for some of these people. Fake it til you make it, as the saying goes.

Helleofabore · 20/07/2021 07:38

Interesting…. So now under 18’s who cannot get a GRC are in a protected category? You are warning a teacher to be careful and not one of those pupils under the age of 18 will have a GRC.

More wishful application of law.

LastSummerHere · 20/07/2021 07:36

I doubt we shall be taking advice from a lawyer who can't even spell.

rabbitwoman · 20/07/2021 07:31

*RobinMoiraWhite

ValancyRedfern

I saw this. Terrifying. Especially as I am a teacher who speaks out against gender ideology.

I would reccomend a degree of caution in speaking of a protected characteristic possessed by real people as an 'ideology' and thinking that will be consequence-free*

Why? What is going to happen, then?

People speak out constantly about issues such as religion, politics, climate change, being a vegan - what sets this issue apart?

Leafstamp · 20/07/2021 07:03

For info @RobinMoiraWhite, schools are fast realising that speaking out against gender ideology is absolutely necessary in order for them to comply withThe Equality Act, The Education Act, their Master Funding Agreements (for Academies) as well as various DfE and Ofsted guidelines.

EmbarrassingAdmissions · 20/07/2021 04:40

I would reccomend a degree of caution in speaking of a protected characteristic possessed by real people as an 'ideology' and thinking that will be consequence-free.

Is this advice being made as one MN member to another? Or, with respect to your professional standing, is this to be interpreted as legal advice (which gives it a different interpretation)? (I'd be surprised at this.)

MilesOfSand · 20/07/2021 04:38

I’m thinking more Dolores Umbridge.

AMCoffeePMWine · 20/07/2021 04:10

@BoreOfWhabylon

I would reccomend a degree of caution in speaking of a protected characteristic possessed by real people as an 'ideology' and thinking that will be consequence-free.

Somehow, I always "hear" Robin's helpful advice in the voice of Ann Dowd's Aunt Lydia.

Now you’ve mentioned this, it makes perfect sense. Aunt Lydia indeed. Blessed day.

And always this. Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 20/07/2021 03:06

👏👏👏

Aparallaxia · 20/07/2021 02:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BoreOfWhabylon · 20/07/2021 01:53

I would reccomend a degree of caution in speaking of a protected characteristic possessed by real people as an 'ideology' and thinking that will be consequence-free.

Somehow, I always "hear" Robin's helpful advice in the voice of Ann Dowd's Aunt Lydia.

PurgatoryOfPotholes · 20/07/2021 01:25

As religion and belief are themselves one of the nine protected characteristics, how can it be a problem to use the term "ideology"? Does anyone think something would or should happen to me in the workplace because I posted on mumsnet about "Christian ideology"?

What are protected characteristics?

It is against the law to discriminate against someone because of:

age
disability
gender reassignment
marriage and civil partnership
pregnancy and maternity
race
religion or belief
sex
sexual orientation

Theseare called protected characteristics.

JonBinary · 20/07/2021 00:40

Grin me too Floral.

FloralBunting · 20/07/2021 00:12

I, for one, welcome such a stellar legal mind representing Stonewall. I sleep better because of it.

Wink
NotBadConsidering · 19/07/2021 23:31

I would reccomend a degree of caution in speaking of a protected characteristic possessed by real people as an 'ideology' and thinking that will be consequence-free.

You’re quite fond of “recommending a degree of caution” despite being a barrister active in many of these sorts of cases in the UK who has posted your personal views all over Mumsnet for several years 😆😆. Oh and Twitter.

mobile.twitter.com/BluskyeAllison/status/1391455349199212545

Maybe you should caution yourself for a change.

Abhannmor · 19/07/2021 23:23

You threatening me , John?

littlbrowndog · 19/07/2021 23:17

Well

2 Teachers in the US fired for speaking out about gender identity
LooksGood · 19/07/2021 23:14

The protected characteristic of gender reassignment isn't an ideology, is it? The philosophy underlying that characteristic might be, but it isn't fixed.

Presumably a year or so ago it was okay for children at @ValencyRedfern 's school to be taught about boy's brains in girl's bodies? Now it's not. Is a biology teacher meant to teach the jelly baby / clownfish model of the sexes? We should not discourage teachers from expressing concerns or reservations in the appropriate manner and forum and I hope you're not suggesting it's illegal for them to do so.

Thank you @ValancyRedfern