Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

mumsnet have moved one of my threads without permission and effectivelly instructed us how we may or may not discuss things.

93 replies

stumbledin · 25/06/2021 15:46

I started a thread on the newsnight programme from last night about the man eventually convicted of killing two women after years of police failure.

For reason known only to the irrational concepts of mumsnet they have moved it to the "chat" board.

This is on one level just plain daft as there is already a thread on there about this, so there didn't need to be another.

But I specifically chose to have it on this thread as this is more likely to be where women who understand about women's sex based oppression post and I wanted to interact with them.

On one level this is political censorship. They created the division so they will have to live with them.

Hosting a board does NOT entitle you to tell those using the service how to think.

So not only have they falsely labelled this board a debate about something none of us are talking about (gender) they are now, with out having the gumption to even spell it out, taking secret decisions about what is or is not appropriate.

mumsnet seems to have suddenly decided that because the board is popular means that what they think is right think. Whereas what makes it popular are the posters.

This is like those facebook groups where the group admins suddently go power mad and think they because they are the admin they are also the holder of all true thought.

This is like the interns have taken over from the adults.

this is l

OP posts:
PurpleHoodie · 25/06/2021 23:49

Just as well we're not watched, monitored, and maliciously reported by people who'd rather silence women, isn't it?

PurpleHoodie · 25/06/2021 23:48

Don't be so cynical Arabella

Ok. I lasted 2 seconds before I did a real snort laugh.

ArabellaScott · 25/06/2021 23:41

I'm with you, stumbled.

I thought people wanted to be able to ignore the 'sex and gender' topic, so why would people be asking for threads to be moved out of here and into the other one? Doesn't that defeat the whole point?

Well, unless the whole idea was just a diversionary tactic to cause strife, ill-will and confusion, and further irritate the mods. Just as well we're not watched, monitored, and maliciously reported by people who'd rather silence women, isn't it?

Whistfulwisteria · 25/06/2021 23:37

Freud definitely wasn't alive when email was invented.

NotBadConsidering · 25/06/2021 23:36

@Whistfulwisteria

But I specifically chose to have it on this thread as this is more likely to be where women who understand about women's sex based oppression post and I wanted to interact with them.

I think you are misunderstanding Justine and the mods emails.

Emails? Was this a Freudian slip?
Whistfulwisteria · 25/06/2021 23:33

But it looks like mumsnet seem to think they are runnning a nursery school were naughtly toddlers need to be told how to right think.

I don't think I am in a nursery school being told how to right think.
I don't interpret anything mumsnet has done as putting me in a nursery school.

Stumbledin however is fairly insistent that I'm in a nursery school.

stumbledin · 25/06/2021 23:29

I did get an email back saying they thought it was more suitable to be in "chat" even though I had pointed out there was an existing thread there about this.

I have said I dont accept their decision as it isn't their right to say the context in which I discuss things. ie the silly label they have made up doesn't alter the fact that this is still the feminism and women's rights board, as can be seen by the actual URL www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights (*) and that's where I wanted to have the discussion.

I have also asked for their formal complaints procedure.

(*) I presume they kept the original URL because obviously this has the most threads on it and it would be a massive job to change the web links of all the threads that have been created on here. And quite honestly if the genuinely believe that somehow there is a "debate" (where are these debate posts) why didn't they just create a new url / web link called Feminism Debate.

OP posts:
RufustheBadgeringReindeer · 25/06/2021 23:22

And i agree with turquoise and i agree that stumbled did not compare us to children in any way shape or form

Just while I’m here…

Whistfulwisteria · 25/06/2021 23:17

Decision tree:

Is it about the sex and gender identity debate.

Y - in the sex and gender board.
N - in the feminist chat board.

You're welcome.

RufustheBadgeringReindeer · 25/06/2021 23:11

started a thread on the newsnight programme from last night about the man eventually convicted of killing two women after years of police failure

For reason known only to the irrational concepts of mumsnet they have moved it to the "chat" board

This is on one level just plain daft as there is already a thread on there about this, so there didn't need to be another

But I specifically chose to have it on this thread as this is more likely to be where women who understand about women's sex based oppression post and I wanted to interact with them

Well thats absolutely ridiculous, i think they should explain why they moved it

PurpleHoodie · 25/06/2021 22:44

Blimey. Just, blimey.

stumbled FlowersCake

Whistfulwisteria · 25/06/2021 20:21

I wrote celebrate and my phone changed it, before I get reported for biscuiting!

Whistfulwisteria · 25/06/2021 20:15

I do get the dilemma, I've been involved in change were I have objected on the grounds that it won't work and have been told I am resisting change.
It's the old denial conundrum, I'm not an alcoholic, yes that's what alcoholics say.

However 😜

Most of the objecting I can see are huge inflations of the glass half empty theory.

A board specialising in the debate we demanded (and I include myself in that) now exists.

Can't we 🥂?

stumbledin · 25/06/2021 20:06

please do not move this thread as it relates to women's sex-based oppression" in every OP

Exactly.

OP posts:
Whistfulwisteria · 25/06/2021 20:05

The model is both about employees and completely transferable to users, it's about human behaviour.

The size of the change affects how much unfreezing is needed and it's clear that this is the source of conflict. I expect mumsnet had a real dilemma about how possessive users/are.

I'm not at all misinterpreting Stumbledin. By implication those that have got on with it are happy in the mummies playground we are now speaking in. Challenging that as an insult is less about those getting on with it and more about the characterisation of us Stumbledin is forming, that we are passive children and not adults that are accepting of change without the need for extended handling through it.

CharlieParley · 25/06/2021 20:01

^ resistance/adaptation

ErrolTheDragon · 25/06/2021 19:58

Apologies if I've missed anything, but have you reported your thread, OP, and asked them to move it back? I wasn't pleased with where some of mine landed after the split, I asked and they were happy to move them.

CharlieParley · 25/06/2021 19:44

@Whistfulwisteria

www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_94.htm

This is a great change model. In this Stumbledin you were insufficiently "unfrozen".

Any thoughts on the model?

Yeah, my thought is that its an interesting point you make there. And if analysed through the lens of change management, this board split would be an example of how not to do it, in my view.

So, if you're wanting to use Lewin's model, the first stage Unfreeze is about explaining the need for change and motivating your people to want to change. Unfortunately none of that happened here.

Of course what you are looking at is resistance/adaption to change in users, not management or staff.

Now I understand (I think) why MN wanted to make this change, but as we are not employees of MN, but its users, none of the change management model actually applies to us. It is better applied to Justine and her team.

P.S. I would suggest that you are misinterpreting stumbledin's meaning with the comparison to teens/toddlers. It's not a judgement of those who have welcomed or at the verly least acquiesced to the change that says we are teens/toddlers but a reflection on how she thinks posters on this board are being treated as if we were teens/toddlers.

P.S.S. I don't welcome the change, because I think it is counterproductive on all measures (i.e. for us and for what MN needs) but we are essentially sharecroppers here. Either you accept the rules and the structure of the board or you don't. I simply don't have the energy to fight something I don't have control over. But I'll certainly not judge anyone who has the passion to do so. I happen to know that tilting at windmills is not always the folly it seems to be.

Whistfulwisteria · 25/06/2021 19:16

www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_94.htm

This is a great change model. In this Stumbledin you were insufficiently "unfrozen".

Any thoughts on the model?

allmywhat · 25/06/2021 19:11

Well, that's crap of them. I guess we need to put "please do not move this thread as it relates to women's sex-based oppression" in every OP.

Or you could just include in every thread starter "PS trans women are not women" Grin Which is tempting, but probably not wise.

Whistfulwisteria · 25/06/2021 19:08

It's been an interesting study in how change averse people are Stumbledin.

Reaction to change reflects who we are. Many are getting on with it, and those still objecting are demonstrating resistance to change, something I do find fascinating, particularly in the context of feminism.

I can't help but notice how much posting you have done about this change, and as someone used to observing resistance to change your multiple posts have definitely caught my eye. And that of others no doubt.

It's interesting to read the approach you are taking, that every one is childish or immature for getting on with it and by implication the only mature approach is to carry on objecting.

I would agree if it wasn't for the fact that most of your objections are quite far off the mark.

Pleased you are enjoying my observations.

stumbledin · 25/06/2021 18:54

I am describing someone's behaviour.

You are saying it is insulting.

I am illustrating how someone's behaviour makes them seem.

Still I am quite flattered that you seem to think it is worth replying to my comments.

Keeps the thread at the top of the board.

thanks!

OP posts:
Whistfulwisteria · 25/06/2021 18:29

Whistfulwisteria - what are you talking about.

I'm talking about this.

But it looks like mumsnet seem to think they are runnning a nursery school were naughtly toddlers need to be told how to right think.

Do you really need to keep insulting everyone?

stumbledin · 25/06/2021 18:17

Whistfulwisteria - what are you talking about.

If there is a decision taken about a thread then any decent adult would come on the board and explain and ask for feedback.

So unless or until someone at @MNHQ has the good manners and professional practice to come on this board its irrelevant what made have been said behind out backs.

If Justine or whoever wants to lead a political party where everyone toes her line thats fine.

But this is a discussion board for those who have signed up to it to talk about what interests them with others who may or may not share that interest.

But it looks like mumsnet seem to think they are runnning a nursery school were naughtly toddlers need to be told how to right think.

Everything that has been done has been underhand - and irrational.

And more and more looks like political manipulation.

Handy hint Whistfulwisteria - you dont have to read threads I start if you dont like what I say.

ZuttZeVootEeeVro - yes the title is misleading - deliberately. You have to ask yourself why.

CervixSampler - unfortunately some contributors are also feeling like you and some are wondering if that isn't the purpose of this illogical signposting.

OP posts:
CervixSampler · 25/06/2021 18:04

It's pissing me off. I wanted to discuss something today that came up (I have no friends to talk to about these things so post
on here instead) and I didn't know where to post so didn't bother. I find interaction difficult enough without having to think about which board is best for each feminism question.

Swipe left for the next trending thread