Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Joan of Arc was trans????

237 replies

Greenandcabbagelooking · 23/06/2021 14:36

It's Schools Diversity Week this week. There has been no mention of any kind of diversity other than LGBTQIA+. Heavy on the T. We've been reminded every day for weeks about this.

Today's update says Joan of Arc was trans because she didn't dress like a woman. There's even a discussion on the pronouns she (sorry, he/they) would have used. Silly me, I though Joan was just a woman who was fed up with the limitations her sex imposed on her. Clearly short hair + trousers = man.

I'm all for showing young people a diverse range of role models, but transing people who lived several hundred years ago is not all that helpful.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Coyoacan · 25/06/2021 19:41

I know it's a lot to ask, but it would be nice if mumsnet could explain specifically why a post has been deleted, as I know I didn't write anything hateful and there was no-one to misgender.

Coyoacan · 25/06/2021 18:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

MrsBunHat · 25/06/2021 18:08

@MrsBunHat she said at her trial that she dressed as a man because God had commanded her to do that. She was not in any kind of disguise. It's not possible to tell what was going on in her head.

Yes, but she also called herself a woman. I didn't say it was a disguise, more what she needed to do to achieve her aims.

(Although many men and women in history have disguised themselves ad the opposite sex and that didn't make them trans either...)

TurquoiseLemur · 25/06/2021 17:27

@Ilovelove

Surely the point of the Joan of Arc story was how remarkable it was that God used a woman to lead an army - thus within a patriarchal culture - the point being God does not limit women the way society does. Society is wrong in limiting women.

....limit women the way the society does.....hmmmm....

"God does not limit women the way society does" says a church that has spent its history doing its utmost to limit women.
TherightsideofHERstory · 25/06/2021 17:26

I pass this statue most days, Aethelflaed, our lady of the Mercians. She was quite the badass so probably only a matter of time until the lady title gets dropped from history. As the statue finishes at the waist perhaps they’ll be known as Aethelflaed, our non binary person of the Mercians?

Joan of Arc was trans????
DadJoke · 25/06/2021 17:20

@ekofish either it's specific, in which case she can't say anything, or it's generic, in which case there is no problem with posting a screenshot of the offending page.

Ekofisk · 25/06/2021 16:52

@DadJoke

I have read OP’s contributions. Yes, OP stated that the resources were on their work email. That doesn’t make it specific to their school though.

Ilovelove · 25/06/2021 16:51

Surely the point of the Joan of Arc story was how remarkable it was that God used a woman to lead an army - thus within a patriarchal culture - the point being God does not limit women the way society does. Society is wrong in limiting women.

....limit women the way the society does.....hmmmm....

DadJoke · 25/06/2021 16:46

@ekofish she said that she couldn't post any specifics because she'd get into trouble as it would identify her. That would not be the case if it was a resource. Read her contributions. I am sure she can clarify if she wants to.

DadJoke · 25/06/2021 16:45

@MrsBunHat she said at her trial that she dressed as a man because God had commanded her to do that. She was not in any kind of disguise. It's not possible to tell what was going on in her head.

MrsBunHat · 25/06/2021 16:37

Do you not think its possible that the voice of God could have been her way or trying to rationalise or process relentless dysphoria?

I think as she had some powerful motives - to fight and to avoid being raped - occam's razor suggests they are the best explanation, rather than that she just had some urge to wear "men's" clothes, or suffered from dysphoria. Honestly she comes across to me as someone who had more pressing things to concern her than mulling over her "identity". Even if she wanted to be a boy, she knew she couldn't change sex and knew she was female, so she got on with it. Much like me in 1978. And was I trans? No.

People thinking they can just identify into the opposite sex and that what they feel like matters more than reality is a pretty modern phenomenon.

Ekofisk · 25/06/2021 16:35

[quote DadJoke]@ekofisk - if it had been in the resource pack, OP would have had no problem showing it to us. Asking wot see what the actual fuss is about entirely reasonable. A screenshot would be fine. But, she said she couldn't provide information because it was specific to her school. It is not up to me to provide evidence for someone else's post. I've searched pretty hard. If it says "Joan of Arc was a trans man" as the OP suggests, then it would be problematic.

@GoingGently living women can speak for themselves about their gender identity.[/quote]
@DadJoke

Can you point to any of OP’s posts where they said it’s specific to their school?

Holothane · 25/06/2021 16:19

🤦‍♀️ Give me strength.

AssassinatedBeauty · 25/06/2021 16:18

@DadJoke as before. If you think the OP is suspect or malicious then report the post. Stop troll hunting on the thread itself.

DadJoke · 25/06/2021 16:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SallyCinnabon · 25/06/2021 16:02

@AssassinatedBeauty

Wrong on all counts, but thanks for playing.
Grin
AssassinatedBeauty · 25/06/2021 15:59

Wrong on all counts, but thanks for playing.

ool0n · 25/06/2021 15:58

[quote Ekofisk]@DadJoke

it's 100% not on the Just Like Us charity website

No it’s not on the website, it’s most likely in the resource pack that you have to sign up to receive.

Have you signed up to receive the resource pack? That would settle the matter then, wouldn’t it?[/quote]
9 pages of reactionary scaremongering over a great initiative - Schools Diversity Week - and no evidence the OP is even referencing anything from the initiative!

GoingGently · 25/06/2021 15:50

@Inthetropics Thanks for you and your wife, that sounds horrible

GoingGently · 25/06/2021 15:49

Actually reminds me of the Victorian notion of hysteria....if they are not conforming there must be something WRONG with them... then it was hysteria, now it's dysphoria.... same old same old

Littlepaws18 · 25/06/2021 15:48

This is an absolute insult to her name. She was captured by the British and they kept giving her male clothing and saying she brought it in herself magically into her prison. This meant she was a witch and as a result burnt her at the stake- don't rewrite history!

AlwaysTawnyOwl · 25/06/2021 15:42

@Imasoulman And as much clothing is unisex - which would have shocked our Victorian forefathers - and modern women would seem very bold in comparison to Victorian feminine stereotypes, then we’re all transmen now.

AlwaysTawnyOwl · 25/06/2021 15:39

@OldCrone

Do you not think its possible that the voice of God could have been her way or trying to rationalise or process relentless dysphoria?

And there you go again.

What do you mean by 'relentless dysphoria'? What makes you think she felt like that?

You're just speculating to fit your belief that there is such a thing as 'being trans' beyond just hating the stereotypes imposed on you because of your sex and/or hating the sexual characteristics of your body.

@Imasoulman Throughout history women have had their abilities, interests and freedoms constrained by gender stereotypes. It happened to me with my parents not wanting me to go to university, not study engineering and believing the best career I could aim for was being the Boss’s secretary. I rejected that as did many others and the result of feminists campaigning is that, in the West at least, women are freer to be themselves than ever before. But now we have a new movement that labels any women rejecting sexist crap, demeaning expectations otherwise know as ‘female gender identity’ as really men. Can’t you see how misogynistic this is? And how backwards? It labels women breaking out of gendered expectations as being ‘not really women’. We’re back to Victorian times.
Ekofisk · 25/06/2021 15:30

@DadJoke

it's 100% not on the Just Like Us charity website

No it’s not on the website, it’s most likely in the resource pack that you have to sign up to receive.

Have you signed up to receive the resource pack? That would settle the matter then, wouldn’t it?

TurquoiseLemur · 25/06/2021 15:18

@Inthetropics

Haven't read previous messages as i'm on my lunch break and have very little time on my hands now BUT...

I'm a lesbian and married to my very sexy and extremely butch wife who is 90% of the time seen as trans by other people. She is not trans at all, she just like to dress in what society has decided are men's clothes. She believes people should be able to dress and act how they want and is very and i mean VERY apalled by the fact some people just assume she is trans.

Your wife is right of course. Women and men should be able to dress how they like. Dressing in clothes that are conventionally perceived of as men's clothes does not make her trans. I understand that quite a few lesbians did this as far back as the 1920s (maybe before even?) and they too were not in doubt that they were women. And that is 100 years ago!

I have encountered transmen (both very young, early 20s at most) who insist "I am a transman because I don't want to wear lipstick." In which case, I too am trans and just never realized!

Swipe left for the next trending thread