Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

This is actually the Women's Rights section, look!

40 replies

33feethighandrising · 21/06/2021 17:11

So, they've renamed us Sex and Gender Debate (FFS).

But look, the URL of this section is www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights

So, we're basically the same section that was Feminism Chat before, (And FWR before that? Can anyone remember?)

And, this section is actually Women's Rights. Has been all along, no matter how many times they rename it.

It really should be called Women's Sex-Based Rights now, though, don't you think? Sex and gender debate is a shit name.

OP posts:
WanderinWomb · 21/06/2021 18:53

It really should be called Women's Sex-Based Rights now, though, don't you think? Sex and gender debate is a shit name

Women's Rights is fine as it is. No need to add "sex based" .

I'm actually embarrassed on MNs behalf. Proper cringe today.

UhtredRagnarson · 21/06/2021 18:46

Well it appears as though we are welcome to have a chat about feminism or discuss the sex and gender debate but nothing else has a place here on MN. I’m assuming MNHQ would like us to go elsewhere for that.

Iggi999 · 21/06/2021 18:35

So how do I know whether the issue I want to discuss (hypothetically) belongs on this side or the other side? And will a lot of them be spent moving things from one to the other?

UhtredRagnarson · 21/06/2021 18:24

Either here or under 'Feminism'. It's not that difficult to understand - there are only two boards now.

No we can’t discuss women’s rights here because this is the sex and gender debate board. And there is no board called feminism. There is feminism chat but women’s rights is a bit more serious than a chat. IMO.

yetanotherusernameAgain · 21/06/2021 18:21

Where can we discuss women’s rights?

Either here or under 'Feminism'. It's not that difficult to understand - there are only two boards now.

I don't know what the URL was before but the overall section was called "Feminism" and now has reverted to "Feminism & Women's Rights". Which should please the posters who continued to refer to it as FWR long after it changed to just "Feminism".

UhtredRagnarson · 21/06/2021 18:17

Oh wow! They’ve really cut down the feminism offering on MN! There used to be a lot more sub topics under feminism weren’t there?

This is actually the Women's Rights section, look!
UhtredRagnarson · 21/06/2021 18:14

So do MNHQ think that the only women’s rights issues are the “gender and sex”debate? Where have they put women’s rights? Where can we discuss women’s rights?

JayAlfredPrufrock · 21/06/2021 18:13

Well I didn’t know you were here.

I probably still can’t say what I think without being deleted 🙄

MerryDecembermas · 21/06/2021 18:13

So Womens Rights is now Sex Debate.. umm..

What's the other section then?!

OhDear2200 · 21/06/2021 18:11

Don’t know, but it a a right PITA having to switch between the two. You have to go all the way back to talk and then to the separate sections Hmm Confused

Iwishihadariver · 21/06/2021 18:05

@ViperAtTheGatesOfDawn

Women's rights would suffice.

The 'sex-based' is superfluous.

All women's rights are sex-based as women are all of one sex.

Yes. Women's rights is what it's all about.
BernardBlackMissesLangCleg · 21/06/2021 18:03

MNHQ don't actually like their users very much do they?

ViperAtTheGatesOfDawn · 21/06/2021 18:02

Women's rights would suffice.

The 'sex-based' is superfluous.

All women's rights are sex-based as women are all of one sex.

Mulletsaremisunderstood · 21/06/2021 17:58

Yeah Sex and Gender debate is nonsense....there is no debate remember? We're not allowed to debate it because then we are meanies! #nodebate

Someone suggested Feminism: Sex Based Rights and Protections as a forum name - I prefer that.

33feethighandrising · 21/06/2021 17:15

I mean, I don't think they should have split it at all, but as they have, they should at least use a name the members of the board will like.

How often do other boards have names forced on them they don't like?

The new boards I've noticed being set up have always had names that were liked by the people who wanted the board.

Having this name foisted on us is a shitty manoeuvre by MNHQ IMO.

OP posts: