Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Jess de Wahls

870 replies

Mollyollydolly · 16/06/2021 23:34

The Royal Academy have removed Jess' work from their shop due to a handful of complaints that she's 'transphobic'. If you want to support Jess her website is here.
www.jessdewahls.com
So sick of these utterly craven organisations. I hope she has a legal case against them for discrimination.

Jess de Wahls
OP posts:
Thread gallery
30
EndoplasmicReticulum · 17/06/2021 12:08

Sex Matters have written the RA a letter:

sex-matters.org/posts/the-workplace/the-royal-academy-and-belief-discrimination/

SoMuchForSummerLove · 17/06/2021 12:07

This is an incredibly clear and exemplary piece of writing

www.jessdewahls.com/blog/2019/8/5/somewhere-over-the-rainbow-something-went-terribly-wrong

YellowFish12 · 17/06/2021 11:54

I have emailed RA:

  • What evidence do they have JDW expressed transphobic views?
  • Are they aware of the recent MF ruling that gender critical beliefs are protected beliefs?
  • Having and expressing the belief that you cannot change sex and that trans woman/men are in fact not biological women/men is not a transphobic view and it is a perfectly legal and protected belief.
  • Are RA sure they are on the right ride of discrimination here - seemingly discriminating against a female artist (sex is a protected characteristic) for her truly legally held views (GC beliefs are a protected belief)?
  • Are RA thought-policing every artists to ensure no artists have distasteful views? How are they conducting this review?
  • Who at RA is deciding which views and beliefs are deemed to be distasteful - since RA is not using legality to decide?

Hopefully if enough people email they will back down?

SunnyintheSun · 17/06/2021 11:53

It’s just so bloody relentless, one woman after another suffering economically and emotionally because of these tyrants.

Have written to the RA tonight.

ScreamingMeMe · 17/06/2021 11:51

@Etinox

Sigh. Here’s a link to buy Jess’s wonderful work.
Dang it, the "heretic" one is sold out!
Etinox · 17/06/2021 11:45

Sigh.
Here’s a link to buy Jess’s wonderful work.

JulesJules · 17/06/2021 11:35

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

toffeebutterpopcorn · 17/06/2021 11:34

Hahahaha. I done a thing (my years at arts school didn’t fail me)...

Horizons83 · 17/06/2021 11:29

This is a gem of a Twitter thread:

mobile.twitter.com/royalacademy/status/1405174592856113154

You can guess how the responses are going..

Jess de Wahls
toffeebutterpopcorn · 17/06/2021 11:21

Jealousy is a terrible thing... the person who seemed to have kicked this off seems to have an axe to grind. Silly of the RA to roll over to show their tummy so fast.

Redshoeblueshoe · 17/06/2021 11:14

Littlebrowndog that's brilliant.
If you go on Twitter you can get a link to buy directly from Jess.

IvyTwines2 · 17/06/2021 11:05

@EmbarrassingAdmissions

The RA removed her for 8 complaints? Assuming this report is true:

twitter.com/Obsolesence/status/1405259156500713472?s=20

Were the complaints from:
the Pope;
Dalai Lama;
Archbishop of Canterbury;
HRH Queen Elizabeth;
Joe Biden;
Barack Obama;
Grayson Perry;
[equivalent of 4th plinth in Trafalgar Square]?

I've looked at their Instagram and it looks like it was a bunch of comments piling in under a totally unrelated RA post of a painting. I'd be surprised if many of those posting comments could even find London on a map, let alone be the sort of person who visits the RA. I suspect the vast majority of their regular visitors (and I'm one) will be horrified by the RA's actions yesterday.
ScreamingMeMe · 17/06/2021 10:16

@Beamur

Surely this is direct discrimination? I hope she gets legal advice.
I hope she does too. They are a disgrace.
Saisong · 17/06/2021 09:50

Oh that Twitter banner is a thing of beauty Grin

Beamur · 17/06/2021 09:42

Surely this is direct discrimination?
I hope she gets legal advice.

Thelnebriati · 17/06/2021 09:32

Wait, is this even legal after the Maya ruling?

Paralithic · 17/06/2021 09:24

According to the RA, Gill didn’t have a sex but he did have a gender.

Jess de Wahls
SelfPortraitWithEels · 17/06/2021 09:24

Surely this is covered by discrimination law?! Fucking idiots.

littlbrowndog · 17/06/2021 09:14

And women authors and poets

TatoAndBeans · 17/06/2021 09:11

Utterly pathetic. Who the fuck do these wannabe-thought-police think they are? The irony is that the sort of people who think they’re so incredibly open-minded, so liberal, so bohemian; they’re also so quick to police everyone else. They don’t see that if this was North Korea, they’d be the ones informing on their own children.

Rachel Ara did a really interesting YouTube with Cambridge Rad Fems recently. It really highlighted the hypocrisy of how it’s only women artists who are being cancelled. But we’re the ones who are “not real feminists” Hmm

WalkersAreNotTheOnlyCrisps · 17/06/2021 09:09

@littlbrowndog

From Twitter
Haha 😆
littlbrowndog · 17/06/2021 09:06

From Twitter

Jess de Wahls
PurgatoryOfPotholes · 17/06/2021 09:01

@Beamur

I think we should write and ask them if they are going to audit all of the artists that they stock and display to make sure purity is maintained. As that's obviously more important than artistic merit.
I've been continuing to browse through their artists, looking for names I recognise.

www.royalacademy.org.uk/art-artists/name/anish-kapoor-ra

I spotted Sir Anish Kapoor. I hasten to add, nothing that Anish has done is remotely anything like what Gill did! But Anish, who has the sole rights to use the paint Vantablack, has a long-running amusing feud going with the artist Stuart Semple, in which he is banned from buying any of Stuart's pigments as a retaliation for not sharing Vantablack with other artists.

Semple is known for his colorful paintings, which frequently make use of pop culture references. He’d been making his own pigments for years, and decided to release one to the public as a protest against Kapoor’s refusal to share Vantablack. Semple put out a pigment he called theWorld’s Pinkest Pink, available for just £3.99 to anyone who wanted it… except Kapoor. A legal disclaimer on Semple’s online store made this clear: “By adding this product to your cart you confirm that you are not Anish Kapoor, you are in no way affiliated to Anish Kapoor, you are not purchasing this item on behalf of Anish Kapoor or an associate of Anish Kapoor.”

But Lisson Gallery, Kapoor’s London representative, violated Semple’s terms of service to purchase the Pinkest Pink. Then Kapoor shared aphoto on Instagramfeaturing him flipping a pink-dipped middle finger to the camera. Caption: “Up yours.” And so the feud began.

(Continues: www.format.com/magazine/features/art/anish-kapoor-stuart-semple-vantablack-blackest-black)

I suppose we can take it that the Royal Academy of Arts has Taken A Side and that they wholly endorse everything Anish Kapoor has ever said or done on social media, yes?

SnoopsCaliforniaRoll · 17/06/2021 08:57

Utterly pathetic on the part of the RA. I have raised a complaint via the website's Contact form.

ScreamingMeMe · 17/06/2021 08:51

Craven, cowardly wankers.

Swipe left for the next trending thread