Well if your philosophy is "be kind", where does that end? "Being kind" when women's rights are threatened has real downsides for women. There is a clash of rights here, no matter how much some people pretend there isn't, and real people are being harassed, threatened (JKR), arrested (Marion MIllar) losing jobs (Maya), scholarships (Selina Soule), sports participation, their dignity and safety (see: Karen White in prison etc).
I hate seeing how this battle is being played out
You and me both. But the trans side isn't campaigning for third spaces or separate accommodation, they are trying to take ours even when they are legally protected by the Equality Act, AND make us bow through fear, social pressure and intimidation to say or let go unchallenged things which we do not believe are true - like that the definition of women includes anyone who says they are or feel like or "live as" a woman, however fleetingly that may be, and however rankly stereotypically they define such things. The result of that definitional change is rampant and has implications for every single place in law and policy where the word "woman" is used.
I will happily use someone's chosen name and acknowledge they have changed their gender - not their sex. I don't think transpeople should be discriminated against for jobs, housing, study, travel, in access to justice or services. But I will not accept changing the definition of "women" to the extent than women's rights and discrimination against women which is on the basis of our biology can no longer be defined or protected.