Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Nicole Smallman and Bibaa - man accused of their killing in court

82 replies

ArabellaScott · 09/06/2021 19:56

Trial set to last for four weeks.

RIP, Nicole and Bibaa. Thinking of their family and friends.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-57377414

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
LightSpeeds · 06/12/2021 21:39

What they did I find almost beyond belief. Where was their human decency? Do they have any?

I'm glad they got these sentences, which were actually longer than I expected (but not necessarily as long as I think they deserve).

letsallchant · 06/12/2021 21:26

Glad they've been sentenced now. I hope that will also mean some kind of dishonourable discharge from the force, whatever that would be called. And removal of pensions and all that. They should never in their lives again be able to take any benefit from having been a police officer.

So much respect for Mina Smallman who has been so resolute and articulate through the loss of her daughters.

It's that to me, not having all the info, he sounds very mentally unwell.

On the basis that you could only do something like this if mentally ill? So therefore..

elgreco · 06/12/2021 21:13

Good.

VikingOnTheFridge · 06/12/2021 18:03

I'm just glad there's a custodial sentence.

Ghostsintheshelf · 06/12/2021 17:51

Good. Nasty little shits.

TyrannysaurusXXrightshoarder · 06/12/2021 16:47

Good.
How long will they actually serve though?
Has it ever come to light how they were discovered to have done this? Presumably someone they showed the images to informed on them? I hope that person/people are not suffering any consequences in their daily life at work.

ArabellaScott · 06/12/2021 16:40

The two policemen who shared images of Nicole and Bibaa were convicted for 2 years and 9 months today.

www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-59474472

OP posts:
EmbarrassingAdmissions · 12/06/2021 10:20

Most deaths murdered women aren't reported nationally at all.

There have been some threads about artist Henny Beaumont's Disappearing Women - a MNer mention that one mother and daughter pair who had been killed were fairly near to her and she hadn't heard about it.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/4220049-disappearing-women-a-beautiful-tribute?msgid=106547110

hoodathunkit · 12/06/2021 10:10

correction

the demon he mede a contract with is listed here

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucifuge_Rofocale

I am unsure of the provenence of this alleged demon and he does not appear in the Lesser Key of Solomon. The grimoire mentioned in the wiki page appears to be of questionable provenence. I am no expert but there are many fake grimoires floating around including several versions of the Necronomicon.

Obviously, like any rational person, I do not believe in there being a bureaucratically structured ranking of ancient demons that can be summoned and forced to reveal secrets, bestow wealth and power etc.

However some cults do believe in such things and it is by no means certain that everyone who believes in such things is mentally ill.

hoodathunkit · 12/06/2021 09:48

The Mail had an article that included a photo of the occult symbols Danyal Hussein had drawn to accompany his contract with "the devil".

The symbols are sigils from the grimoire The Lesser Key of Solomon

The sigils relate to the following demons

Paimon, Bune, Focator and Beleth

The demon Paimon featured in the horror film Hereditary and it is possible that Hussein watched Hereditary, looked up Paimon online and discovered The Lesser Key of Solomon and developed his horrific strategy from there.

I mention this because the sigils he drew and the demon he penned a contract with are all mentioned in the Lesser Key of Solomon (a C17 grimoire, later translations and publications of which can be bought easily online) and were not simply plucked from his imagination.

In fact the sigils for the demons found in Hussein's bedroom can be found via wikipedia, so he would not have even needed to buy the book.

Of course none of this is as important as the fact that 2 wonderful, innocent sisters were horiffically murdered. I am sharing the info about the sigils because posters here have assumed that the alleged murderer must be mentally ill based on his diabolic contract. I have no idea whether he is mentally all but feel that, under the circumstances, we should not jump to conclusions about his motives (if guilty).

NiceGerbil · 12/06/2021 01:08

It's Sarah who is the outlier.

Most deaths murdered women aren't reported nationally at all.

callmemaybee · 11/06/2021 17:33

Speaking of Sarah, it’s quite sad that headlines involving her seem to be more prominent than Bibaa/Nicole even though the trial is ongoing. It’s just another example of the low attention their deaths received

Thelnebriati · 11/06/2021 16:42

Yes, thats the group. I hope they have more self awareness than to pull the same stunt twice.

toffeebutterpopcorn · 11/06/2021 16:27

Didn’t they do this with the Sarah vigil (turned out to be a self promo op for them).

Thelnebriati · 11/06/2021 16:24

You'd think people running a vigil would have asked the family for approval first, thats massively disrespectful.

toffeebutterpopcorn · 11/06/2021 15:56

Reclaim these streets crowd again?

EmbarrassingAdmissions · 11/06/2021 15:56

If it's Reclaim These Streets, I'd be apprehensive that they're staging it for their own purposes rather than as a declaration of support for the family.

PumpkinWitch · 11/06/2021 15:53

There is going to be a vigil for Nicole and Bibaa. I hope it gives some comfort to their mum. I can’t imagine what she has been through, not just with this but with the way they were treated after their deaths.

inews.co.uk/news/uk/bibaa-henry-nicole-smallman-trial-reclaim-these-streets-women-not-front-pages-1038681

NiceGerbil · 10/06/2021 22:04

And shared the images in watsapp group with colleagues.

One reported it. Otherwise no one would know.

callmemaybee · 10/06/2021 22:00

The aspects that shocked me were:

  • he was in the park prior to attacking them for hours, so he could have been stalking them for the entirety of their visit
  • Nicole witnessed him murder her sister, and that her death was more prolonged. She must have been fucking terrified. I’m so angry
  • he posed their bodies

To top it off; the Met couldn’t be bothered to look for them when they were initially reported missing, and officers had the audacity to take selfies with their dead bodies. You just couldn’t make it up, these women didn’t do anything to be treated so disgracefully

NiceGerbil · 10/06/2021 22:00

Thanks Wee.

Tbh and I don't know obv but after the total disaster of the police handling they need a trial to be reported and look we got him and he's going to jail and also distract people from remembering their actions etc.

I am very cynical though.

WeeBisom · 10/06/2021 21:56

@NiceGerbil, he will only go through trial if he is mentally fit to participate. He has to be able to understand what is going on and to take instructions. If he is too mentally unwell to stand trial then he will be treated and stabilised until he can participate. If he is diagnosed with a severe mental illness he can be transferred to Broadmoor or another secure facility (that's what happened to Peter Sutcliffe, I think he was sent to a normal prison and then later transferred.)

NiceGerbil · 10/06/2021 21:49

I mean I'm not a law expert but that's where they put the impossibly dangerous criminals isn't it, and the other facilities that have the same purpose.

NiceGerbil · 10/06/2021 21:48

@WeeBisom

Just to clear up some of the mental illness stuff. In English law, if a defendant is mentally ill that alone doesn't mean he is not guilty of murder. Dennis Nielsen was most likely mentally ill, but he was still guilty. The standard in English law is a very high threshold to pass - in order to have a partial defence to murder by reason of insanity the defendant must have been so mentally ill he didn't appreciate the nature and quality of the act.

There was a case a while ago where a guy had delusions that god told him to kill people. He knew killing was wrong, and knew he was killing people and that was enough to find him guilty of murder. It didn't matter that his reasons for the murder were because he was mentally ill. On the other hand, there was a case where a guy was not guilty by reason of insanity for kidnapping his girlfriend. He literally had hallucinations she was a demon and trapped her inside a room in the house. He had no idea it was his girlfriend he was restraining.

This guy knew quite clearly that he would have to kill women in exchange for money, and that is what he did. He prepared, he stalked them, he came with equipment and he killed them. He knew the nature of the act (stabbing young women) and he knew the quality (that it was murder.) So he cannot benefit from the defence. He also tried to cover his tracks and sought treatment for his injuries afterwards - this again shows he realised that what he did was wrong. It's exceptionally rare that someone succeeds in this defence -I think it's just a handful of successes a year. They may not be focusing on his mental health as they have decided this defence is pointless to run (he is going for 'it wasn't me'.) His mental health issues will be relevant when it comes to mitigation in sentencing.

I don't know why the hang up on this.

It's not about a defence for me.

It's that to me, not having all the info, he sounds very mentally unwell.

If that is the case and he goes through normal process then it could well mean a dodgy trial which could cause problems down the line, and in a standard prison he could well be a risk to himself and others.

Going to a place like Broadmoor where they can keep you there forever (I believe) is surely better all round.

Swipe left for the next trending thread