This is a good thing right? It means that the two sides have their cases heard in court again. However this time the arguments will receive much greater scrutiny and coverage in the media.
Well, as the judge somewhat grumpily says at the end of this judgment - we shouldn't have been spending so long on the particulars of her case, or the details of her belief at this stage. The beliefs clearly pass the "Grainger" tests, and they shouldn't have been looking at her behaviour yet.
For GC people, it's this part of the judgment that's most important - the legal precedent. GC people are protected from discrimination for not believing TWAW, and that TWAM, and acting upon that. (As long as it doesn't stray into harrassment etc).
Whether Maya wins her individual discrimination case is less important generally, although obviously it's important to her and everyone here thinks she deserves it. That case will likely clarify some legal points about what does and doesn't "stray into harrassment". Where is the line, and did she cross it?