Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

R4 now Tuesday 7.51 am

541 replies

somethinginoffensive · 08/06/2021 07:52

Discussing Stonewall.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
junipertree2 · 08/06/2021 17:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Erikrie · 08/06/2021 17:07

Personally, I’m fully supportive of Benjamin’s role as a spokesperson on this topic, he’s exactly the man for the job, and I can’t wait to hear more from him

Oh. Definitely. Do more Benjamin. Loving your work.

HeronLanyon · 08/06/2021 17:07

I agree Sophocles. We could say he should be promoted ASAP !! I definitely want to hear a LOT more from him and others saying the same. Grin

MaudTheInvincible · 08/06/2021 17:05

Just listened Grin

Sophoclesthefox · 08/06/2021 17:02

Personally, I’m fully supportive of Benjamin’s role as a spokesperson on this topic, he’s exactly the man for the job, and I can’t wait to hear more from him Grin

Benjispruce3 · 08/06/2021 16:54

I heard that this morning. What a lunatic that guy was!

highame · 08/06/2021 16:53

There must be a transweb which sends out information telling their allies that these are the facts:

  • transwomen do not pose any threats to women and children, and
never , ever will.
  • Self-id happens anyway, so it doesn't make any difference
  • transwomen can represent women and that's fine
  • women are fine with all of this and those who aren't are just
exaggerating
  • transwomen are only safe in women's spaces
All of this brought before the W&E committee and repeated everywhere. There's more but can't think of it
Scarify · 08/06/2021 16:53

@MsFogi

Wow - Gender critical = Transphobic. Amazing to get on national radio and effectively say that women absolutely cannot discuss the impact of trans rights on women's rights without being labelled as transphobic.
Gender uncritical = misogynistic & homophobic?
Sophoclesthefox · 08/06/2021 16:51

@MsFogi

Wow - Gender critical = Transphobic. Amazing to get on national radio and effectively say that women absolutely cannot discuss the impact of trans rights on women's rights without being labelled as transphobic.
Absolutely.

Is it possible to express any reservations about the goals and ambitions of trans supportive people and organisations without being “transphobic”, and if so, what would that look like?

For any social/ethical/rights issue, it ought to be possible to frame what respectful disagreement would look like. For example, I am passionately pro choice, but from what I know about the opposing position, I could outline what a respectful dissent from that position would look like (even if I ultimately obviously disagreed with it). I could do the same for equal marriage (and I have gay friends who do exactly that), and any number of other issues I can think of.

Per Benjamin’s worldview though, that’s not possible to do here. It is not possible to have questions about any of this without being branded a bigot by people like Benjamin. That’s not the sign of a reasonable position.

ifIwerenotanandroid · 08/06/2021 16:46

www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000wrjn

at 01:50:30

available for 29 days

(In case no-one else has put it up - am only on page 2)

Sophoclesthefox · 08/06/2021 16:40

Oh, I did enjoy that Grin

Benjamin does not interview well.

MsFogi · 08/06/2021 16:39

Wow - Gender critical = Transphobic. Amazing to get on national radio and effectively say that women absolutely cannot discuss the impact of trans rights on women's rights without being labelled as transphobic.

MsFogi · 08/06/2021 16:28

That interview is the gift that keeps on giving - BC incensed that no trans people were at the table but fails to notice that, ironically, there were no women there either (unless potentially Justin was identifying as a woman today).
Thanks to the poster who reminded me to sign up to the LGB Alliance!

SchadenfreudePersonified · 08/06/2021 16:26

I saw a lot of Twitter comments that JW interrupted BC and was abrasive.

Which he wasn't at all. Just kept the discussion on track (as far as he was able with BC who didn't answer a straight question, but instead just propagandised and attempted to put the others on the spot (didn't succeed). If anything it was BC doing the interrupting (and talking over).

IntoAir · 08/06/2021 16:19

Benjamin Cohen is making such a tit of himself

Doing more than that - he was either lying or disastrously misinformed about Stonewall policies about:

  • self-id
  • getting rid of the protected characteristic 'sex' in the Equalities Act
  • getting rid of single-sex spaces

I hope the LGB Alliance makes a complaint about his lies bad information.

Walkingtheplank · 08/06/2021 16:07

Just caught this - laugh out loud funny. Smile
Thank you Justin for not taking any nonsense,
Thank you Simon for distilling the discussion into key issues.

And Ben, we can't thank you enough for showing just how ridiculous your argument is. You proved the feminist point perfectly.

Leafstamp · 08/06/2021 16:05

@Mollyollydolly

Just listening again. "Benjamin Cohan, thanks for your time, Stonewall could have come on but didn't' sounds so neutral but the contempt in his voice! Delicious.
I enjoyed that bit too.
WarriorN · 08/06/2021 15:58

Re India on this morning, I've seen it before but I feel so much more able to see the smoke and mirrors.

🎻 s first of all. A full male career in the bbc reaping all the well publicised benefits of being male and earring a wage as a tv journalist. Hmm.

And the comparison of trans with a baby who's been born with a disability, framing it as "biology gone wrong" and gone wrong for that a baby? That's the intersex appropriation. Low low low blow.

toffeebutterpopcorn · 08/06/2021 15:55

The daily Mail are chortling loudly about it.

BoreOfWhabylon · 08/06/2021 15:52

@McDuffy

I really, really enjoyed that 8 minutes. I am still suppressing chuckles, several minutes on. Might bookmark for future cheering up...
In terms of exposing the looniness in all it's splendour, It ranks right up there with Posie and Harrumph Grin
JediGnot · 08/06/2021 15:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

viques · 08/06/2021 15:47

@WeeBisom

So, David Paisley has just tweeted his outrage that 'gay cis men' spoke over trans people. He recommended Katy Montgomery to the BBC, but the BBC wanted people connected to Stonewall. But I find this anger very telling. He really doesn't seem to care, or realise, that it's just men speaking about a woman's issue.

Freddie McConnell is also mad that journalists are discussing trans people's basic rights and humanity without talking to them. And to be honest the cognitive dissonance is making my head spin. Sorry, Freddy but for years your side has refused to engage in debate and has even made 'no debate' a slogan because your 'existence' is not something that should ever be discussed. There are multiple trans people who have sworn they will NEVER debate this issue. So if trans people refuse to speak about it, you can't very well complain If trans people are left out and their side is left looking like fools.

Very snide comments from Freddy about JW challenging BC about his use of the word cis. I mean, let’s face it Freddy, if anyone mis genders or mis calls you the wrath of the Furies descends in a red mist of pain and hurt feelingz. Insinuating that JW is somehow hiding his “trueself” because he objects, quite rightly , to someone who should know better (both from personal experience and as a journalist whose first priority should be the truth) making assumptions about his identity is beyond spiteful.
McDuffy · 08/06/2021 15:36

I really, really enjoyed that 8 minutes.
I am still suppressing chuckles, several minutes on. Might bookmark for future cheering up...

Lovetomato · 08/06/2021 15:28

NancyDrawed you star, that’s EXACTLY the clip. The aforementioned Ruth Hunt spectacularly downplaying the significance of Self-ID. And Owen finding it hilarious. Please take a look at it if you haven’t seen the clip (at the time code Nancy helpfully gave). I wonder if Ruth and Simon have sat down recently to discuss this issue?

Floisme · 08/06/2021 15:21

[quote EmbarrassingAdmissions]Bunbury has extensive detail on those (and other) tactics:

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3438714-Bunbury-s-Public-Service-Announcement-2[/quote]
Yes Bunbury is very good on dealing with derail attempts. Maybe JW is a fan Grin

Swipe left for the next trending thread