Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Kathleen Stock OBE: Trans Women Aren't Women : A discussion

388 replies

Childrenofthestones · 23/05/2021 13:57

It's a view held by most people, so why has it become so controversial to state that trans women aren't women? On this episode of "So What You're Saying Is..." (#SWYI) we are joined by Prof. Kathleen Stock OBE, professor of philosophy at the University of Sussex and author of the best-selling book: "Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism".

Prof. Stock discusses the issues of sex vs. gender and gender identity, and explains how trans activists, arguing that gender is psychological not physical, now claim that womanhood & manhood are genders in a social, rather than biological, sense.

She discusses the possible motives for Stonewall's decision to become so actively involved in trans rights, as well as the vilification of its outspoken critics such as Germaine Greer and Julie Bindell. Prof. Stock has herself been the target of campaigns to silence, cancel and no platform.

Prof. Stock also discusses the negative impact the more extreme trans rights positions are having on women (changing rooms, public toilets, prisons etc.) as well as the young, and gays & lesbians.

OP posts:
viques · 24/05/2021 10:41

@alankermode

hey there's loads of proof also y'all have changed your views since 77 or your hair cuts you lots are weirdly obsessed with something that will do no harm also your name sounds like a blender
Not a good idea to call out other posters’ names for being household appliances when the first half of your own board name rhymes with what you are in a satisfyingly nominative determinist way.
334bu · 24/05/2021 10:34

Thank you for posting this interview. Interviewer was well prepared and asked all the right questions. Professor Stock was measured and fabulous as always.

MrsBunHat · 24/05/2021 10:30

There are so many of us. Several of my feminist friends have had the same discussion with me. That they went through the wanting to be a boy stage. Now any girl who feels like that, unless she has gender-critical adults around her to help her think about other possibilities, is at risk of being pushed into transitioning, with the risk of having her female body irreversibly damaged and becoming infertile, and worst of all being led to believe this is all about being her “true self” and celebrated and deluded into thinking she’s so happy about it all. We know from detransitioners that they felt this and were totally sure. That makes sense when it’s being pushed at children like this and they are so young.

If I were being ultra cynical and apocalyptic I might wonder how a system that sterilises and medicalises all the most “boyish” girls arose. The ones who would grow up to be feminists, lesbians and GNC women, the ones who would take plum jobs in engineering, science, politics and leadership, because they were not the ones who would be as effectively limited by bowing to gender expectations. Those girls get effectively drawn into a system that neutralises them. They will never be men, or taken as men by men. They will just be women who this process has tried to shove out of womanhood for not being feminine.

Angry
thepuredrop · 24/05/2021 10:22

@alankermode

hey there's loads of proof also y'all have changed your views since 77 or your hair cuts you lots are weirdly obsessed with something that will do no harm also your name sounds like a blender
In which language does the combination of ‘a’ and ‘l’ mean ‘w’?
pollyrocket75 · 24/05/2021 09:40

Campervan69 are you me? Gosh. All of that.

DaisiesandButtercups · 24/05/2021 09:37

Haven’t read the full thread as it seems to have gone off on some kitchen appliance tangent.

I have just watched the full interview. I want to thank Childrenofthestones for sharing it here. It was really interesting and Kathleen was, as ever when I hear her speak, clear and got the most important points across. I thought the interviewer had a very pleasant and concise style too what a pleasure to listen to.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 24/05/2021 08:59

This is the other side of the debate

Yes Grin

WarriorN · 24/05/2021 07:41

Speaking of the 70s, anyone who was in secondary education around 1965- 1977 Could you please help this wonderful student out? Researching second wave feminism (Studying under wor Selena I believe.)

Masters dissertation on second-wave feminism, help needed! www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/4252614-Masters-dissertation-on-second-wave-feminism-help-needed

WarriorN · 24/05/2021 07:37

Viper smoothies are great for the complexion. (Just filter out the twiggy bits first.)

WarriorN · 24/05/2021 07:34

Looking forward to my morning feminist brain boost and my mind is now full off a nest of vipers in a blender.

Accurate, I'll take it.

Grin
ChewtonRoad · 24/05/2021 07:15

In 1977 I had a centre parting, now I have a side parting.
Evidently one's parting is now of vital importance in certain circles (none in which I run): www.vogue.co.uk/beauty/article/the-side-parting-debate

also your name sounds like a blender
If not Vogon poetry (it might be), could it be another "purple monkey dishwasher" as that heard at Springfield Elementary School?

EdgeOfACoin · 24/05/2021 07:12

I am another one who wasn’t born in 1977.

The ageism is quite something to behold. Always.

Eminybob · 24/05/2021 06:54

@Imasoulman if you have come on this thread to present a different side to the debate, please feel free.
“You’re wrong I’m right because I said so” doesn’t do your cause any favours.

TiddyTidTwo · 24/05/2021 06:48

The Blendphobia on this thread is shocking.

Aposterhasnoname · 24/05/2021 06:39

@alankermode

hey there's loads of proof also y'all have changed your views since 77 or your hair cuts you lots are weirdly obsessed with something that will do no harm also your name sounds like a blender
Welp, that’s me convinced, how could I not be converted in the face of such a strong eloquent argument.
FindTheTruth · 24/05/2021 06:31

Us women who went through this and grew up happy to be women are clear examples of how wanting to be a boy did not equal being trans. It just meant we realised being a girl was crap and being a non-girly girl even harder

like that poor 4 year old girl in the news recently.

off to watch Kathleen Stock, thanks OP.

Justhadathought · 24/05/2021 06:25

there are those who have lived to regret it

Justhadathought · 24/05/2021 06:24

You really think people were not transitioning in the seventies

A tiny handful..adult males.......and it was never proposed that you could actually change sex. Transition ( full re-assignment) was seen as the last resort. And even then those who have lived to regret it. A relation of my husband, for example.

Lots of people, however, experimented with expression through clothes, through hair and make-up, through, name change and so on.....but without the enforced pronouns, or push for children to be transitioned.

justawoman · 24/05/2021 05:54

@StillWeRise

not being allowed to wear trousers (and organising a succesful protest!) was a key 1970s experience for me
I wasn’t allowed to wear trousers at my state comprehensive in the late 90s.
WildishBambino · 23/05/2021 23:54

The 70s? My state Catholic secondary school restricted the subjects girls could take into the 1990s, and still won't let them wear trousers.

Delphinium20 · 23/05/2021 23:42

Who the fuck 10 years ago would have though it would be the right thing to talk about vagina havers, and that rapists would be in women's prisons?!

I know...progressSad

StillWeRise · 23/05/2021 23:17

not being allowed to wear trousers (and organising a succesful protest!) was a key 1970s experience for me

ErrolTheDragon · 23/05/2021 23:15

@StillWeRise

speaking of the 1970s this thread has a surprising number of women who remember not being allowed to take various subjects at school (technical drawing, woodwork etc) because they were girls. But you tell the young people of today that, and they don't believe you.
Most young people today wouldn't even know what technical drawing was, would they? DD had to do some, I think as a rite of passage, in her first term of her engineering degree - she said everyone was hopeless at it but the desks were too high for her - so still sexist. GrinMy second form (ie yr 8) form room was the TD room, so although banished to 'domestic science' I had an idea about plan and elevation from what was left on the blackboard.
CharlieParley · 23/05/2021 23:09

@StillWeRise

speaking of the 1970s this thread has a surprising number of women who remember not being allowed to take various subjects at school (technical drawing, woodwork etc) because they were girls. But you tell the young people of today that, and they don't believe you.
I'll have a look at that thread, thanks.

Being forced to take a particular subject in school that the boys were allowed to avoid made me rebel for the first time against sex stereotypes and sex role stereotypes. I was nine. I had zero interest in needlework. But my protest fell on deaf ears.

EmbarrassingAdmissions · 23/05/2021 23:01

@heathspeedwell

On the subject of Vogon poetry, does anyone know how the wonderful Bowlofbabelfish is doing? I used to love reading her posts years ago.
I miss her so much. I should think she's pretty busy with petri dish/mini bowl as well as her wonderfully absorbing research work.
Swipe left for the next trending thread