@Quaggars
It's very comparable with blackface. I have never heard anyone but a genderist asking that the comparison not be made
You can't be looking very hard then, as several people on this thread have said they find it offensive.
The Black Mumsnetters board has had several posters repeatedly saying how offensive it is to compare drag to blackface on several threads.
Not going to link to any, (as don't feel it's my place to link there) if you really are interested you can have a look.
If you use the MN search function and type in drag, you'll no doubt get tons of threads to have a look through, from Chat, to AIBU, to BMN.
As far as I am aware being black and believing gender ideology are not mutually exclusive. I don't think there is a monolithic viewpoint.
Besides I don't care what sex, race, gender a person is, their argument should be evaluated on it merits not on its standpoint epistemology ranking or the oppression score the identity of the person espousing them holds.
I am not undermining the severity of blackface, but it no longer exists. It isn't acceptable in 2021. Drag is not only accepted it is celebrated.
There are comparisons of kind, if not degree.
Engage with the actual arguement rather than hiding behind other peoples intersectional identities.
Removing the total lack of civil equality in the 1930's/40'/50's, which is not disputed, how is Black face different from drag in and of itself?
Why is dressing as a parody of sex for entertainment, different from dressing as a parody of race for entertainment?