Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Ladies and Gents loos to return!

71 replies

Theluggage15 · 15/05/2021 23:12

In the Telegraph: Return of ladies and gents lavatories, as ministers tell architects all new buildings must have separate facilities
Buildings which already had unisex lavatories, which are shared by men and women, also face having to install partitions.

‘These changes will help to maintain safeguards that protect women and the proper provision of separate toilets, which has long been a regulatory requirement, will be retained and improved.‘

Apologies I don’t know how to do share tokens. This is great news!

OP posts:
MarshaBradyo · 16/05/2021 07:48

Great so women finally being recognised, defined and provided for again.

Women - biological women that is. Their own space.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 16/05/2021 07:44

Article is archived here:

archive.li/FpdA1

It makes me very uncomfortable feeling so positive about the Tories Confused

Pota2 · 16/05/2021 07:14

Good. There should also be steps taken to include a gender neutral facility where this is feasible (don’t say it’s a space issue because the same argument was made about women’s toilets and disabled toilets and we got round it). Anyone uncomfortable with a sex-segregated space can use that. Also, I’d like a policy that, where possible, toilets are self-contained rather than cubicles and stalls. For both sexes. I think most people would prefer that level of privacy, eg being able to get undressed to rinse clothing and being able to clean up after a period-disaster.

MidsomerMurmurs · 16/05/2021 06:49

they need women to use them. Otherwise it is just an additional facility for men, which is not what trans activists typically mean by “inclusive”

Women are needed as props

Well this is right, isn’t it. It’s not just about wanting to pee in peace. It’s all about validation and being seen.

Fallingirl · 16/05/2021 01:58

”Our intentions to seek inclusive and available public toilets for trans, non-binary and other gender diverse people does not seek to undermine or compete with women’s rights to also have access to private toilet facilities,” it added. There is no hierarchy of rights – it is a matter of support and access for all.

No one ever had any issue with providing additional mixed sex facilities for those who prefer them.

The issue with demanding “inclusive” toilets for “trans” is that they need women to use them. Otherwise it is just an additional facility for men, which is not what trans activists typically mean by “inclusive”

Women are needed as props.

Anyway, regarding the new rules; what is the definition of a public building? Is e.g the Old Vic public, or can they argue they are private?

RedDogsBeg · 16/05/2021 01:43

GI query some of the givens stated as part of the outline for the review. It states that ‘over recent years there has been a trend towards replacing female-only toilets with gender-neutral toilets’. We would welcome evidence to quantify this statement.

There is plenty of evidence of this happening, but then if GI don't want to look they will resolutely refuse to see it.

Our intentions to seek inclusive and available public toilets for trans, non-binary and other gender diverse people does not seek to undermine or compete with women’s rights to also have access to private toilet facilities,” it added. There is no hierarchy of rights – it is a matter of support and access for all.

Well that is bollocks, where and when have GI been campaigning for additional gender neutral spaces for trans, etc., alongside single sex spaces? They haven't as they have pushed the mantra, along with Stonewall, that toilets should be accessed on the ever shifting, indefinable gender identity which wipes out single sex female only toilets at a stroke.

Disingenuous much?

MrsFin · 16/05/2021 01:36

‘These changes will help to maintain safeguards that protect women and the proper provision of separate toilets, which has long been a regulatory requirement, will be retained and improved.‘

What kind of women though?

Women women, or does that include women with penises?

PastMyBestBeforeDate · 16/05/2021 00:44

There is also little to no evidence that cisgender women feel unsafe in current provided facilities
How so we formalise that evidence? Presumably if one woman writes to her MP then that disputes that. It's 'feels'...

Whatsnewpussyhat · 16/05/2021 00:38

There is also little to no evidence that cisgender women feel unsafe in current provided facilities

There is plenty of evidence that mixed sex facilities are a greater risk to females and children.

ErrolTheDragon · 16/05/2021 00:20

Another thread has a link and longer extract from the telegraph piece - I don't think they do sharetokens.

Well well well ... www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/4246028-Well-well-well

ErrolTheDragon · 16/05/2021 00:13

@persistentwoman

Is the anti women / anti safeguarding tide starting to slowly turn??
Not to mention the 'anti-what the EA laws actually say' tide.
Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/05/2021 00:12

Coincidentally I read this Vice article earlier about the toilet consultation. Spoiler, TRAs weren't happy about women'a wishes and needs being considered:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3geyv/uk-government-accused-of-reigniting-culture-war-over-gender-neutral-bathrooms

There is also little to no evidence that cisgender women feel unsafe in current provided facilities so we are concerned that the government is creating a false narrative by which to exclude trans and GNC [gender non-conforming] people,” We Exist added. “This government is happy to start culture wars in an attempt to divert from their many, many failings in dealing with the pandemic, and this is no different.”

Gendered Intelligence (GI), a charity working to improve the lives of trans people, also disputed the evidence behind the government’s consultation. “Toilet facilities is a key area where trans, non-binary and other gender diverse people face barriers to access,” it said. “GI query some of the givens stated as part of the outline for the review. It states that ‘over recent years there has been a trend towards replacing female-only toilets with gender-neutral toilets’. We would welcome evidence to quantify this statement.”

“Our intentions to seek inclusive and available public toilets for trans, non-binary and other gender diverse people does not seek to undermine or compete with women’s rights to also have access to private toilet facilities,” it added. “There is no hierarchy of rights – it is a matter of support and access for all.”

persistentwoman · 15/05/2021 23:55

Is the anti women / anti safeguarding tide starting to slowly turn??

2Rebecca · 15/05/2021 23:53

Excellent news. I hate gender neutral toilets which were pushed through with no consideration for women

stumbledin · 15/05/2021 23:48

Okay I have just been on another thread about this, and loathe as I am to say anything supportive about the Tories, they have gone out of their way to say the sex means sex.

It is those organisations who have gone through the Stonewall training who say sex means gender.

We should at lead take the opportunity this Blush Tory government has given us and hold buildings, services and whatever to account.

BeReet · 15/05/2021 23:41

@RedDogsBeg

I hope so, but I want an explicit and unequivocal statement from the Government that toilets are segregated on the basis of sex, not gender, and that must be used according to biological sex.
I am extremely pleased with this govt decision but I also have the nagging doubt mentioned here by RedDogsBeg
ChristinaXYZ · 15/05/2021 23:40

And I look forward to seeing builders setting about the loos in the Old Vic in particular.

ChristinaXYZ · 15/05/2021 23:23

I'm pleased to see Lord Lucas (who helped bring so much attention this by speaking in the Lords) already starting to hold the government to account

twitter.com/LordLucasCD/status/1393692717004251138

SirSamuelVimes · 15/05/2021 23:23

Seems like good news. I am cautiously optimistic.

RedDogsBeg · 15/05/2021 23:19

I hope so, but I want an explicit and unequivocal statement from the Government that toilets are segregated on the basis of sex, not gender, and that must be used according to biological sex.

ChristinaXYZ · 15/05/2021 23:19

Fantastic that they are going to regulate for it but then they will need to enforce it.