Because Jimmy saville was left free to abuse a massive number of children while it seems his interests were well known. He had his own room in children's hosps FFS and was free to come and go as he pleased.
John warboys was a prolific sex offender who was able to continue raping women for years even though they had his reg plate etc. They didn't look into it. They turned women away because 'a black cab driver wouldn't do that'.
So what of all those victims?
'It's always obfuscation and whataboutery along the lines of "but but but Jimmy Savile and John Warboys...what about that then?"'
Do you mean to suggest that posters are only talking about those cases and others to deflect? And not because they genuinely think it's a mistake to focus on one group of men above all else, rather than all the men and all the things that are going on?
No one is saying look the other way about the grooming gangs. The way they operate, how they are so able to keep doing it. Why it's still happening. Which men which communities. This is known though isn't it?
And again the focus goes back to the men. What's the actual question? Why are they doing it? We all have a pretty good idea. What does it help though?
And what about all the other victims. Don't they matter? Or are they just handy for 'whataboutery'??? Which is a pretty big accusation. That women on these boards are not being honest, and are using the rapes of women and girls by men under different circs because they have an agenda?