Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

BBC article on Elliot Page

295 replies

Sittinonthesand · 01/05/2021 06:31

I don’t know anything about Page - I’ve only seen the name in the context of being trans, but this article contains several worrying/misleading half truths:

  • talks about ‘top surgery’ without explaining that it = mastectomy (refers to ‘removal of breast tissue instead).
  • talks about surgery as being ‘life saving’ without explaining why.
  • says that trans children aren’t being allowed to play sport and this will lead some to die - doesn’t explain why they might die, doesn’t say that they can play sport but maybe not with the sex they’d like.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Josette77 · 01/05/2021 18:08

When Angelina Jolie had her surgeries because of the BRCA gene people criticized her for overreacting when she didn't yet have cancer. Yet, Elliot Page does it for his mental health and that is apparently brave and amazing.

Letsgetreadytocrumble · 01/05/2021 18:05

@Whatwouldscullydo

lets

I'd say the opposite actually. Ep as a woman was literally erased from existence within 24 hours. The Internet seemed to be fairly active with people who ordinarily wouldn't have given them a second thought but who saw and took advantage of the situation and jumped right on on there announcing their support. Of course it wasn't support for EP more a " yay look at me aren't I wonderful face book/twitter followers I'm.the best ally and the most woke.person here.

None of it was about EP though it was all.about everyone else's need for attention and approval. The person in the middle.of it all.was almost irrelevant.

Well yes, there was a lot of people falling over themselves to ensure that any mention of EP's past female name or presence was completely erased. But as you say, I don't feel like people particularly care about EP themselves, it's just all for virtue signalling purposes.

I don't know, it just feels different to when, say Caitlyn Jenner came out, and was immediately winning 'Women of the Year' awards etc. And the way that some women are so keen to welcome transwomen 'into the sisterhood', you just don't really see it the other way around.

KaleSlayer · 01/05/2021 18:05

I’ve just reported my own post, because I think a lot of us would appreciate an answer on this one.

Let’s hope that answer is provided as quickly then. I was deleted and an email sent explaining within minutes as to why the ‘m’ word was not allowed. Frightening.

buttcrackmcheese · 01/05/2021 18:04

I watched the clip of the interview at the top of the article, did nobody else feel like there was a lot of acting going on? It didn't feel genuine to me.

Snoozer11 · 01/05/2021 18:04

Page has every right to be happy.

But a gay woman becoming a straight man is a form of homophobia and shouldn't be celebrated. Page is responsible for pushing this idea and should be held to account.

It's like old fashioned conversion therapy. But they only want to ban it if it affects trans people.

I read them talking about feeling uncomfortable in a dress. That's fair, but it doesn't anything.

Page is obviously comfortable in a baseball cap - does that mean they think a man who doesn't feel comfortable in a cap should transition?

EmpressWitchDoesntBurn · 01/05/2021 18:02

I’ve just reported my own post, because I think a lot of us would appreciate an answer on this one.

EmpressWitchDoesntBurn · 01/05/2021 18:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted as it quotes a deleted post

AssassinatedBeauty · 01/05/2021 18:00

I don't think many people would watch that interview or other recent appearances by Page, and not think that they look tired, thin and unhappy.

KaleSlayer · 01/05/2021 17:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

terfinginthevoid · 01/05/2021 17:59

I seem to have been deleted for referring obliquely to the thing we are not allowed to talk about.
Even though it is a recognised psychiatric diagnosis.
See DSM-5 302.3

Whatwouldscullydo · 01/05/2021 17:57

lets

I'd say the opposite actually. Ep as a woman was literally erased from existence within 24 hours. The Internet seemed to be fairly active with people who ordinarily wouldn't have given them a second thought but who saw and took advantage of the situation and jumped right on on there announcing their support. Of course it wasn't support for EP more a " yay look at me aren't I wonderful face book/twitter followers I'm.the best ally and the most woke.person here.

None of it was about EP though it was all.about everyone else's need for attention and approval. The person in the middle.of it all.was almost irrelevant.

Atalantea · 01/05/2021 17:57

@Sittinonthesand

I don’t know anything about Page - I’ve only seen the name in the context of being trans, but this article contains several worrying/misleading half truths:
  • talks about ‘top surgery’ without explaining that it = mastectomy (refers to ‘removal of breast tissue instead).
  • talks about surgery as being ‘life saving’ without explaining why.
  • says that trans children aren’t being allowed to play sport and this will lead some to die - doesn’t explain why they might die, doesn’t say that they can play sport but maybe not with the sex they’d like.
Literally says:

Top surgery involves the removal of the breast tissue to create a masculine chest.

WhereYouLeftIt · 01/05/2021 17:54

@NeedNewKnees

I thought Page looked unwell and extremely fragile.
Likewise Sad.
R0wantrees · 01/05/2021 17:54

DerryWitch its @NiceGerbil 's post and I agree, its superb.

Quaagars · 01/05/2021 17:53

I don't know if it's just me, but the reaction to this interview, and Elliot Page's coming out in general seems to be a bit more muted than normal? There just doesn't seem to be the same sort of sharing and 'celebrating' over this that one might think there would be of a fairly prominent Hollywood star coming out as trans.

Really? I've seen loads of articles shared, and praise for "coming out" and discussions all over social media and in MSM (mainstream media) articles.

Or going by the rest of your comment, is this just a way and narrative to paint all women as nobody gives a shit about them and little vulnerable victims?
We're not!
We are all different people, we are not all the same.
I really hate this victim narrative, not just your comment but all the commenting on his appearance, "frail", "thin" "vulnerable" etc.
Has he said he's a victim, or vulnerable?

Minezatea · 01/05/2021 17:53

I was wondering about why he is still playing a part in the umbrella academy that was a female part. Maybe importantly a female part too given that it was the most powerful (probably) of the characters and historically women's power has been denied. Should it not have bee reserved for a female therefore? Or is this move suggesting that trans men are female/ not really men? Seems like an ideological mess and some attention to protecting the 50% (+) of subjugated females within this may be helpful.

IvyTwines2 · 01/05/2021 17:51

@forfucksakenett 'No matter how you look at it, you appear on the red carpet as yourself. You may well represent your workplace and you may well be dressed up but that doesn't detract from the fact that you are you.'

If that's your way of thinking about it, one could say the same of all the roles Elliot has performed too, while they were performing them.

KaleSlayer · 01/05/2021 17:49

Why have I been deleted? Confused I answered a question I had been asked. Dysphoria is a thing !

It’s frightening that I’ve been deleted. I think we all need to be very concerned at the way things are headed.

DerryWitch · 01/05/2021 17:49

[quote R0wantrees]from current thread discussing Guardian coverage of the interview
NiceGerbil made important points which, in my opinion need wider consideration,

"The thing that has leapt out at me for ages around this, and continues to do so. In brief.. (I'll try!)

An artful lot of things with this seem to be about breasts.
Binders/ mastectomies
For males, the surgery that seems to be the main one is implants. For those on hormones like that person in the ? Telegraph, their chest growing is inordinately exciting.

What I know is that
Growth of breasts whatever age you are is the sudden point at which men start looking at you differently. Society starts treating you differently. It's when the leering starts and the ideas like you need to cover up (unspoken, because your own growing body puts you at risk). For right or wrong, that's the message. And the breasts are the most obvious thing.
Men in our society utterly fetishise breasts. That what would you do if you were opposite sex for the day, the first thing lots of men would do is play with their tits.
Breasts are to feed babies but that's really gross to much of society because they're for show for men, not for feeding.
Loads of girls have forever tried to hide their chest shape to stop the way it means they are treated.
Breast ironing is a horrendous thing that is done with the aim of holding off the behaviour of men towards girls once their bodies start developing.

So we have.
Girls especially when breasts start growing and through maybe secondary school age actively wishing they would go away.
From a practical pov even if larger they are a PITA. if you are into sport gymnastics etc they get in the way.
In general one way or another many girls and women are not keen. Ambivalent. Would be comfier in many ways without them.
Meanwhile males who are non binary/trans this seems to be a common number 1 wishlist item.

That puts it in a different context. Where do you want to be in the sex class order? Looker or lookee? Able to walk down the high street with no attention or with eyes subtly or not so subtly up and down up and down? That sort of thing.

And of course implants can be removed. A double mastectomy is a much larger operation removing healthy tissue permanently.

Finally. Why is it seen as not a big deal for girls/ women? Is it because society is used to girls and women trying to alter their bodies to fit in with the male gaze? And girls and women understanding that as they live in society too? Restrictive clothes, uncomfortable shoes. In the past foot binding tight corsetry. Having pubic hair ripped out and the idea of an appt at beautician is 'pampering'. (Yes I know some men do it too).

If you don't want the attention discomfort unpleasant things to do with breasts that happen because, men will be men. Then have them cut off.

Yes obviously some people have sex dysphoria.

This focus on the breasts for both male and female without any analysis or attempt to understand if there's something going on. It's obvious to me.

I suppose it's easier not to think about it too much?"

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/4232660-Guardian-hits-new-low?pg=3[/quote]
Superb post, @R0wantrees.

Letsgetreadytocrumble · 01/05/2021 17:47

*fawned

Letsgetreadytocrumble · 01/05/2021 17:46

I don't know if it's just me, but the reaction to this interview, and Elliot Page's coming out in general seems to be a bit more muted than normal? There just doesn't seem to be the same sort of sharing and 'celebrating' over this that one might think there would be of a fairly prominent Hollywood star coming out as trans.

The reasons for this could be two fold
1)Elliot is female and females don't matter as much so people give less of a fuck.
2) People are finally realising that a 34 year old female cutting off their perfectly healthy breasts because they have such intense hatred for their body is not something to be celebrated and dawned over.

Deathgrip · 01/05/2021 17:44

@SydneyCarton

EP’s Wikipedia and IMDb pages have been updated with “he/him” pronouns, but are film companies required to change their name on the credits of films they have previously starred in, and if not, is this misgendering? IMDb describes Page as the first trans actor to be Oscar nominated, which is rather disingenuous given that Page’s transition happened more than ten years after the nomination.
Bit of trivia for you - the highest grossing films directed by a woman is the Matrix trilogy, despite the fact they were the Wachowski brothers at the time.

Having read some interviews with Page it does seem they’ve experienced gender dysphoria for a long time. I have no issue with people with gender dysphoria transitioning and having treatment if that’s what they want to do. I do find the replacement of their previous name everywhere with their new one a bit jarring, especially things made before the transition, as with The Umbrella Academy.

Quaagars · 01/05/2021 17:41

@KaleSlayer

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.
OK, fair enough, but that still doesn't explain people who aren't trans, who are comfortable in their body, have no dysphoria at all, but would still have a massive disconnect and possible distress if suddenly had the body of the opposite sex. (As I said above, probably gets dismissed as well that's just a thought experiment) it's not really though, don't know how else to describe it but I know for example I definitely would and the fact I would, and clearly lots of trans people experience that too, it clearly exists. Or does it not exist as a "thing" if you don't personally experience it?
forfucksakenett · 01/05/2021 17:40

[quote IvyTwines2]@forfucksakenett

'No it's not a performance as such. It's a place where you present yourself. You're not in character.'

Not really - you are representing the movie you and a whole army of other people have been involved in making, your studio, the film industry, even the designers who have provided the outfit. Many actors now post on instagram showing the team involved in prepping them for the red carpet, and thank all involved. It's not just about them.

These days, too, actors have a direct link to the public - their social media - where we can see their unmediated 'authentic self', should they wish to show it, and many, love it or hate it, are followed around by paparazzi snapping them going to the shops and other mundane activities so we are familiar with what they look like and how they choose to present themselves in their everyday life.[/quote]
No matter how you look at it, you appear on the red carpet as yourself. You may well represent your workplace and you may well be dressed up but that doesn't detract from the fact that you are you.

If I work in the bank then I'm not the bank ffs.

Notagain20 · 01/05/2021 17:39

@Quaagars

Can you say more about the right to be who they are? Thanks

As in, that they're trans.
Which you'll only acknowledge as an answer if you're not like pp who doesn't believe in being trans
(this bit for clarity) What many people do not believe is that there is a naturally occurring condition called 'being trans'.

Genuine question, how do you describe "being trans"? Because that makes this conversation possible. If it means having acute dysphoria about having a female instead of male body, for Elliot, then I would absolutely accept that they are trans by that definition. If it means that they are really a male person, have always been a male person, who was somehow born in a female body, then I will struggle to unquestioningly accept their self definition I'm afraid. Can you see why people will have different views on this, and still all wish Elliot or someone in their position well?