Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Jameela Jamil just tweeted this....

361 replies

GizmoBasil · 14/04/2021 08:06

She's mainly being pulled apart in the comments due to, you know, lying.

No doubt in my mind that she's getting puberty blockers and the contraceptive pill mixed up.

Such a shame as I have been following her since my early 20's and found her feminism very accessible back then.

Am I being unreasonable to say she's talking nonsense??

Jameela Jamil just tweeted this....
OP posts:
transbadger · 14/04/2021 10:13

@Ereshkigalangcleg

to me, that’s what a woman looks like.‘

Apart from when some women look like the biological males they are, eh, Jameela?

Very good point. She should say that the the lovely woman and see how she gets on.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/04/2021 10:12

She's simply a manipulative attention seeker who enjoys causing trouble and playing the victim when she stirs up a response. Twitter has lots of people like this, who play out their dramas online.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/04/2021 10:10

to me, that’s what a woman looks like.‘

Apart from when some women look like the biological males they are, eh, Jameela?

Sillyduckseverywhere · 14/04/2021 10:09

Well I just reported my first tweet!
She would rather insult people and deny deny deny than admit she's wrong.
Sounds familiar 🤔

R0wantrees · 14/04/2021 10:05

Do you know what they consider to be ‘Signs of gender dysphoria’ that children show prior to puberty? I hope it isn’t girls playing with trains and boys wearing pink!!

Boston Chidren's Hospital (via Dr Norman Spack this was the clinic at the forefront of using drugs and cross-sex hormones to disrupt puberty in under 16 year old children)

(extract)
"Children are typically diagnosed with gender dysphoria if they have experienced significant distress for at least six months and at least six of the following:

strong desire to be of the other gender or an insistence that they are the other gender
strong preference for wearing clothes typical of the opposite gender
strong preference for cross- gender roles in make-believe play or fantasy play
strong preference for the toys, games or activities stereotypically used or engaged in by the other gender
strong preference for playmates of the other gender
strong rejection of toys, games and activities typical of their assigned gender
strong dislike of their sexual anatomy
strong desire for the physical sex characteristics that match their experienced gender "
www.childrenshospital.org/conditions-and-treatments/conditions/g/gender-dysphoria/diagnosis-and-treatment

** For gender read sex.

chocorabbit · 14/04/2021 10:05

@ASugarr

Anything that interferes with development will do that. That is why they are taken very carefully and very few young people (at least in the UK) is allowed them unless necessary. Contraception can cause the same effects and are given out regularly. Additionally mental health medication is too. And those are given at an event younger age. I do agree, more research is necessary however it is very unlikely these issues arise.
The Economists title about the subject however (it's just the title, we can quote titles can't we?) said exactly the opposite: "Little is known about the effects of puberty blockers

That has not stopped clinics prescribing them enthusiastically".

It also mentions that British judges ruled that children are unlikely to be able to give meaningful conesent for them and that the NHS recently withdrew its claim that their effects are reversible.

Also that although no comprehensive studies have or have been allowed to happen, alleged effects to now adults include "cognitive deficits, brittle bones and chronic pain in later life". And when tested in animals sheep given blockers could find it very hard to navigate a maze and female mice were much more timid.

As for cross-sex hormones 2018 studies showed that female humans have more chances for cardiovascular disease and men for blood clots and strokes.

www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2021/02/18/little-is-known-about-the-effects-of-puberty-blockers

ASugarr · 14/04/2021 10:01

@MoltenLasagne

Contraception can cause the same effects and are given out regularly.

Which contraception causes any of these side effects associated with Lupron:
Brittle bones, severe bone pain and cracking teeth
Reduced IQ, seizures and in some cases inducing dementia
Cardiovascular impacts including angina and heart attacks (only studied in men but very likely impacting women and children)

All can use heart attacks. They don't effect bone structure however they can cause cancer, large blood clots, strokes and more. Plus if you smoke the likely hood these happen jumps up.
Soontobe60 · 14/04/2021 09:52

@sanluca

Just for info on the Dutch protocol:
  • only 30% of children referred to the Dutch doctors get blockers at all. The rest get the watchful waiting approach. Numbers are increasing but nowhere near what other countries show. You can't just get a referral, it takes time.
  • the Dutch protocol will not give blockers to children who have shown no sign of gender dypshoria prior to puberty as puberty is too confusing for kids and chances on misdiagnosis is too great
  • there is strict follow up. 70-80% desist, the rest go on to cross sex hormones.

It helps if you can read dutch and can read the interviews with Steensma who is appalled at how other countries abuse his research and hand blockers out like candy.

Do you know what they consider to be ‘Signs of gender dysphoria’ that children show prior to puberty? I hope it isn’t girls playing with trains and boys wearing pink!!
MoltenLasagne · 14/04/2021 09:49

Contraception can cause the same effects and are given out regularly.

Which contraception causes any of these side effects associated with Lupron:
Brittle bones, severe bone pain and cracking teeth
Reduced IQ, seizures and in some cases inducing dementia
Cardiovascular impacts including angina and heart attacks (only studied in men but very likely impacting women and children)

NotBadConsidering · 14/04/2021 09:49

@NecessaryScene1

So you can be pedantic about the word “all” but it pretty much is.

I've never heard from a detransitioner who had been on puberty blockers and stopped before cross-sex hormones.

There are lots on YouTube and other places now, but all either desisted before any treatment, or detransitioned after being on testosterone for a while.

The pattern is they either back out before the first step of physical treatment, or they at least as go as far as testosterone, then stop when that's not working and there's no further step.

(I bet if there was a further step after testosterone, most would go onto that. It makes psychological sense - you try everything that's offered to you before you rethink).

Has anyone ever heard from a puberty-blocked non-cross-sex-hormones detransitioner in any media? I've only seen them as very small stats in Tavistock responses.

There was only one in the Tavistock study, and bear in mind that study started years ago, and puberty blockers in that study were started at Tanner Stage 3. Now, in real life, they’re started at Tanner Stage 2 or in some cases I know, before any physical changes are visible and based on a biochemical rise in testosterone.

Once puberty blockers are started, pretty much every child will continue to cross sex hormones. That is why, in the Bell/Mrs A vs Tavistock ruling, the judges advised, regarding consent that children should understand:

i) the immediate consequences of the treatment in physical and psychological terms;
(ii) the fact that the vast majority of patients taking puberty blocking drugs proceed to taking cross-sex hormones and are, therefore, a pathway to much greater medical interventions;
(iii) the relationship between taking cross-sex hormones and subsequent surgery, with the implications of such surgery;
(iv) the fact that cross-sex hormones may well lead to a loss of fertility;
(v) the impact of cross-sex hormones on sexual function;
(vi) the impact that taking this step on this treatment pathway may have on future and life-long relationships;
(vii) the unknown physical consequences of taking puberty blocking drugs; and
(viii) the fact that the evidence base for this treatment is as yet highly uncertain

I genuinely think there are two groups of people with this. There are those who know that children don’t ever go through proper puberty, and would like that discussion to be avoided, and those who are completely naive about what puberty blockers actually mean.

TheVanguardSix · 14/04/2021 09:47

She frequently makes erroneous comments. She's no beacon of wisdom. More like dying embers. She's part of the information flood we're deluged with, with no fact-based knowledge to back up her claims.

OldCrone · 14/04/2021 09:47

That is why they are taken very carefully and very few young people (at least in the UK) is allowed them unless necessary.

Why would it be 'necessary'?

Contraception can cause the same effects and are given out regularly.

The same effects? Do you have some evidence of this?

transbadger · 14/04/2021 09:44

Thanks @YouNoob

And well done to everyone staying above the nonsense this morning.

I'm making berry buns for breakfast this morning but might check back in here and there.

🦡🌈🤍

Soontobe60 · 14/04/2021 09:44

@ASugarr

https://gids.nhs.uk/puberty-and-physical-intervention
The blocker is a physically reversible intervention: if the young person stops taking the blocker their body will continue to develop as it was previously. However, we don’t know the full psychological effects of the blocker or whether it alters the course of adolescent brain development

They are physically reversible in that you can stop taking them, unlike irreversible interventions such as a mastectomy, however as the NHS have stated, the psychological effects, and the effects on the developing brain are not known. In other words, in a female periods that stop due to PBS will most likely return when the PBS are stopped, but the unintended side effect PBS have on other areas of development isn’t certain. Compare it to taking the contraceptive pill. It will disrupt the ability to get pregnant, stop taking it and the ability to get pregnant returns. So, it’s effects on pregnancy are reversible. However, a side effect of taking it is an increased risk of certain cancers. Stopping taking it doesn’t take that risk away, the damage has already been done.

As you’re so good at citing NHS documents, here’s one from the BMJ that tells us the]at PBS do not alleviate negative thoughts in children with gender dysphoria.
www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n356

Dandelionsandskylarks · 14/04/2021 09:40

She’s also a thin shamer. If you’re smaller than she is then she will attack your body whilst claiming that she loves all women’s bodies.

‘I’ve got quite an old-fashioned figure. Back in the Sixties, girls had boobs, a tummy and wide hips, and bigger thighs as well. I think that’s sexy – to me, that’s what a woman looks like.‘

Even quotes like this are offensive - that’s what a woman looks like. Women come in all shapes and sizes, even if they have smaller chests and bottoms, but thanks Jameela.

MysteriousAffairAtStyles · 14/04/2021 09:40

@GizmoBasil

She's mainly being pulled apart in the comments due to, you know, lying.

No doubt in my mind that she's getting puberty blockers and the contraceptive pill mixed up.

Such a shame as I have been following her since my early 20's and found her feminism very accessible back then.

Am I being unreasonable to say she's talking nonsense??

JJ is dangerously stupid, and the epitome of Dunning–Kruger effect.

She’s also been found to be a compulsive liar, especially as regards her early years, so I doubt she’s getting anything ‘mixed up’; rather, she has yet again rewritten a past ‘reality’ that never existed.

justanotherneighinparadise · 14/04/2021 09:39

I was a teenager on the nineties and no one was on puberty blockers. The contraceptive pill for heavy periods -yes, I was on Dianette for bad acne myself, but me and my friends all went through puberty unscathed.

YouNoob · 14/04/2021 09:39

You can see that so many people have taken it as fact and are going to spread it.

ASugarr · 14/04/2021 09:38

Anything that interferes with development will do that. That is why they are taken very carefully and very few young people (at least in the UK) is allowed them unless necessary. Contraception can cause the same effects and are given out regularly. Additionally mental health medication is too. And those are given at an event younger age. I do agree, more research is necessary however it is very unlikely these issues arise.

YouNoob · 14/04/2021 09:36

@transbadger

Hi, can someone link the the thread itself?

🦡🌈🤍

Here you go, 🦡

mobile.twitter.com/jameelajamil/status/1382077389925199872

NecessaryScene1 · 14/04/2021 09:33

So you can be pedantic about the word “all” but it pretty much is.

I've never heard from a detransitioner who had been on puberty blockers and stopped before cross-sex hormones.

There are lots on YouTube and other places now, but all either desisted before any treatment, or detransitioned after being on testosterone for a while.

The pattern is they either back out before the first step of physical treatment, or they at least as go as far as testosterone, then stop when that's not working and there's no further step.

(I bet if there was a further step after testosterone, most would go onto that. It makes psychological sense - you try everything that's offered to you before you rethink).

Has anyone ever heard from a puberty-blocked non-cross-sex-hormones detransitioner in any media? I've only seen them as very small stats in Tavistock responses.

HermitsLife · 14/04/2021 09:32

If it gets her lots of lovely delicious cookies what does it matter?

She's on the right side of history and when the law suits and class actions start to pile up, she can just re write it. 💁

transbadger · 14/04/2021 09:32

Hi, can someone link the the thread itself?

🦡🌈🤍

Tibtom · 14/04/2021 09:30

@ASugarr

The initial medication though is reversible. Yes the side effects make a difference however all medication does that.
The impact on bone density, height, brain development, sexual function, fertility etc are not 'side effects' of puberty blockers - they are what the drugs are designed to do. These are things that develop as part of puberty so if you block puberty then you are intentionally blocking these too.
R0wantrees · 14/04/2021 09:28

As well as the contraceptive pill its possible that girls with heavy periods could have been prescribed Mefenamic acid.

www.nhs.uk/conditions/heavy-periods/treatment/

Swipe left for the next trending thread