Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Biological sex is apparently - ambiguous.

58 replies

andyoldlabour · 01/04/2021 18:39

Yes, you read that correctly. How anyone can make a statement like that is beyond me. But the person in the following video states it quite confidently.
Words fail me.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Mugginyouleftrightandcentre · 02/04/2021 21:00

@R0wantrees

Its a good exemplar of coercive-control pattern behaviour.
That's exactly what I thought when I watched that clip.
Frogartist · 02/04/2021 20:53

@ListeningQuietly

Frog No idea if its feminine or not. Cocaine it certainly is.
Oh!
ListeningQuietly · 02/04/2021 20:36

Frog
No idea if its feminine or not.
Cocaine it certainly is.

Frogartist · 02/04/2021 19:56

@ListeningQuietly

I just re watched that video. A lot of sniffing going on Hmm
Yes, not very stereotypically feminine.
dyslek · 02/04/2021 19:51

Thats an unambiguous voice.

Mumofgirlswholiketoplaywithmud · 02/04/2021 19:46

@murmurflation

Wow that vegan feminists thing is interesting. It seems to start with a coherent if slightly mad argument that feminism should reject all the concepts of feminine and masculine and of men and women - so noone is a woman, they might be a person with a uterus but they're all persons.

(That would seem to make it impossible to transition. )

Then I think it jumps straight to TWAW and the central importance of affirming this . So, for ideological reasons, women are not women, but persons, but transwomen are women. People with uteruses should reject the woman label but people with penises should claim it. This step does seem mad to me - please debate this if it makes sense to you.

Yes, it goes around in a circle where in the end it does accept that even if you don't call the milk producing cow a female, it will still be the cow which produces milk that will be exploited. (Except now it is as if part of the language to describe that is lost). You are left with "persons with uteruses".

But how do we name these persons with uteruses who happen to also be the persons who produce the milk (the article has no answer).

Strangeststrangment · 02/04/2021 12:43

I'm vegan so know a lot about the dark side of animal agriculture.
Arguments of whether vegan is the right thing to do aside, dairy and egg production does absolutely use female animals as a commodity. They are the machines that produce the products. It's fact. Male animals have their own problems, as they are generally discarded due to not being useful to the industry.
How on earth anyone who claims to be vegan can insert themselves into animal suffering is beyond me.
It's kind of annoying being lumped in with people who don't really care about animals but just enjoy the label.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 02/04/2021 11:52

If you think it’s clothes or beliefs or affectations that make you a man or a woman, you are a sexist, and seriously out of touch with reality.

Hear hear Heather!

murmurflation · 02/04/2021 11:43

Wow that vegan feminists thing is interesting. It seems to start with a coherent if slightly mad argument that feminism should reject all the concepts of feminine and masculine and of men and women - so noone is a woman, they might be a person with a uterus but they're all persons.

(That would seem to make it impossible to transition. )

Then I think it jumps straight to TWAW and the central importance of affirming this . So, for ideological reasons, women are not women, but persons, but transwomen are women. People with uteruses should reject the woman label but people with penises should claim it. This step does seem mad to me - please debate this if it makes sense to you.

ErrolTheDragon · 02/04/2021 10:16

Thanks NS1 - a very nice remedial evolution lesson for the ignorant or confused.Smile

NecessaryScene1 · 02/04/2021 09:43

Heather Heying laying down some reality:

HH: Newsflash: it is precisely your biology—at least 500 million uninterrupted years of it—that makes a man a man or a woman a woman.

HH: If you think it’s clothes or beliefs or affectations that make you a man or a woman, you are a sexist, and seriously out of touch with reality.

Respondant: Are you sure about the "500 million uninterrupted years"?

Respondant: That takes us back to the Silurian, when we were primative fish.

Heather spells out exactly how sure she is:

twitter.com/HeatherEHeying/status/1377805849888923650
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1377805849888923650.html

Wrongsideofhistorymyarse · 02/04/2021 08:18

Oh dear, the usual nonsense.

Justhadathought · 02/04/2021 08:11

so as to fit in with the crowd

Justhadathought · 02/04/2021 08:11

Anyone care to analyse who so many women and girls are into this stuff? The Crucible keeps popping into my head

A combination of:

  1. Not having yet been exposed to the realities of life as a woman in a female body ( pregnancy, childbirth, motherhood, inequities at work and so on). Although a few seem to have been waking up to the vulnerabilities of women, recently, in response to the Sarah Everard murder

  2. Living in ivory towers of academia - relatively shielded, and invested in ideological discourse

  3. Being more than keen to be on the 'right side' and be ideologically pure and consistent son as to fit in with the crowd ( this is a very big driver for many). But one day most will wake up ( point1) - and re-evaluate in the light of experience.

highame · 02/04/2021 08:00

Anyone care to analyse who so many women and girls are into this stuff? The Crucible keeps popping into my head

Mumofgirlswholiketoplaywithmud · 01/04/2021 21:45

www.collectivelyfree.org/the-womyns-club-and-transphobia/

Saw this a while ago... And now that the term "biological sex" is problematic it does remind of the vegan feminists..

Mumofgirlswholiketoplaywithmud · 01/04/2021 21:41

@Justhadathought

Its a good exemplar of coercive-control pattern behaviour

Holding everyone hostage for the purposes of validating identity.

How precarious!

If the term "biological sex" is now hate speech, then how can you have any meaningful discussions about fairness in sports.... Oh wait... You now can't... Maybe that's the plan..
Nameitychangity · 01/04/2021 21:36

Sometimes I think that THEY think, if they say the same thing over and over again ad nauseum, it somehow makes it true. Almost as if they need to jeep repeating it to themselves to give it validation.
However, it will never be true, and really, even they know it.
There is NO ambiguity about biological sex. large gametes or small gametes. There has never been, and will never be, another kind. No-one has ever produced both.
Saying words doesn't make it true. And that's all there is to it really. In 100'000 years time, there will still be males and females. Reproducing to produce other males and females. There is no ambiguity, sorry.

ListeningQuietly · 01/04/2021 21:27

That video made something click for me on the
Trans Women are Women
argument
and passing as another identity

Use a sound recording
remove all visual cues

I suspect that almost all women and most men will be able to work it out in seconds

ChewtonRoad · 01/04/2021 21:26

Biological sex is an ambiguous word that ... says nothing about our sense of self nor our holistic physical characteristics throughout the course of our lifetimes. I rather think that women's distincitive sex says quite a lot about our sense of self in that how we are treated is determined by our sexed bodies and our physical characteristics. But then the person who said that cannot know such things because of, you know, biological sex.

Trying to discuss reality with the person making the video brings to mind Jurassic Park III "oooh, aaah, that's how it always starts. Then later there's the running and the screaming"

Strangeststrangment · 01/04/2021 21:23

It's ok, I speak raptor.
Roar, roar, bark, shriek.
'That Ellie is pretty cool, let's not eat her face.'
'I concur, dinosaurs eat man, women inherits the earth'.

Scepticaltank · 01/04/2021 21:14

No! The rapters defo had a plan.

ErrolTheDragon · 01/04/2021 21:12

Incidentally if all the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park are female it passes the Bechdel test.

I don't think the dinosaurs talked to each other.Grin

MichelleofzeResistance · 01/04/2021 21:10

The 'obsession' is with protecting women's rights and children's safeguarding from obfustication like this intended to remove necessary sex based definitions.

If there was mutual respect and acceptance that these things cannot be dismantled for those who would prefer not to be constrained by the idea of sex without forcibly dismantling rights, protections and the meeting of needs for others - and largely others with much less political clout and voices and protections in law -

this board could go back to sleep, there'd be no problem, and we'd all be a lot happier. Live and let live has to happen on both sides.

Strangeststrangment · 01/04/2021 21:03

We'll that was the mistake they made in Jurassic Park, 'cause, you know, frogs.
Incidentally if all the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park are female it passes the Bechdel test.

^But again, how do you know they're all female? Does somebody go out into the park and pull up the dinosaurs' skirts^

Swipe left for the next trending thread