You'll find that men can be quite varied and creative in exactly which of women's rights offend them, and which they don't care enough about to oppose.
Thus, you'll get religious conservatives who espouse sexist roles, believe women should know their place, oppose abortion rights, but find nonconforming children so offensive that they prefer them to transition rather than be a butch lesbian girl or an effeminate gay boy. Their view of women is that we are explicitly a subordinate role.
And then at the other end of the spectrum, are extreme 'liberals' who are disinterested in removing abortion rights, because it affords them a tremendous opportunity to commandeer dialogue about female biology and insist that there is no such thing as a female body or female reproductive rights, or women's healthcare. Their agenda is to negate the existence of the female sex class, deny female bodily needs, and make it impossible for us to discuss ourselves in a way that distinguishes us from them.
They're both simply two sides of the same misogynistic coin.
The first acknowledges our sex's bodily existence so they can then shackle us to their chosen limitations. And they are so wedded to those limitations and conformity that they'll sometimes make an exception for the nonconforming child or adult in order to shunt them into conforming to the opposite set of rules. But the rules must stand.
The second prefers to control our ability to talk about ourselves, distinguish ourselves from them, or exclude them in any way. They'll allow us bodily autonomy (for now) so long as we accept their price, which is that our bodies, lives and sex become nameless, and all our uniquely female needs are rebranded as universal human needs.
Of course, once the second achieve the complete dismantling of our ability to discuss our sex, they would hypothetically be free to go on to then rescind our bodily freedoms like abortion rights, on account of it no longer being a particular legally protected need of a particular sex, but instead a universal human state that men also have a say in.
And there won't be much we can do at that point if the biological sex class formerly known as women has suddenly disappeared from all our laws, and been replaced with self identified'women' who can and do speak for us and against our interests, because they are not in fact our sex at all.