Crispin Blunt MP ordered to apologise for breach of parliamentary rules over attempt to make secret deal on self-ID

Digging around re Kaleidoscope Trust in Companies House and the Charities Commission is quite interesting

Such an important disclosure. This demonstrates precisely how all the removal of women's rights to safe places and diminishment of child safeguarding standards. At the behest of a small group of unrepresentative adults in positions of power and influence.

The outcomes of the forthcoming court cases and FOIs are going to be so revealing about how this lobbying has happened.

Blunt is the one who spoke out against banning poppers, as they are used by some gay men.

Can't see him campagning much for the women in his constiituancy though.

That wasn't referring to Blunt

Little joke...ha!

Gosh

And well done OP

heavily into the S+M scene. He was a client of mine

Really?

What is it that's motivating Crispin Blunt? He seems a very unlikely trans ally

Many gay men automatically see this as being the same as the gay rights struggle......and have very little obvious concern or understanding for women's issues.

Wouldn't surprise me if Crispin wants to come out as something else hence the push for self-id, no medical diagnosis required, no checks required, no hormones or any other physical changes required.

I did think that Mrs Blunt's experience possibly had something in common with those of some of the transwidows. It also made me think of one ultra-straight, Bible-bashing man I know who came out in his 40s and is now a deeply misogynist gay man heavily into the S+M scene. He was a client of mine.

Bloody hell Red. well if it happens, you saw it first.

what I don't understand is, how does a man come out as gay at age 50 and decide to go all in for queer theory gender ideology. I don't get it. he realises he's same-sex attracted at 50 and then pushes Stonewall version (that's homophobic) campaigning to remove sexual orientation from the equality act and remove sex based exemptions. What is it with these men?

Wouldn't surprise me if Crispin wants to come out as something else hence the push for self-id, no medical diagnosis required, no checks required, no hormones or any other physical changes required.

Friends say Victoria Blunt - a former banker, and the daughter of a wealthy American - felt betrayed because she had sacrificed her career and used her fortune to support her husband's political life.

I bet she feels betrayed, poor woman.

Good news.

Anyone going to open a book on how long it will take for GEO to stop being a Stonewall Champion?

Just had a thought. I wonder if all those MP's who have been doing secret deals etc., are now feeling a bit twitchy. Stella might be feeling like she needs to look carefully at what she's been cooking up with Stonewall. Not saying she has done anything to contravene Standards in Public Life, but there might be a few feeling a little uncomfortable.

As u were

Mr Blunt, 50, said: 'It is also clear that there is a much greater strand of homosexuality than of heterosexuality which depends for its gratification on the exploitation of youth.'

Hmmmm.

WTAF.

I feel very sorry for Victoria, if this bit from the DM article is accurate:

Friends say Victoria Blunt - a former banker, and the daughter of a wealthy American - felt betrayed because she had sacrificed her career and used her fortune to support her husband's political life.

According to that Daily Mail Crispin Blunt, before he came out as gay, is on record as saying in a debate in the HoC:

homosexuality is 'not equivalent to heterosexuality'.

Mr Blunt, 50, said: 'It is also clear that there is a much greater strand of homosexuality than of heterosexuality which depends for its gratification on the exploitation of youth.'

Hmmmm.

I think it would be very enlightening.

what I don't understand is, how does a man come out as gay at age 50 and decide to go all in for queer theory gender ideology. I don't get it. he realises he's same-sex attracted at 50 and then pushes Stonewall version (that's homophobic) campaigning to remove sexual orientation from the equality act and remove sex based exemptions. What is it with these men?

That is a good point - these older gay men like CB and Michael Cashman are going all out to erase their own existence in law and remove their own hard-won rights and protections - eh??

Or are they relying on the fact that any potential partner they have will also have signed up to the ideology and will have a declared 'gender identity' which corresponds to their sex and the relationship will therefore be protected under the Stonewall definition of gay being same-gender attracted??

“It was my judgement that if this paper could be communicated to the Government privately, and as representing a wide collective agreement, they would be more likely to adopt it as theirs”. Publishing the document and making it open to public debate while the government was still considering its response “would have undermined our political strategy”.

Translation: they might have been encouraged to think about alternative perspectives and interpretations, to recognise that other groups exist with alternate views, and to balance the needs of other people equally, which would have undermined Crispin's personal agenda.