Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Mumsnet Says They Are Trans Friendly; What do you think?

790 replies

Nightinghawk · 03/03/2021 15:22

I’m coming over from Twitter since @/MumsnetTowers has encouraged people to join, promising that they would not ban people for using the word “cis” and also that they think “Campaigning against trans people’s existing human rights and legal protections is transphobic” is “an interesting question and a debate [they’d] welcome seeing on the boards.” When asked if they believe that trans women are women, trans men are men, and nonbinary people are nonbinary, they responded with “We believe adults have a right to say what they think about matters of active public debate.” However, they do say they do not tolerate hate speech, malicious content, sweeping negative generalizations, derogatory or aggressive content on their site.

Given the conflicting messages I’ve seen from them in the past, and the fact that they to this day think campaigns against trans people’s rights could in any way not be transphobic and their hesitance to affirm trans people’s autonomy in our self-description and our gender(s), I’m hesitant to believe that Mumsnet the site is actually trans friendly. I mean this as no disrespect to the mod team or others in position of authority; it is merely my opinion (and lived experiences) that any online forum that doesn’t immediately consider campaigns against trans people’s rights as transphobic tend to have (accidentally or otherwise) cultivated a transphobic customer base on their forums. I say this as a trans person who has been leveled all kinds of harassment in a variety of online forums, where those which had not condemned transphobia had immensely more transphobia in quantity and in vitriol.

All this is to say, I’d like to hear your (Mumsnet’s users’) opinions on the matter. Is Mumsnet really a trans friendly space? Do you believe that advocating against trans people’s existing rights is transphobic or anti-trans? Do you think these existing rights for trans people are “interesting” enough for “debate”? Do you think the term cis should be censored? Am I safe asking for/providing advice here as a trans person? Why? Why not?

For reference: I am nonbinary trans and use xe/xem pronouns. I understand they can be difficult to use or to remember to be used for some people. If you don’t want to use my pronouns, then please use my username: Nightinghawk, or NH as shorthand.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
jules0607 · 03/03/2021 19:01

I’m on mn because I’m a mum. I do not know what cis is, nor do I need to know, am not interested.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/03/2021 19:00

I recommend doing some research on nonbinary identities

And I recommend doing some research on the history of feminism and women's global oppression.

MrsKeats · 03/03/2021 18:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ThinkIveFoundYourMarbles · 03/03/2021 18:52

I think it's quite the assumption to say that I don't identify with womanhood. Nonbinary /=/ agender. To be incredibly simplistic about it, I find myself to be woman, man, and other. I recommend doing some research on nonbinary identities before making assumptions about someone's connections to gender(s).

In fairness, OP, you were asked by several posters early on what you meant by 'nonbinary trans'. You didn't reply.

There are dozens of other great questions and comments from posters on this thread...all unanswered. I fear you are, indeed, yet another poster here not to debate but to scold us for non-compliance.

Faffertea · 03/03/2021 18:52

As others have said, Intersectional Feminism was originally exploring how other factors such as being black, disabled or poor also impacted on the oppression of women. It now seems to be about needing to include male people. Similarly radical feminism is based in the belief that women are oppressed by our biology and seeks to address the origins of that (with radical relating to the word root rather than meaning extreme, again hijacked as a way of making gender critical feminists appear marginal).
Trans exclusionary, from my experience at least, is again used in a frog story fashion (to put it mildly) and what many people who use the term mean is transwomen are excluded because, for some reason, transmen always seem to be forgotten. This conveniently ignores the fact that one of the biggest areas gender critical feminism is concerned about is why so many girls and young women (aka females) are identifying as trans and non-binary and seeking to understand s the dissonance they feel with the female sex in the hope of improving the society that creates these situations. Which, to me at least, seems quite the opposite of being trans exclusionary.

TalkingtoLangClegintheDark · 03/03/2021 18:50

given that I believe that trans women are women, it's very important for trans women to be included in that intersectionality

That’s a very misogynistic belief though, IMO, which is why I’m proud I don’t share it. I see people who espouse this view as inherently misogynistic and therefore the opposite of feminists.

And it’s logically indefensible. What does the word “woman” mean, OP? What is the precise, accurate, objectively true, non-circular definition of the word “woman” according to which TWAW?

Why should the movement for the liberation of (biologically) female people from oppression by (biologically) male people suddenly start to include and even centre some of those biologically male people? It’s absurd. And it’s just another facet of that oppression of female people by male people.

All I see you doing is promoting the same old patriarchal hierarchy of males first, females last. The axis of oppression is and always has been sex, not “gender identity”, and your ideology embeds that yet further. It’s hateful.

TheMostBeautifulDogInTheWorld · 03/03/2021 18:48

OP You'll probably find quite a lot of your questions answered in Mumsnet's own guidelines which you can find here: www.mumsnet.com/info/trans-rights-moderation-policy

Winesalot · 03/03/2021 18:48

[quote PearlescentIridescent]@Winesalot and yet peoplw frequently do do those things or say something along the lines of "If I say what I really think I will be banned".[/quote]
Yes. Because there are certain subjects and words that cannot be used even when they are completely relevant to the topic. If you read widely on this board you would know what topics these would be.

You would also know that there are trans people who are happy to discuss some of those topics (even as they relate to themselves) and agree. However, we are still not allowed to discuss them or name them here.

Carouselfish · 03/03/2021 18:47

Men / women enjoying interests, behaviours, appearance, names stereotypically seen in the opposite sex = great.

Men / women doing this and truly believing they are the opposite sex because of it = if it's not hurting anyone else and genuinely improving their life and mental health, great.

Men / women doing this, truly believing they are the opposite sex because of it and insisting I have to believe it too and use all their terms to define myself = as unacceptable as any other personal belief being forced upon someone else. I have no phobia or hatred for people believing what they like, Christians, Jews, flat earthers but I'm not about to say their beliefs are real to me and humbly identify myself in a day to day context as sinner, shiksa, round earther or cis.

Neotraditional · 03/03/2021 18:42

@Nightinghawk how can you be nonbinary and trans? Please explain what it was you transitioned from and to? How does that work if you don’t have a gender?

OvaHere · 03/03/2021 18:38

I define womanhood as sex based. I'm guessing you define womanhood as sitting somewhere on a genderqueer spectrum that anybody can identify with regardless of their sex.

I fail to see how this progresses feminism or would help women and girls in the global south, for example, who are incredibly oppressed on the basis of their sex.

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 03/03/2021 18:30

Nonbinary /=/ agender. To be incredibly simplistic about it, I find myself to be woman, man, and other. I recommend doing some research on nonbinary identities before making assumptions about someone's connections to gender(s).

"Non-binary (also spelled nonbinary) or genderqueer is a spectrum of gender identities that are not exclusively masculine or feminine‍—identities that are outside the gender binary."
(Wikipedia)

That seems similar to most definitions I have seen? As far as I can see pretty much everyone on the planet is non-binary - am I wrong?

JaneJeffer · 03/03/2021 18:29

I find myself to be woman, man, and other
Can you tell us more about this?

Nightinghawk · 03/03/2021 18:25

@GCAcademic

I think feminism has to be intersectional in order to be true to it's end goal of equality and equity,

Why do have a stake in defining feminism at all, given that you don't identify with womanhood? I mean, it's like me going onto the Black Mumsnetters board and telling them what anti-racism should consist of. I disagree that feminism should centre either people who don't identify with womanhood or who identify with a stereotype of it. It's a total distraction from dealing with the many and very real problems that women face. There is plenty enough for us to do dealing with female people's rights without having to centre people who are not female or don't identify as such.

I think it's quite the assumption to say that I don't identify with womanhood. Nonbinary /=/ agender. To be incredibly simplistic about it, I find myself to be woman, man, and other. I recommend doing some research on nonbinary identities before making assumptions about someone's connections to gender(s).
OP posts:
StillWeRise · 03/03/2021 18:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

WeeBisom · 03/03/2021 18:12

Hey OP, just picking up what you said here: "I think feminism has to be intersectional in order to be true to it's end goal of equality and equity, and given that I believe that trans women are women, it's very important for trans women to be included in that intersectionality."

Intersectionality, as I understand it (but it's been a while since I read Crenshaw) is that black women are never oppressed separately as black people and as women, but intersectionally as 'black women'. Their blackness intersects with their womanhood to create a unique form of oppression. Can you explain what characteristics are intersecting in the case of trans women in order to create a unique form of oppression? Also, intersectionality is simply a tool for analysing oppression. It isn't a kind of feminism in its own right.

The problem is , as I see it, I'm not a postmodernist feminist. I'm far more aligned theoretically with old school radical feminism. This means that I simply can't agree that trans women are part of the category 'woman'. This doesn't mean they lack human rights, or deserve oppression.My theory of gender is simply different from yours, and I don't see why it necessarily follows from that that I must be a bigot, or that I want the worst for trans people.

SunsetBeetch · 03/03/2021 18:06

@Rosannarosannadanna

I think feminism has to be intersectional in order to be true to it's end goal of equality and equity

Its.

Pedants' Corner is thattaway >>>>
MrsBrunch · 03/03/2021 18:01

This one still makes me chuckle

sexual technics

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/03/2021 17:58

Does anyone remember this thread?! It was hilarious

I missed that one Grin it looks great, have bookmarked.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/03/2021 17:56

I don't actually think this sub is very good at debate.

It's not a "sub". This isn't Reddit. It operates in a different way. And if you think TRAs don't use anecdotes and aren't emotive in their arguments, you aren't looking very far. This is the feminism and women's rights board. It rightly centres women and girls. Trans issues are only relevant to this board insofar as they impact women and girls. That's why we discuss them here.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/03/2021 17:52

I think feminism has to be intersectional in order to be true to it's end goal of equality and equity, and given that I believe that trans women are women, it's very important for trans women to be included in that intersectionality.

To be truly intersectional, it's necessary to recognise female sex as an axis of oppression, as it has been for millennia. Yet trans activists often refuse to do this?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/03/2021 17:50

If you identify as non-binary, may I respectfully ask what your interest in feminism is, and why you believe you know what's best to progress it? Thank you.

This is a really good question.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/03/2021 17:47

For reference: I am nonbinary trans and use xe/xem pronouns.

Can you possibly explain what that means, and why you use those pronouns?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/03/2021 17:46

This reply has been deleted

Post references deleted post Talk Guidelines.

RedKite96 · 03/03/2021 17:43

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.