Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Creator of “assigned male” comics is a “little”

135 replies

HermioneWeasley · 23/02/2021 19:58

Statement here. Basically a “little” is an adult baby fetish. Sophie draws their image as a young girl and fantasises about sleep overs with other little girls where they talk about their genitals. Anyone else think this has more red flags than a Chinese communist party shindig?

Creator of “assigned male” comics is a “little”
OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Ereshkigalangcleg · 23/02/2021 20:51

There's one place that has more information on this.

Yes I can imagine.

OvaHere · 23/02/2021 20:50

Ovarit has a long thread on this which might be more informative. It's difficult to know what can be said here without being deleted but there is quite a lot to say.

Original poster
HermioneWeasley · 23/02/2021 20:43

The comics depict Sophie’s character having made up sleep overs with little girls, and in at least one, they are discussing their genitals (Sophie explains to the girls that Sophie’s penis is just a big clitoris)

OP posts:
Lockheart · 23/02/2021 20:36

Sophie... fantasises about sleep overs with other little girls where they talk about their genitals.

I am not familiar with the comics, but I can't see anything in that statement which indicates this is the case.

If everyone participating is of legal age and happy to be there, I don't care what people do in private.

VexedofVirginiaWater · 23/02/2021 20:33

I haven't read any of their stuff - so can't comment on that (although I suspect I wouldn't agree) but as for the sleepovers with little girls - this does depend on whether these "little girls" are other like-minded adults. If they are, and these sleepovers take place in private, then I don't see a problem. If not, then that's a different matter.

MechantGourmet · 23/02/2021 20:31

Personally, my idea of "staying classy" is not to discuss my sexuality or proclivities in public.

ArabellaScott · 23/02/2021 20:31

Is this part of the 'acceptance without exceptions'?

TirisfalPumpkin · 23/02/2021 20:24

Don’t worry, it’s definitely not sexual. Having a child persona that is hung up on adult sexualities and genitalia is fine. Lego & primary colours, that’s what it is about.

nauticant · 23/02/2021 20:18

There's one place that has more information on this.

MichelleofzeResistance · 23/02/2021 20:05

No kink shaming. Bring your whole self to work. Sex positive. This has all been on the cards right from the start. After all, once you've established in law that biological reality is a personal choice in sex, and involving other people in your personal experiences is an inclusion issue no one should object to, the precedent is there for other choices too. Age, race and disability. The communities exist for all three, it's the obvious next step.

Swipe left for the next trending thread