How many women (or men) identify as cisgender?

Or the man could say that he was just a man and the transwoman a transwoman.

That works too

However, a man can distinguish himself from a transwoman by saying he is a cisgender male and the transwoman is a non cisgender male

Or the man could say that he was just a man and the transwoman a transwoman.

There is no need for cis at all.

If cis is all important to some, how about they call themselves non cis women/non cis men? Job done.

I’m happy with woman to describe me. I don’t need no cis.

Calling myself cis isn't a problem for me. It may be a problem for you but doesn't trouble me in the slightest.
I'm as much cis as I am European.

Of course you are if talking about yourself and a transman. Both of you are female and you identify with your sex and a transman does not. Although strictly speaking the transman should call themselves a transgender woman. Your cisgendershio cannot be used to distinguish yourself from a transwoman as you don't share the same set, in this case sex. However, a man can distinguish himself from a transwoman by saying he is a cisgender male and the transwoman is a non cisgender male.

No...cis is basically stamping me with a stereotype of (woman) gender
Fought all my life to battle impacts of gender stereotype of my sex. ain’t going to roll over and accept someone gender stereotyping me now

I'm not sure "European" is particularly helpful given European is neither an ethnicity nor a legal status.

I think Sionnach is having a bit of a rough ride. I accept their right to identify as CIS if they want.

However I expect the same acceptance that I absolutely do not identify as CIS and many others on this chain feel the same.

I can't claim to understand the rationale. Personally I am offended when referred to as CIS as I don't believe I need a qualifier within the women's bracket. But I think in part my concern is that it reinforces stereotypes, i'm a woman and I like baking but I also like tree climbing and riding a motorbike and I don't want those things denied to a girl unless she classes herself as a man, manly, masculine etc. Similarly I don't believe my pink loving, makeup wearing son needs to be a girl to make those choices. Gender just seems like old fashioned stereotypes for people who weren't born in the 80's and lived through the breaking of boundaries and burning of stereotypes via Bowie, Adam and the Ants, Boy George, Annie Lennox, Duran Duran etc. Very sad for them really.

This one of those things that one person being ok with cannot over ride others saying No. Similar to one person being ok with unisex bathrooms can't override other women's requirement to keep sex based spaces

Quite, merrymouse. That's where I am with it.

People are likely to respect your choice for yourself if you in turn respect their choice for themselves.

I think 'respect' is going too far. Maybe 'accept people's absolute right to have strange ideas that they can't explain as long as they are harmless'.

You can call yourself whatever you like Sionnach. You can equally call yourself maverique, scoliosexual, whatever niche labels you want to apply to yourself, obviously. It doesn't bother me, it's just clear that nobody really has any decent arguments for why the average person should adopt the label "cis". I won't be joining you, for the clear reasons I've stated.

This was also in the OP

"I'm interested in any evidence or arguments which would either support or refute my statement."

'Able bodied' isn't an identity either. People have or don't have disabilities regardless of their identity.

It really doesn't matter whether you 'bother me'. I'm just a stranger on the internet. However, it might be helpful for you to be aware that your concept of identity is offensive.

I suppose it comes down to whether or not you feel an entitlement to forcibly label other people whether or not they agree, consent or identify with the label you have chosen for them.

Call yourself whatever you like. People are likely to respect your choice for yourself if you in turn respect their choice for themselves.

When it becomes a 'you MUST respect that person but no one needs to respect how you feel and you don't get to choose' situation, it's going nowhere positive, is it?

If that bothers you, well...I don't care, actually. I suppose it'll just continue to bother you.

Try neurotypical on for size.

Neurotypical isn't a personal identity, and it is offensive to suggest that it is.

Women are not a subset of our own sex. We are the sex, so trying to claim it refers to a group of male people doesn't work for me.

If I were to adopt "cis" as a label on a chilly day in hell, it would be to distinguish myself as someone who doesn't identify as the opposite sex, from those women (adult human females) who identify as "trans men".

It does, doesn't it?

A conversation with you about it doesn't interest me. That's as simple as I can make this. I answered a question posed by an OP.

You obviously have no obligation to defend the concept of 'cis', but the lack of people who are prepared to do so continues to suggest that it is indefensible .

You're European because you were born in and/or live in Europe. It's not really the same.

A conversation with you about it doesn't interest me.

I imagine that's because you don't really have any answers and simply adopt an identity label because you think you should, without questioning anything much.

Not me nor any woman I know. Totally offensive.

I'm as much cis as I am European.

Are there any other medical conditions you describe yourself as not having, as a personal identity?