Staniland Question is so good. Can we think of others?

Barracker

Part 1: Should 'transwomen' be allowed to distinguish themselves from members of the male sex, or should they be forced to share space unwillingly?

Part 2: Should women be allowed to?

Barracker nails it, as always :)

Should a trans man be expected to have life endangering surgery in order to be able to present as "male?"

Some great questions on here, and good explanations of why some seem like they would "work" but get side-stepped.

It's come to something though that these quite are needed. I look forward to the day that sanity returns to public discourse.

Why do we segregate by sex in the first place?

A famous transwoman, who was on puberty blockers as a child, then cross sex hormones and then surgery, is on public record as saying they have never and will never experience orgasm. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

As someone who is trans..

If transwomen, who identify as/with women, feel unsafe in biological male spaces then why should women share spaces with biological males too?

@barracker I really like your part 1 & 2 (above).
It exposes the mysogeny so clearly

Part 1: Should 'transwomen' be allowed to distinguish themselves from members of the male sex, or should they be forced to share space unwillingly?

Part 2: Should women be allowed to?

If a prisoner identifies as a woman only some of the time (such as Pippa Bunce) would it be right to drive them between male and female prisons depending on how they felt that day?

also:
Should a woman be punished for not wanting to get undressed with a transwoman?

(There was a girl in the USA removed from a changing room at a school for objecting to changing with a male to f trans student).

"To be legally covered under the protected characteristic "gender reassignment" one must be, at the bare minimum, proposing to undergo a process to change one's "physiological or other attributes of sex".

What are the physiological attributes of sex, why are they important, and how can they be changed in a meaningful way?

And one that is just constantly dodged. As at that stage, transwomen do not want int the womens because they are scared of men, its because 'thats where the women go' or something a bit more like 'because thats where women go, women like me. You must accept me as a woman the exact same way that you accept that black women are women otherwise you are discriminating against women' (or other racist analogy here)

Pips Bunce identifies as a woman three days of the week, and as a man the rest of the time. Pips has won prizes for achievement as a senior woman in business.

If TWAW, is Pips literally a woman on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays?

If misgendering is a crime, what pronouns should we use for Pips on a Tuesday and a Thursday? Why would the same pronouns be acceptable on some days but literal violence on others?

In what essential way is Pips different on woman days from Pips on man days?

You have all asked most of them.

I would just like to know why,

When the choice was there to fight with our help for third spaces and extra provisions, why It was decided to completely demolish womens rights.

And why is anger always directed at women for saying no. And not those who got greedy, flew to close to the sun and ruined it for eveeyone.

It's sadly not a positive right for women to have female only spaces in many locations (although workplace toilets are supposed to be either single sex or closed cubicle).

But it is potentially creating a hostile environment of sexual harassment if women and girls have to share changing rooms etc with fetishistic cross dressers (under the trans umbrella as we all know). So in some circumstances providers of these facilities are risking a legal challenge by allowing these males in.

Another possible question:

Should the needs of male bodied people ,who identify as women , to be treated as if they were women, override the needs of women and girls to be safe in places where they are vulnerable?

It is specifically stated in law that this can override gender reassignment.

Only if it is a proportionate means of meeting a legitimate aim. Communal changing rooms might meet that test, although it would probably require a third space to be found. Changing rooms with cubicles and toilets would not. Iit's not up to the law anyway, it's up to whoever owns the premises. If a shop or service is happy to let trans people use toilets/changing rooms inline with their gender there is nothing to legally prevent that. And pretty much all of them do.

No legal right to say no to men.

Wrong but interesting to see it presented as a desirable outcome.

The right to single sex spaces is enshrined in law.

It is specifically stated in law that this can override gender reassignment.

Back to the original question.

Should everything be made mixed sex? If not, why not?

Yes, I expect TW will continue to tend to use the disabled changing or other mixed sex option instead of the men's.

Disabled changing spaces are for disabled people. Mixed sex options rarely exist. And in the vast majority of cases you do not have the right to say no, that's democracy I'm afraid, you don't get to ignore laws you don't like.

Yes it needs to end. Third spaces should be available for those people who don't wish to use facilities designated for their own sex. However, for the privacy of both sexes male and female separate facilities should be just that.

So long as women continue to have the right to say no to TW using the women's as an alternative then everyone's fine.