There's no longer any good reason for a woman to leave a man

"Requiring government ID and biometric identity verification will slash the number of amateurs willing to risk posting content online. Is it worth it to reduce the chance that some of them may be minors?"

It's an emphatic yes from me.

They are operating in plain sight. Twitter is a cesspool

You are right of course @MissBarbary

What I actually did was read the article then clicked to this linked article which I felt was written in the exact same style, tone and turn of phrase as the other one. I concluded the same chap had written them. The gender guesser is, of course, little more than a stab in the dark.

Anyway, I’ve just gone back and can see I was wrong. The second article was written by Gilian Tenbergen, a Sexual Abuse Prevention Expert and Sexology Scholar.

Make of that what you will.

I want to disinfect my phone after looking at that site- it's truly vile.

Did the article say the writer was female? I can't remember and I'm not going to read it again. It's largely irrelevant- the partner is complicit in normalising paedophilia.

urgh

If anyone gets taken in by this bunch I've got some prime real estate I'd like to sell them. Their agenda is plain, and it sure ain't child protection.

Oh, its that creepy "child protection" organisation that seems to spew out an awful lot of pro paedophile propaganda . They arent even trying to hide it. How the fuck have they not been shut down at this stage? Unbelievable

I notice that there is no good way to report pedophile accounts on twitter.

HeadPain x-posted, sorry!

I went to their Twitter to find the article.

Got a few Tweets down and came across this.

Requiring government ID and biometric identity verification will slash the number of amateurs willing to risk posting content online. Is it worth it to reduce the chance that some of them may be minors?

not envy they aren't trying hard to hide who they are, are they? You'd have to be very naive to fall for this "support group" bullshit, this is 100% about pushing the boundaries of what is socially acceptable, a little bit at a time. They're a new incarnation of PIE, and everything they post or write is aimed at greasing up the slippery slope.

And apparently this is all OK on twitter.

"Is protecting children really worth it, if it means we might get less porn?"

Their tweet:
"Requiring government ID and biometric identity verification will slash the number of amateurs willing to risk posting content online. Is it worth it to reduce the chance that some of them may be minors?"
mobile.twitter.com/ProstasiaInc/status/1357382416403492873

I read it. I'm not prepared to make excuses for her. She's an adult woman and she's trying to normalise this too. She has as much responsibility as him.

I agree. If your partner is literally telling you that they are attracted to other people, the problem isn't their gaslighting.

Can we call a space and shovel here? If your husband tells you he fancies having sex with children but would never do it, it is entirely laudable to leave his sorry paedo arse and make sure you warn all your friends and family that he is a pervert.

Jesus wept, this should be obvious.

In light of the recent killing of 2 FBI agents as they served an arrest warrant on a pedophile, it does not surprise me that pedophiles will go to extraordinary lengths of all kinds, including institutional capture wherever they can find it. I see no redemption with these types of criminals...

Also, I don’t believe it is written by a woman. Hardly scientific, but Gender Guesser seems to agree with me.

I wondered about that, too. I thought "surrendered wife" - it read like a Stepford wife, or someone with STockholm syndrome.

Astroturfing whether via anonymous articles like this or social media and comments sections are deliberately designed to give the impression that a particular demographic group supports something. In this case it's women, attempting to gaslight us into thinking it's a common mindset we should support as 'progressive'.

Vile

Finding an 'outlet' is actually reinforcing the urges. I'm so sick of all this sophistry.

Yes, that was one of the most disturbing aspects of that piece.

Another issue I had was the tacit assumption that everyone's darkest sexual fantasies require an outlet. No. It's not right to support paedophiles to find a way to feel like they are having sex with children 'without harming children' via role play, robots, dolls, whatever it may be, just as it isn't right to feed some men's rape fantasies. These things are not healthy and a responsible, compassionate society should work on helping people not to develop these urges in the first place, or to reduce them once developed, whilst protecting those around them, rather than finding a 'safe' outlet for them. Sadly, I can see a future where stating this view will be criticised as advocating conversion therapy.

That has actually turned my stomach.

Dear lord, why did I go on that website.

I would summarise that article as: Women! Stop doing things that might force men to rape children.

Also, I don’t believe it is written by a woman. Hardly scientific, but Gender Guesser seems to agree with me.

Hiding in plain sight.

I started to read the article linked to.

It's utterly unspeakably awful.

Using "MAP' - minor attracted person - instead of paedophile, because, the writer says, her partner will never act on his attraction.

I just can't imagine what it must be like to be in a romantic, sexual, and domestic relationship with a man who openly admits he prefers 11 year old girls. Yes, the writer tells us, unapologetically, her partner's preference is for 11-15 year old girls

She's being abused & gaslighted, and she doesn't realise it.