In The National today: "Joanna Cherry: Attempts to smear or intimidate those who want to debate policy won’t make us stronger":
www.thenational.scot/news/19066835.removal-snp-front-bench-smacks-double-standards/
It's obviously a personal account -- but still a more coherent, internally consistent, and believable explanation of events surrounding the "sacking" than anything I've seen so far from the SNP officially or via the usual anonymous SNP Westminster "insiders".
We unfortunately don't learn what "unacceptable behaviour" is (1) bad enough to be sacked from the SNP front bench but not suspended from the party AND (2) WORSE than (just for example) reading out confidential and sensitive letters from your constituents in a public video whilst making fun of their trauma and calling them derogatory names or launching a public campaign to smear and defund a gay rights group or announcing to the press that your leader promises to pass a piece of proposed legislation that's still out for public consultation. We're not alone in the dark though, because according to this article, no one has yet officially told Cherry what that behaviour was either.
Archived: archive.is/nvLSl