The Guardian - 'Non Transgender Girls', 'Female Transwomen' - transwomen are now the default

As one of the a Twitter replies mentioned - what about the mental wellbeing of trans men? Who may or may not have been at the top of their sporting game? But living their authentic life means not being able to compete (fairly) against biological men OR women. But no one gives a shit about their rights to sport? They presumably have accept that that life is over for them.

Well I’m certainly a Non-Guardian reader. They deserve to go under.

Of all the things they could celebrate from
The executive order. Fuckers

@MumUndone This is why I think that woke ideology (for the want of a better term) is a cult. One of its foremost commands is not to think. You must never question one of its tenets, just keep pushing the ideology. Never ever consider the consequences of what you're proposing, or who it might hurt.

Another lifelong Guardian reader here who cancelled her subscription last year. Those bastards will never see another penny from me after the way they've treated women.

That ratio is a thing of glory.

General public aren't actively GC, but they aren't buying the bullshit.

How is it that people think this is ok? Is it that people just don't care, that they're not personally affected? Or is there simply not enough awareness of the issue? I mean, come on. Just because some 'feels' like a female they can compete against biological females and that's ok? Really? And transwomen are so much more important that biological women that now biological women are to be known as 'non transwomen'?? Madness. Just, sigh.

I would like to know the source of that picture before accepting it as the original image

www.ctpost.com/sports/highschool/amp/Jeff-Jacobs-Courage-award-for-transgender-13765719.php

"But the two transgender runners at the center of that case said in court filings that being able to run against girls was central to their wellbeing."

This is a bizarre paragraph. In what way can it be considered central to their wellbeing? What about the girls' wellbeing? Why is it a good thing for someone's wellbeing to involve trampling over others?

"The two transgender runners at the center of that case said in court filings that being able to run against girls was central to their wellbeing."

And the 'wellbeing' of the girls who would prefer not to run against fit young males doesn't matter at all.

It's just breathtaking that people go along with this and don't think there's anything wrong with it. Only people who literally don't care about girls could possibly think this is OK.

I would like to know the source of that picture before accepting it as the original image.

I just can't get my head around it. Do female transwomen have a penis?

I think in the world where words have no meaning, they have a female penis.

*Did they ask the girls about their mental health? I don't suppose that was considered important

Don’t be silly, according to the G

• there are male girls designed to be sporting champions
• there are female girls who were once were designed to be sporting champions are just support beings.

Yes that photo shows two people with clearly male physiques beating people with clearly female physiques.

Did they ask the girls about their mental health? I don't suppose that was considered important

There are some people who post on these boards who think the feminists here overreact to the issues raised by trans ideology.

Out of curiosity, what do these posters think about the use of 'non-transgender girls' in a mainstream British newspaper? Is this development of language something (a) to be welcomed, (b) to be ignored or (c) to be fought?

If (a) or (b) I am interested in knowing your reasons.

Among the many comments, this one says a lot:
If all the benefits of a policy and none of the harms accrue to the male sex, while all of the harms and none of the benefits accrue to the female sex, it's almost certainly a sexist policy.

I've just been looking at that piece. I wondered if the picture editor was rather subtly taking a position against the thrust of the piece - the choice of using an image that has 1st and 2nd place going to the trans athletes, and the caption, "transgender athlete Terry Miller, second from left, wins the final of the 55-meter dash over transgender athlete Andraya Yearwood, far left", rather emphasises what those campaigning for single-sex sports find unfair.

The Guardian might have suppressed comments on their site, but it's been well and truly 'ratioed' on Twitter.

twitter.com/guardian_sport/status/1352618665603198976?s=19

115 likes
384 quote tweets
Nearly 1600 replies, almost all negative.

How to turn your readers into implacable enemies.
I will never give the Guardian a penny ever again. And I will celebrate the day they go bust.

I know, I know but as per various pieces on the bbc - email and complain to them

This is unbelievable! 😧 Jesus the lengths they will go to to twist language into meaningless gibberish.