Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

BBC - female sex offenders report

112 replies

UppityPuppity · 19/01/2021 09:27

Please help me understand my disquiet about this BBC report about female sex offenders. The reflections in the report of abuse inflicted by the mother on the daughter is heartbreaking. A cruel betrayal of trust.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55338745

The piece underlines the need to have accurate stats and language of sex of perpetrators/victims in the criminal justice system and crime reporting.

It also underlines to me how far the BBC has fallen in my estimation with their determined inability to provide clear reporting of the perpetrators male sex in so many other sexual offences contexts.

Instead of immediately thinking that this is an issue that needs to be raised - AND IT DOES these victims deserve support and justice - the BBC is so contaminated in my estimation, that my first thought was the BBC are yet again trying to push the narrative that merges male and femaleness as they do in so many other contexts. This reaction is unfair to the victims of female sex abusers who have my sympathy.

Is it their blatant hypocrisy? They are rightly clear on the sex of perpetrators in this article but not in so many contexts where they state blatant untruths and ignore the male sex of perpetrators. The BBC let down victims of female sex abusers and their distinct experiences, harms and needs, because they fail to report incidence of male sex abusers accurately.

Stats in report-

In 2018-19, 3.8% of all child sexual abusers were female, based on police reports, Office of National Statistics data shows

How do we know the sex - we don’t. As far as I can see - this is increased from previous stats - ONS figures show in 2015 only 1.34% of prisoners sentenced for child sexual abuse as the first main offence were women. The BBCs stats double this.

Is the increase due to different metrics being measured/ die to a greater understanding of the crime/greater reporting of the crime or more male sex offenders identifying as women?

The BBC obfuscation of facts are part of the problem - they have lost their credibility and actively let down victims like this in the report.

OP posts:
NiceGerbil · 20/01/2021 01:45

Not read the whole thread sorry

Thoughts are, and disjointed.

Yes women can and do sexually abuse. The nuns in the Magdalene laundries and other similar institutions did so. The difference seems to me that they weren't doing it for personal sexual gratification (?) but as torture.

Most women convicted of sex offences have acted as a second to a man.

MRA have long been saying women are as bad as men but don't get reported.

Stats on gender rather than sex make a mess of the stats. See a couple years ago shock headlines women sex offences up xxx%. Rape up massively. You can be female and convicted as accomplice but it's rare. Safe to say the numbers included trans women ( rape in UK law requires a penis).

So.

If there is an under-reported amount of sex abuse committed by women. Then we need to know. It's your mum. Who reports their mum? Also the cases with teen boys and female teachers. This stuff happens. It may well be under reported, as male on male abuse is.

I don't know.

Certainly my life experience tells me that men do this. But sexual abuse by women is I think not sexually motivated, but sadistic.

Who knows. And the point is we will never know if we don't know the sex of the perpetrator or the victim. I mean that's fucking obvious.

The police forces have been recording self declared gender for years without any records as to when or why.

If people care about sex offences, under reporting, children etc. Then accurate records are key.

That's not what's wanted. So.

Well they are arseholes tbh. Who wants to muddy the stats on child sexual abuse?

HecatesCats · 20/01/2021 01:43

@GodOfPhwoar

Is there anything that people won't turn into a trans debate? 😂
Well things that specifically relate to male and female perpetrators should absolutely be scrutinised and data collected in order to inform how we tackle these crimes in future. Do you disagree?
GodOfPhwoar · 20/01/2021 01:43

I do of course understand the issue, but it does seem to me that some people use it as a diversionary tactic - makes women look bad so 'must've actually been a man pretending to be a woman.

GodOfPhwoar · 20/01/2021 01:40

Is there anything that people won't turn into a trans debate? 😂

Melroses · 20/01/2021 01:14

And no they haven't asked about anything to do with what they mean by the word "woman", so it could be different for each of the 36 replies they had. The question above is all they broadcast.

HecatesCats · 20/01/2021 01:14

They reference 382 rapes carried out by women, but rape cannot be carried out by women. They give no explanation or background detail for this. They do not explain if those figures include male born perpetrators. They do not say if they've asked the forces if they're recording this according to self ID. Women cannot be convicted of rape in the uk because it involves penetration with a penis (by law). They can be convicted under joint enterprise and there are two cases in the UK that I can find between 2001 and now. So what's going on here and why aren't the journalists answering these questions for us in their journalism?

Melroses · 20/01/2021 01:01

That part is from 07.20

HecatesCats · 20/01/2021 00:57

Melroses forgive me, but the excerpt I've listened to there is extremely serious, but it doesn't refer to rape, it also says that it could be due to better reporting but doesn't suggest they've even asked about whether sex = gender identity for some forces?

Melroses · 20/01/2021 00:49

www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000rcq5 at 04.48

"How many reports of sexual offences were by women"

HecatesCats · 20/01/2021 00:43

Did they ask if they had recorded sex? (Rather than self id'd gender)

Melroses · 20/01/2021 00:40

The figures in the BBC programme came from Freedom of Information Request returned from 36 forces in England and Wales.

Thelnebriati · 20/01/2021 00:25

People are talking about different sources of statistics; the ONS collates data from a number of sources including victim surveys. It does not only report data provided by prosecutions.

The legal definition of rape is penetration with a penis.

HecatesCats · 20/01/2021 00:20

There's definitely a news story here that is worthy of a programme as well respected as File on Four, but it's not that women are committing more rape.

PlantMam · 20/01/2021 00:09

Would be mad if we’d gone from 2 ‘joint enterprise accessory to rape convictions in 2 decades’ to ‘400 women rapists’ without anyone noticing.
Especially as all 400 women would be convicted alongside their male accomplices - rapist couples are usually big news, so I’m pretty sure we’d have spotted 400 of them.

HecatesCats · 20/01/2021 00:08

jj "rape" cannot be committed by women. Do you care about the truth?

jj1968 · 20/01/2021 00:07

@HecatesCats

Three women produced the BBC Radio Four File on Four report. Not one of them thought to check the legal definition of rape? Is that right? How else could they have attributed nearly 400 rapes to women?
In the ONS data the BBC report is based on the category rape includes assault by penetration, that's what these figures refer to. As the link I posted clearly shows. Does anyone care about the actual truth, or is the chance to lie that this is all down to trans women too good to give up.
HecatesCats · 19/01/2021 23:52

Three women produced the BBC Radio Four File on Four report. Not one of them thought to check the legal definition of rape? Is that right? How else could they have attributed nearly 400 rapes to women?

aliasundercover · 19/01/2021 23:44

Fucking hell jj, just write "I hate all women" and have done with it.

HecatesCats · 19/01/2021 23:42

Women can be convicted of rape under joint enterprise laws. Additionally often when 'rape'' figures are quoted it often refers to 'rape or equivalent offence'

I can find copy on only two cases in the last two decades in which a woman has been convicted under joint enterprise. Perhaps you could furnish us with further statistics jj if you expect us to believe that this in anyway proves that women are as dangerous in this respect as men (not even close)? Rape is committed by a person with a penis. Only males have penises. We know the truth because of lived experience as well as statistics.

What is hard to stomach is that women have been warning about this for years and now we see it happening and blithely carried out by the BBC ffs, like some kind of sick joke.

PlantMam · 19/01/2021 23:18

Female people can ONLY be convicted of rape as an accessory under joint enterprise principles, so again...

it seems extremely unlikely that when a victim reports the crime of rape they would missex the person who penetrated them with they penis.

The victim may well describe the rapist as being assisted/encouraged by a female accomplice. but actually going into a police station or a rape crisis centre and reporting an unnamed person for the crime of ‘rape by accessory under joint enterprise principles’?

Well, that is something that truly never happens...

unless the victim maybe works for CPS? 🙄

jj1968 · 19/01/2021 23:01

You can view the data here: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/childsexualabuseappendixtables

The category Rape refers to rape or assault by penetration.

BBC - female sex offenders report
jj1968 · 19/01/2021 22:54

@CaraDuneRedux

Do I see some straw clutching going on here?

Joint enterprise is incredibly rare, and in this instance no co-defendants are mentioned.

Yes, and the attackers were reported by the victims to be women,
CaraDuneRedux · 19/01/2021 22:49

Do I see some straw clutching going on here?

Joint enterprise is incredibly rare, and in this instance no co-defendants are mentioned.

persistentwoman · 19/01/2021 22:40

Good point PlantMam
This rapist was referred to as female throughout their trial for rape - presumably the victim was coerced to refer to them as she judging by this report:
www.cambstimes.co.uk/news/crime/transgender-rapist-jailed-6910204

jj1968 · 19/01/2021 22:34

@PlantMam

In many cases there may not yet be a suspect to self-declare a gender and they will be recorded according to however the victim identifies them.

A person who has been RAPED (non -consensual penetration by a PENIS) is extremely unlikely to missex their attacker.

Indeed, so it's unlikely they would be recorded as women in these reports.

Women can be convicted of rape under joint enterprise laws. Additionally often when 'rape'' figures are quoted it often refers to 'rape or equivalent offence' such as assault by penetration.

Swipe left for the next trending thread