Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Thread removed- girl crowdfunding to get Stonewall OUT of the CPS

104 replies

UppityPuppity · 05/01/2021 17:53

Gardeners - the previous thread was deleted because I linked a tweet from Safe Schools Alliance.

There is a hearing on 12th Jan to try & secure a judicial review of the CPS’s membership of Stonewall’s champions programme. Please support the crowd justice fundraising.

Please google SSA/crowd justice. You know what to do.

Remember to remove the CJ donation - and if you can afford it, add it instead to your donation. Google what Crowd Justice did to Allison Bailey if you want to know why.

OP posts:
Angryresister · 13/01/2021 00:52

Does anyone know how she is doing?

RobinMoiraWhite · 12/01/2021 23:35

@ItsAllGoingToBeFine

Further, we are disgusted at the CPS’s attempt today to depart from normal practice and seek punitive damages against a 15 year old girl

Shock Fuckers Angry

No such thing as punitive damages in U.K. courts. That’s a US concept.
HecatesCats · 12/01/2021 23:12

Loins well and truly girded

MerchedCymru · 12/01/2021 22:40

Massed loin-girding going on here too Bunting. Onward and upward!

BuntingEllacott · 12/01/2021 22:37

I mean, I could suggest that such an action indicated a certain amount of vindictive anti-female animus quite consistent with a government body that had been thoroughly immersed in the anti-female policies of a certain lobby group, and therefore an appearance of bias, but I'm assured such an idea is baseless, so I'll trot along and contribute quietly to Ann Sinnott's crowdfunder and gird my loins for the next battle to protect women and girls, because We Will Not Be Intimidated Into Compliance.

MichelleofzeResistance · 12/01/2021 21:55

Unbelievable. Shock

What an interesting PR choice that was.

HecatesCats · 12/01/2021 21:53

Further, we are disgusted at the CPS’s attempt today to depart from normal practice and seek punitive damages against a 15 year old girl

Wtaf?!

2fallsagain · 12/01/2021 20:11

@Ereshkigalangcleg

Good point 2falls, it's about capture. Like the typo Grin
Oops. Must wear my glasses to post!
Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/01/2021 20:00

Good point 2falls, it's about capture. Like the typo Grin

2fallsagain · 12/01/2021 19:58

It's really frustrating that the judge failed to see the bugger picture. That even if it were just a case of employee "rights", those employees will be making decisions on cases and representing women in court.

WarOnWomen · 12/01/2021 19:41

I am really shocked by that. Truly disgusting

yourhairiswinterfire · 12/01/2021 19:38

@ItsAllGoingToBeFine

Further, we are disgusted at the CPS’s attempt today to depart from normal practice and seek punitive damages against a 15 year old girl

Shock Fuckers Angry

And the reasoning: We believe this is intended to have a silencing attempt on others seeking to oppose Stonewall’s anti-women and anti-safeguarding ideology.

Arseholes. Want women to just give up and submit. They can fuck off with that shit.

Molesmokes · 12/01/2021 19:35

A warning shot over the bows rather than a direct hit. Let’s hope the CPS changes tack, other captured vessels take note and all chuck Stonewall pirates and stowaways overboard ⚓️

2fallsagain · 12/01/2021 19:34

@ItsAllGoingToBeFine

Further, we are disgusted at the CPS’s attempt today to depart from normal practice and seek punitive damages against a 15 year old girl

Shock Fuckers Angry

Yes quite. Showing bully boy tactics there. We are all absolutely appalled.
Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/01/2021 19:31

Seriously? Angry

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 12/01/2021 19:30

Further, we are disgusted at the CPS’s attempt today to depart from normal practice and seek punitive damages against a 15 year old girl

Shock Fuckers Angry

2fallsagain · 12/01/2021 19:25

Thank you so much to everyone who has dug deep. The support is incredible.

2fallsagain · 12/01/2021 19:22

Safe schools have put out a statement here:

safeschoolsallianceuk.net/2021/01/12/cps-hate-crime-schools-guidance-permanently-withdrawn-judicial-review/

Please read and share. Twitter here:

twitter.com/SafeSchools_UK/status/1349070573721235468?s=20

MerchedCymru · 12/01/2021 17:36

This is massively disappointing given that the bias is so obvious. CPS were acting in the specific interests of Stonewall's legislative agenda.

But well done all those involved for shining some light on this travesty and forcing organisations to think twice before they give up any pretence at independence or even-handedness. Here's to you Wine.

Let's hope that Harry Miller's case succeeds. Step by step...

highame · 12/01/2021 16:26

will keep an eye out. Don't think it will be long

crossparsley · 12/01/2021 16:25

Ah, sorry I typed too fast. Should have said ‘we are probably going to have to review in my earlier post.

crossparsley · 12/01/2021 16:19

Sorry highame, I was going on the reported judge’s comments in tweets from safe schools UK. I’m not directly involved - just directly affected as an employee of a public sector Stonewall champion.

MichelleofzeResistance · 12/01/2021 16:17

CPS also need to take a look at SafeSchools alliance where supporters of Stonewall are making very clear that recognising and caring about the equal interests of female humans, or expecting British law to be impartial and uninfluenced by politics is 'throwing LGBT+ rights backwards'

Draw your own conclusions.

BuntingEllacott · 12/01/2021 16:13

It reminds me of the tactic of testing boundaries repeatedly to find a weak spot. New guidance issued, to test the water, withdrawn, and then the process begun elsewhere. Never allowed to be challenged in a precedent making way, so the bad faith actors remain free to continue again, while the big narrative of inclusion is pushed to shift wider opinion. Classic propaganda, really. Quite sickening when it's the rights of women and girls being toyed with.

Whatwouldscullydo · 12/01/2021 16:13

So does this mean that any school that implements what they were trained in via this guidence now has no legal back up of it causes problems and a student seeks legal advice?

So schools will now foot the bill as they weren't following legal guidance?

Swipe left for the next trending thread