What I find so weird is these "philosophical researchers" can't even be bothered to research or read what Kathleen Stock actually says.
They just fabricate their hot takes based on some out of context screenshots that US PhD students have misrepresented because they don't understand UK laws and have zero cultural awareness of the fact that in the UK, trans people have the same rights as everyone else in law.
Do they think the general public can't see through their lies and misrepresentations?
As Professor Stock tweeted, they completely misrepresented her stance on the GRA in the letter:
"I've just read bit where they say I'm "well known" for my opposition to GRA - except that I am actually against repeal of the GRA, and am definitely pro retention of protection of gender reassignment under Equality Act. But details, right?"
twitter.com/Docstockk/status/1346505244243603457?s=20
"If you are going to slander me to colleagues
@jIchikawa and @lastpositivist
can you not even get the basic details about my view right? (You won't see this obviously, because you blocked me months ago as potentially harmful to your presumably delicate eyeballs)."
twitter.com/Docstockk/status/1346505868813234177?s=20
It's just really depressing to see people in trusted positions completely lacking in basic integrity. At least so far it's mostly foreign academics signing (who patently don't have a clue what's going on here) and a handful of blokes from UK universities - mainly Scotland.