Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Women & Equalities Commitee live today at 2.30

238 replies

ArabellaScott · 09/12/2020 14:08

'The Women & Equalities Committee will hear from witnesses tomorrow 9/12 on Reform of The GRA at 2.30 pm. Witnesses include @Docstockk
@ProfAliceS
@GoonerProf
& Prof. Stephen Whittle, Alex Sharpe.'

(from Allison Bailey's twitter feed)

www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/dfc9f53e-2ac4-4c30-8712-e3df47938fd7

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
OvaHere · 10/02/2021 17:08

New evidence session took place this afternoon. I'm sure many MNetters will find it enlightening.

parliamentlive.tv/event/index/fb12feef-6d41-457a-a102-ea59813bb583

Witness(es): Karon Monaghan QC, Barrister, Matrix Chambers; Robin White, Barrister, Old Square Chambers; Naomi Cunningham, Barrister, Outer Temple Chambers; Sally Brett, Head of Diversity and Inclusion, The Law Society

Shedbuilder · 14/12/2020 23:31

Thanks, Hecate's Cats. I'll write a letter of complaint to the Conservatives citing lack of objectivity and reminding them that they are required to be objective and make decisions impartially, fairly and based on merit. Copy to Liz Truss. The bias was so blindingly obvious that it brings into question the committee's ability to do its job properly. Any GC member of the committee would have taken note of what they could expect if they stuck their head over the parapet.

TinyTroubleMaker · 14/12/2020 23:30

Thanks Hecates

HecatesCatsInXmasHats · 14/12/2020 22:10

The committee have an email address [email protected], I think the main port of call to complain about MPs is the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, but I don't think they would be in breach of the code of conduct. Could be wrong - TLDR. You can contact the House of Commons enquiry service to find out if there are any other avenues www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/offices/commons/house-of-commons-enquiries-service/contact-us/

It might be worth listing the Conservative MPs as they were all pretty biased, recording what they had to say and contacting CCHQ, the committee members are putting themselves somewhat at odds with the minister Liz Truss. You might also argue that a lack of objectivity puts them in breach of the Conservative code of conduct:

www.conservatives.com/code-of-conduct

Contact details here: www.conservatives.com/contact

GreenUp · 14/12/2020 21:52

Does anyone know where we can send a complaint to? I'm not in the constituencies of any of those MPs.

I thought there was a clear bias in the way they treated members of the two panels and it seems only right that they should be held to account for this.

HecatesCatsInXmasHats · 14/12/2020 21:50

That couldn't possibly have been a deliberate attempt to undermine them, could it?

ArabellaScott · 14/12/2020 21:45

Fooking hell, Fleegle.

OP posts:
TheFleegleHasLanded · 14/12/2020 21:38

twitter.com/cforwomenuk/status/1338501336476897283?s=21

Women & Equalities Commitee live today at 2.30
Women & Equalities Commitee live today at 2.30
Women & Equalities Commitee live today at 2.30
picklemewalnuts · 14/12/2020 21:29

Excellent @PlantMam , thank you.

HecatesCatsInXmasHats · 14/12/2020 21:25

@persistentwoman

Wouldn't it be wonderful if a journalist exposed the bias and pomposity revealed by the behaviour of these sadly inadequate MPs?
It would be nice if such obvious partiality was held to account, reassure us that the fourth estate were doing their job properly.
Deltoids1 · 14/12/2020 20:44

Prof Whittle’s submission has been published above the Stonewall one. It’s rather long and at one point tells us about his carpal tunnel problems Hmm

It’s the only one added today, or at least it was when I looked this afternoon.

SadlyMissTaken · 14/12/2020 20:41

I am so proud of these women. What perfect replies

persistentwoman · 14/12/2020 20:19

Wouldn't it be wonderful if a journalist exposed the bias and pomposity revealed by the behaviour of these sadly inadequate MPs?

PlantMam · 14/12/2020 20:14

@picklemewalnuts

Can the extract answering the q about TWAW be shown here, please? I'm keen to see that!
Peter Gibson Thank you for clarifying that no advantage was given to them. Could you each confirm for me your view as to whether a trans woman is a woman and whether a trans man is a man, please?

Professor Freedman
I will go down the law route because that is my expertise, and I think you would rather have my expertise than my personal opinion. In law, it says that a man is someone who is born male with biology in terms of chromosomes, gonads and genitalia, and a woman is someone who is born female with the same biological factors. Now, there is the legal fiction where a trans woman or a trans man may gain a gender recognition certificate that changes their legal sex but does not change their actual sex. Currently, in law, a trans woman is a trans woman unless she holds a GRC, in which case she is male, she is a trans woman, but, legally, she would be recognised as a woman for many but not all purposes.
That sounds complicated because the law is currently in a bit of a mess and that is why we need to change and streamline it. My opinion, therefore, changes depending on whether someone holds a GRC, but I stick in line with what the law currently says, which is that your sex is determined by biology.

Dr Stock
I think that we have two sexes, males and females. We have the human versions, the human males and females, and we have the adult and younger versions, adult and younger human males and females. We need a category to describe the adult human male and the adult human female because it aids communication about a vast range of things, given that we are a sexually dimorphic species that reproduces via heterosexuality. In other words, woman is adult human female and man is adult human male. That is the best understanding of those categories.

Professor Sullivan
I have been very clear. There is a distinction between sex and gender identity. Both of them are quite properly protected characteristics and we need to see them as distinct. The slogan “trans women are women” has been really unhelpful. Grown-up, mature adults do not talk in slogans. We need to think about the fact that there might be contexts where we want to treat trans women as though they were women and trans men as though they were men. In other contexts, that may not be appropriate. For example, if we think about sporting categories, changing rooms or data collection, all sorts of different issues may come up and we need to have a sensible conversation about those different contexts.

—————————-

Copy and paste from the downloadable PDF available here: committees.parliament.uk/event/2998/formal-meeting-oral-evidence-session/

picklemewalnuts · 14/12/2020 19:58

Can the extract answering the q about TWAW be shown here, please? I'm keen to see that!

ArabellaScott · 14/12/2020 19:39

From the transcript:

'Kate Osborne: What steps do you think the Government should have
taken to mitigate the harm that is clearly being caused as a result of
opening this consultation?

Professor Sullivan: Can I just question the premise of that? We live in a democracy, and debate and consultation are not harmful. We hear a lot of hyperbolic language about this, calling debate literal violence and so on. Conversation is really important in a democracy. We need
conversation. It is not harmful.

In terms of what the Government could do, we need politicians across the political spectrum to stand up for women’s civil liberties. For example, when a woman MP like Rosie Duffield is monstered simply for suggesting we should be able to use the word “woman” rather than “cervix-haver”, I think most people would find that absurd. There is still time for parliamentarians to speak out and to try to help create a more normal environment in which women would feel less at risk in speaking up.'

I am so impressed with how these three witnesses handled some really dire questions. Chapeaux!

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 14/12/2020 19:36

Thanks, Hecate./ And for the transcripts.

I thought the bias was outrageous.

OP posts:
Mumofgirlswholiketoplaywithmud · 14/12/2020 19:15

[quote HecatesCatsInXmasHats]From FPFW:

If the latest inquiry into Gender Recognition Act (GRA) reform by the Women and Equalities Select Committee (WESC)C)_ is to be productive and worthwhile, it needs to be conducted in a genuine spirit of inquiry and neutrality. Our analysis of the questions asked in the first two hours of oral evidence suggests there is still work to do.^

fairplayforwomen.com/wesc-gra-inquiry/[/quote]
Thank you for this! Interesting Hmm

committees.parliament.uk/event/2998/formal-meeting-oral-evidence-session/

The transcripts are up.

Women & Equalities Commitee live today at 2.30
HecatesCatsInXmasHats · 14/12/2020 18:42

From FPFW:

If the latest inquiry into Gender Recognition Act (GRA) reform by the Women and Equalities Select Committee (WESC)C)_ is to be productive and worthwhile, it needs to be conducted in a genuine spirit of inquiry and neutrality. Our analysis of the questions asked in the first two hours of oral evidence suggests there is still work to do.^

fairplayforwomen.com/wesc-gra-inquiry/

TinyTroubleMaker · 14/12/2020 10:18

Thanks

Shedbuilder · 14/12/2020 10:18

Rosa, Kathleen and Alice were fantastic. The last few questions from the Committee suggested they had their fingers in their ears though 🙄

I was discussing this with a friend over the weekend and she has reason to suspect that Stonewall or its proxies encouraged some of the MPs to ask those leading and provocative questions because they could see how rational and reasonable the Professors were looking. My friend suspects that's why the 'Do you believe TWAW?' question was asked and why one of the MPs made such a fool of herself over the statistics. Those were attempts to unsettle the Profs because they were so good.

Whittle et al were kicking themselves because they'd managed between them to state that a) gender identity is innate and unchangeable and b) gender identity is fluid and so it's unfair to require anyone to have to sign a declaration committing them for life. They did enormous damage to their credibility with that one.

TheFleegleHasLanded · 14/12/2020 09:15

A transcript usually follows, but no sign of it as yet.

TinyTroubleMaker · 14/12/2020 07:00

Will Parliament provide a transcript of the answers does anyone know?

Mumofgirlswholiketoplaywithmud · 13/12/2020 08:48

Just finished watching it. They were fantastic! Their answers to the "are tw women" question is something that I would want on a poster. They were so eloquent- well done!

(Though feeling a bit gutted that the MP asking prof Freedman to repeatedly explain her statements about male's risks to females seemed to be being deliberately belligerent)

ArabellaScott · 10/12/2020 14:28

Thanks, Abitofalark.

OP posts: