Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

GRA reform

40 replies

Angryresister · 07/12/2020 17:54

In committee 9/12 apparently. Just looking at the witness statements published, there are many fewer than I would have expected from GC women. I suspect some may not be published by request. Has anyone noticed that their submission is not there? But thank you to those that have been published. I almost choked on some of the others, especially the one wingeing about having to pay for clothes and cosmetic surgery as well as for a certificate...

OP posts:
Angryresister · 07/12/2020 20:54

Another FOI there are some now put up on 1st Dec. But only about 20 more.

OP posts:
Campervan69 · 07/12/2020 20:33

I'd recommend you email the following:

[email protected];
Liz Truss [email protected] [email protected] Emma Nicholson cc: [email protected]; [email protected];

Maybe ask some questions. Where is your submission? What number of submissions were judged to be sufficient? Were submissions rejected because of content? If so, on what basis? Why were such parameters not included in the public information about this call for evidence?

Seems like there is something amiss with this call for evidence.

anotherFOIrequester · 07/12/2020 19:40

Mine's not there. None published since Nov 25th which is very slack if they're in committee in 2 days!

Imnobody4 · 07/12/2020 19:23

I think they're supposed to notify you when they publish. I assume they read them all first and I suspect GC one's would be more detailed so am putting it down to amount received and workload at the moment.

Angryresister · 07/12/2020 18:52

Mine was in quite early but I said I wanted to be anonymous and they could publish. I noticed one from a member of the public had their name at the bottom.

OP posts:
Angryresister · 07/12/2020 18:50

Is anything being said on Twitter about this? Sorry, don’t use it ...

OP posts:
OhHolyJesus · 07/12/2020 18:49

I think they must be swamped to be honest. Mine is there, I know of others that aren't. I'm guessing that many are confidential rather than just anon so I'm not worried. Also those that were from templates or didn't meet the criteria would have been rejected.

Angryresister · 07/12/2020 18:48

So what readers will see is not representative of our views. That’s very significant.

OP posts:
testing987654321 · 07/12/2020 18:17

Mine not up yet. It's odd how long it's taking them.

334bu · 07/12/2020 18:15

Mine is not there ; submitted Wednesday evening.

nauticant · 07/12/2020 18:14

Mine isn't there either. It was a last minute submission.

JamieLeeCurtains · 07/12/2020 18:12

It should be possible to ask?

From the webpage committees.parliament.uk/work/658/reform-of-the-gender-recognition-act/

"Email: [email protected]
Phone: (General enquiries) 020 7219 5113 / (Media enquiries) 020 7219 1708
Address: Committee Office, House of Commons, Palace of Westminster, SW1A 0AA"

spongedog · 07/12/2020 18:12

Mine isnt there - I uploaded on Friday 27th Nov. There hasnt been an update to the list of contributors in days. I dont know if they are required for Wed 9th Dec. I did notice there was a 1 hr time difference between time I uploaded and the time stamp from the acknowledgement.

What I am pleased about is that a lot of my submission included many of the points raised by the judges in KB's recent judgment. So I shall not be happy if my contribution is ignored or devalued as happened with the Corporation of London consultation.

HecatesCatsInXmasHats · 07/12/2020 18:08

I don't think they've published all the submissions

FeedTheSparrows · 07/12/2020 18:05

I co-wrote a submission and it has not yet been published.

I recall seeing it is up to the committee what gets published, but as you say there seems to be fewer GC ones than I would have expected inc. can't see any from well known GC women or groups.

Perhaps they received a lot on the last day and there is a backlog to upload? Although my cynical side doesn't believe that...