Quick rant time.
Work are celebrating LGBTQ history month. Fair enough. Post on discussion board about a transwoman of some historical interest - think Jan Morris era or thereabouts - not Jan, but will pretend it is, as don't want actual outing details on here.
Nice, insightful article - sort of thing that is well worth knowing about and discussing, glad the person in question posted it.
But resident TRA has immediately pitched in with "don't deadname her" because the article uses the birthname in connection with early achievements. Achievements which this person would not have been allowed to undertake had they been a woman. (Think Times sending Jan rather than James Morris to cover the Everest Expedition - it just wouldn't have happened).
To ban deadnaming, in this instance (as is so often the case), is to falsify women's history. It gets right up my nose. And there are so many examples of this. The Dick-y-pedia entry for the "Warchowski Sisters" held up as the first women to direct a big sci-fi blockbuster trilogy - except they did it as the Warchowski brothers, and anyone who thinks a major studio would have green-lit a project like the Matrix if a couple of women had pitched it has shit for brains and is living in fantasy land. Or Caitlin Jenner winning gold in the Olympic decathlon - an event which women are not eligible to enter.
I repeat: banning deadnaming falsifies women's history.
(Which I guess is the point - all part of the ongoing erasure of women and any admission ever that sex might be the basis on which we're discriminated against...)
Gah.
Rant over.