I do think there is something systematic about it that is designed to prevent our sex from achieving a certain uninterrupted flow in our daily lives. I love being in public, walking, going around on my bike, having random conversations, observing what's around me, and I wonder whether these sorts of intimidating interactions are meant to put us in our place and to remind us that we can never be in charge
Sorry, this is starting to sound a bit tin-foily - is it maybe just a feature of human nature that some people are out to dominate and intimidate others, and men are using inappropriate sexualised behaviour to put women in their place because they know it works?
Excellent point.
I agree that it’s systemic. It’s not about women - our age, appearance, clothes, hairstyle. It’s about men and their attitudes and values.
I agree they think that the public domaine is theirs and that we are only there because they allow us to be - if we look and act in a certain way that is pleasing to them. Hence all all “ smile / cheer up love “ comments. Our faces have to be arranged in a certain way that they approve of, otherwise we shouldn’t be out in public.
Hence the harassment experienced by women out running - we don’t have the right to be sweaty or wear non sexy running gear - we need always to be attractive to men, always putting them and their wishes first in our lives. That’s why so few women go out running alone - they are fed up of the harassment.
But it’s not just in public - This thread is about women in their own homes. They still have to be focussed on random men’s needs for affirmation and always remember their primary role in life as eye candy.
Do you thing that men relaxing at home in old clothes / painting the ceiling worry about answering the door to a delivery driver in case he makes comments about their appearance or what’s in their parcel ? I’m pretty sure they don’t.
BTW I am speaking about men as a class , not your Nigel, I’m sure he’s lovely.