Gay men's magazine bullied into grovelling

We had this art and drama teacher who was really down with da kidz who used to ask us to design tattoos. It was embarrassing.

If everyone just ignored Colin Robinson, he would not feel so special and might go away. You won't change his mind.

No one cares about your preferences mate.
Thats the point. Please stop telling us about it.

So its okay for people to attack me based on what they assume my preferences are but if I correct them I'm doing something wrong. Okay that seems very reasonable. Rolls eyes.

Copy and pasting what you, yourself, have said, isn't an attack. If you don't want people to repeat what you say, don't say it.

Talking about men in general, isn't talking about you.

I have absolutely no hint of what your sexuality or preference is. I couldn't care less.

Oh wait....ive made that sound like a bad thing 🤔

People are expecting a lot from pshe to be fair

Its got to cover relationships, drugs, alcohol, general health stuff, radicalisation, abuse etc as well as sex education which includes porn, sexual health and others that I can’t remember

If you went down the ‘lets cover EVERYTHING sex wise’ theyd have no time for maths

Hey, jj why don't you have a chat with the lads at datalounge about how evil the GC movement is?

They might not notice your persistent assumption that female homosexuals want to mimick PIV. Don't start on this one though.

www.datalounge.com/thread/27439073-quoting-posts-for-a-linguistic-study-female-pronouns-

Since when are you 'men in general'? There is definitely something centric going on.

jj1968 I think the point is that there was no need for you to mention your penis or sexual preferences on a thread about RSE education in schools.

Aside possibly to demonstrate why it needs to be created within a safeguarding framework appropriate for children.

Or they might seek out the information on the packaging that the toy comes in if, at any point when they're an adult, they choose to use one.

And you did conflate the two jj1968. You posted a link to a study about adult lesbians using vibrators to support your point about why children need information about using strap ons in RSE.

Girls are taught about female bodily hygiene from when they're two years old. I can't imagine why you think caring adults would wait until their daughters are in secondary school to teach them this.

I mentioned I wasn't into penetrative sex twice @Datun, both times in response to you, once for accusing me of being phallocentric and not being able to understand any kind of sex without a penis and once because you implied my support for inclusive RSE education was because I wanted to have anal sex with women.

I am so sick of men dictating my sexuality. Maybe I should move to clitheroe and embrace lesbian separatism - I hear males have a problem finding it on a map....

To paraphrase twitter, "yes you did, dude".

I have said over and over and over again that you need to stop going on about lesbians and strap ons. Most recently I said I don't want young lesbians hearing they should be using strap ons in school.

You: but here's a link about vibrators!

Either you were conflating strap ons and vibrators, or you just randomly posted a link for no reason. If you weren't conflating them, that link was as relevant to my post as a link on the usage of blue pigment in Renaissance Italian art.

And please don't try the old chestnut about if we don't tell children all about , they might end up doing it wrong.

Seriously. How many times do you think we've heard that on here??

Neither am I the one advocating educating children about strap ons and anal sex. Or being worried about giving young people too much information, in case it means they don't want to do it.

And that's what, the third or fourth time you've mentioned your penis and whether or not you want to penetrate somebody else with it? Give it a rest.

Also, people highlighting what you, yourself, are saying isn't a 'personal attack'.

Read my post as to what is ‘untrue’

Then followed up with

What about that statement is untrue?

All I've ever supported is factual safety information being given to young people on common non heterosexual/procreative sexual practices.

Not quite.

You downplayed the risk of one type of sex that is not something few females find pleasurable, let alone a teenage girl with;

Those things are exceedingly rare and all human sexual activity carries a degree of risk of both injury and disease’

Then followed up with

If the message given out to young people is that anal sex is highly dangerous, no woman would ever want to do it and its likely to cause all manner of injuries, but it's okay for the gays then that is likely to make young gay men feel stigmatised and also its just not true.?

So many 🚩 🚩here.