@NotBadConsidering
As well as the lack of acknowledgment in articles like this of the incontrovertible harm caused by the pathway, it’s always worth noting that threads about this sort of article never seem to attract our friendly contributing TRAs to tell us how good it is. And there’s never any screenshots of these sorts of threads posted on Twitter about how horrible we all are not wanting kids to have such life-destroying treatments.
It’s almost as if there’s no justification...
In my experience of this board, the contributing TRAs and their allies would like to keep the focus solely on toilets. There seems to be little wish to engage in other, perhaps more difficult topics.
On the topic at hand, the idea that a 'neo' vagina can be considered any way 'fully functional' is abhorrent. In addition to what everyone else has already said, real vaginas do not need daily dilation and are not subject to the truly awful side effects that some 'neo vaginas' are (eg colon leakage into the 'neo vagina').
I watched a video of Blaire White interviewing Emily. Emily comes across as a perfectly nice person, as does Blaire. However, I did find it uncomfortable to watch two male-bodied people essentially discussing what it is like to 'be' a woman.