Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

non-men

36 replies

peppermintteadrinker · 21/11/2020 08:24

I'm a regular reader in here but don't usually post in FC. But just read a tweet by someone involved in my industry to do with diversity in which he refers to non-men. So sick of this shit.

I run a work based account and therefore I can't challenge or unfollow. In principle I want to support this group this man represents to do with racial diversity in the industry but fgs. Non men is just offensive.

Why have we ended up in this minefield that means supporting one under represented group means by default we have to tie it to other groups and all that bloody mess?

I am perfectly happy to support anyone in a minority and firmly believe we should all be treated with respect and dignity but not like this. Why should saying the word woman be so hard and now a political statement?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
LockdownLump · 21/11/2020 16:29

Reminds me of Joey off friends when advertising for a room-mate 'non-smoking, non-ugly'

How the audience laughed at such a misuse of language.

peppermintteadrinker · 21/11/2020 16:23

Yes @highame I think so too but I feel angry at being in a position where simply saying he's got it wrong would put me at risk professionally. Ironically the women's industry organisation that allies with his is so woke (and I don't really like that label either) that I really felt at the conference it didn't speak for me much.

@Tyro like the sentiment. That's true..though when you say we are dead named you mean..they don't use woman? I only understand deadnaming as using a trans person's old name of the other gender. Or do you mean that your feminism includes TW and that issue? I'm open minded and sympathetic to trans people. What I'm not sympathetic to is being told what to say or think and having women's real issues erased and labelled as bigotry. For a world obsessed with non-binary identities, we have gone extremely binary in our thinking.

OP posts:
highame · 21/11/2020 15:23

Whereas feminists spring forth whenever we're mentioned and when we clock our euphemisms and deadnames. 😂 love that, will now go and dig out my cape.

tbh I think your man is trying to be 'cool woke' and thinking things through may not be a strong suit at the moment

TyroTerf · 21/11/2020 13:58

Women. Women. Women. You can say our name. We're not fucking Voldemort

We're far more powerful - Voldy only appeared when people said his preferred name. He couldn't detect people saying Tom Riddle or You-Know-Who.

Whereas feminists spring forth whenever we're mentioned and when we clock our euphemisms and deadnames.

Very wise woman, that JKR.

MissMarplesGlove · 21/11/2020 13:29

Why have we ended up in this minefield that means supporting one under represented group means by default we have to tie it to other groups and all that bloody mess?

Because, sadly. we live in a culture in which women are not regarded as fully human.

When I say this, people look at me as though I'm some crazed feminazi. But just look at the evidence - "non-men" !!!

DrDavidBanner · 21/11/2020 13:19

@Coffeeoverload I don't think its supposed to make sense.

In the Relationships threads I see a lot of mainly women talking about how their spouse discombobulates them by constantly changing their wishes and demands.
Its all a ploy to keep the victim on their toes and not knowing what is coming next and this is exactly what is playing out here with the constantly changing language and what is and is not acceptable.

Wandawomble · 21/11/2020 12:46

[quote peppermintteadrinker]@CaraDuneRedux "Women. Women. Women. You can say our name. We're not fucking Voldemort"

GrinGrin[/quote]
This!

Aesopfable · 21/11/2020 11:50

peppermint yes 'non-white non-woman' is offensive.

peppermintteadrinker · 21/11/2020 11:30

Exactly coffee!

OP posts:
Coffeeoverload · 21/11/2020 11:00

Surely he would be offended if he were referred to as non-white? Can he really not see the insult here? Or is he just tying himself up in knots to not exclude the non-men non-women? Such is the mad world we now live in...
I also don’t understand the double standard of the languaging (new word) these days. If TWAW why is the word woman controversial?
The world has turned into some crazy Alice in wonderland Cheshire Cat riddle 🤯

peppermintteadrinker · 21/11/2020 10:47

Sorry I meant your rhetorically..not at you @Aesopfable!

OP posts:
peppermintteadrinker · 21/11/2020 10:47

@Aesopfable

He is a male person of colour.

Surely yoi mean he is a non-white non-woman?

Well no I don't mean that because I don't like this labelling other people business. I'm happy to refer to people as they prefer but don't give me your labels. I'm not cis nor am I a non man.
OP posts:
Aesopfable · 21/11/2020 10:06

He is a male person of colour.

Surely yoi mean he is a non-white non-woman?

ErrolTheDragon · 21/11/2020 10:03

He said that in looking at issues that affect men in society it also highlighted how those issues contribute to ” inequalities that affect non-men”.

I wonder if you could agree with him but invert the language - something like, 'yes, it's unfortunately true that the inequalities which affect women are contributed to by those affecting non-women'.
And then give a hopefully uncontroversial example eg differential expectations re parenting negatively affecting both dads who want to be more engaged parents but also mums who are assumed to be the default main carer.

TyroTerf · 21/11/2020 09:55

Can we counter by divvying up the entire universe into feminists and non-feminists?

ThatIsNotMyUsername · 21/11/2020 09:49

Yes. The universe now comprises 2 things and 2 things only:

Men
Everything else

Pahrump · 21/11/2020 09:47

So we are now describing things by what they aren't now, except male/man trumps everything?

peppermintteadrinker · 21/11/2020 09:37

He is a male person of colour.

I think he has good intentions but he's tied himself in knots. He was referring to international men's day and how it was good to see it becoming a more positive conversation. He said that in looking at issues that affect men in society it also highlighted how those issues contribute to ” inequalities that affect non-men”.

If I rephrased it to say non-women and women would that be ok?🤨

OP posts:
StanfordPines · 21/11/2020 09:29

@peppermintteadrinker

He represents a group that aims to support people of colour in the sector.
Is he a person of colour or non man himself?
peppermintteadrinker · 21/11/2020 09:27

@CaraDuneRedux "Women. Women. Women. You can say our name. We're not fucking Voldemort"

GrinGrin

OP posts:
peppermintteadrinker · 21/11/2020 09:25

He represents a group that aims to support people of colour in the sector.

OP posts:
TyroTerf · 21/11/2020 09:25

Non men = all not male humans over the age of 16 then?

It's worse than that, it's everything in this universe that isn't a sufficiently manly adult human male.

My cat is a non-man. The pile of sick my cat just left in the yard is a non-man. Asteroids and turnips and ducking-stools - all of these things are non-men.

Sometimes I wonder if they realise that for years, men have been trying to tell us that we're not allowed to be annoyed to be referred to under the umbrella term 'man' because it explicitly covers both males and females of the adult human variety.

Man meaning male and also man meaning human, apparently.

And now the new generation of patriarchal twonks are telling us "no, no, of course we don't conflate man and human any more, that would be dreadful. No, we've separated it out, all sorted now, you're a non-man and don't you dare complain about it."

How on earth is that any better?

ThatIsNotMyUsername · 21/11/2020 09:10

I think it includes wombats too. And cats.

CaraDuneRedux · 21/11/2020 09:09

@Aesopfable

Does his group refer to non-whites too?
That's what I was going to ask.

Play him at his own game. Say he's reinforcing the idea that "men" are the norm and everyone else is an amorphous undifferentiated group of "others."

FFS, it's just so offensive.

Women. Women. Women. You can say our name. We're not fucking Voldemort.

wonderstuff · 21/11/2020 09:04

Green party do this. They've currently got someone running for a 'non-men' post who is a male who identifies as non-binary. I feel the women are erased when we have people who identify as men and people who don't instead of sex based categories. I'm hoping this trend will eventually go as more people not involved in fringe politics realise how daft it is.

Swipe left for the next trending thread