So the campaign page states:
"The memorial will be a tangible way to share Wollstonecraft’s vision and ideas. Her presence in a physical form will be an inspiration to local young people in Islington, Haringey and Hackney. And it will send a powerful message beyond that, across the world. Just as the image of Churchill’s memorial statue is used in debates on his legacy, the same is needed for Mary Wollstonecraft."
www.maryonthegreen.org/project.shtml
The statue we got doesn't really fulfil this. It's entirely not based on her likeness but an imagined version. Who is going to be inspired by yet another abstract naked woman?
The BBC article someone linked earlier mentions:
"Writer Tracy King tweeted: "There is no reason to depict Mary naked unless you are trying to be edgy to provoke debate.
"Statues of named men get to be clothed because the focus is on their work and achievements.
"Meanwhile, women walking or jogging through parks experience high rates of sexual harassment because our bodies are considered public property.""
www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-54886813
It's not enough just poorly thought out, it's harmful.