The Future of Legal Gender - Should state law withdraw from registering and assigning sex?

Don't get it.

Do they think that babies who were born in the past before registration had no sex/ no one knew what it was?

What about tracking if sex selective abortion is happening? Or conditions that are sex specific?

Do doctors have to pretend they don't know the sex of anyone under 18 or whatever, how does that work then?

In schools in summer how will teachers I'd those at risk of fgm?

I mean there's loads of stuff.

What is gained? Especially when everyone knows what sex the sodding baby is anyway, the vast vast majority of the time.

But state law doesn’t assign sex. You’re just born with a sex, it isn’t assigned to you.

I think it’s a good idea to take sex off of drivers licenses to help passing trans people not be outed when they buy a drink. I can’t think of any good reason for sex to be on a picture ID but maybe I’m missing something. In any case, changing (falsifying) a birth certificate shouldn’t be allowed. In addition someone’s sex shouldn’t be required for quite as many documents. I’m not sure about passports.

Beyond that I think it’s still a good idea to keep record of (bio) sex because there are some times when it’s important to verify it. For example which prison people should go to, what sports they are eligible for, etc.

Keeping track of whether people are male or female, and whether they are gay or trans is important for some health and equality related circumstances as well - but that can be done via privately asking people in those contexts, and via census and related survey.

These people are absolutely twonks.

Here they are whining about the responses they got to their poorly constructed, confusing survey

futureoflegalgender.kcl.ac.uk/2019/09/20/engendering-criticism-reflection-on-feedback-to-our-attitudes-to-gender-survey/

These people have approx 750k public money to carry out this ridiculous "project".

A couple of years ago another poster said that they thought this was one of the end goals of this whole movement. Remove legal demarcations of male/female and you can oppress 50% of your population again on grounds of their sex as much as you like but it's not legally visible anymore.

Ban us from referring to our class identifier 'woman' and we can't talk about our oppression as members of that class anymore.

It's literally George Orwell's Newspeak, in which words to describe things and concepts are outlawed one by one by the Party so nobody can talk about their oppression. It is actually happening in front of our eyes! It seems unbelievable but it's actual totalitarian (and very male) control emerging twistily from a supposed democracy like a cobra from a basket.

Let's all sign up and show this nonsense up for what it is.

Having just read some of that blurb on the links...

ffs. Go and conceive of whatever you want and explore your navels to your heart's content. Just stop dismantling everyone else's world to better fit your very special visions. Fuck off with that. And with your 'false dichotomies'.

You are pissing on my leg, it is not raining.

I suspect this will be their next move ...

It's just bollocks.
We all fucking know that males will continue to use, abuse and oppress females even if they pretend there is no such thing as sex. We just won't allowed to point out that it's the ones with the penises doing it.
Because we ALL know sex exists.

Some of those sound like parody, only I know they’re not.
Anyway, it’s a ridiculous idea, and would only work in a country with a very small state apparatus, and no socialised medicine, so any gender reassignment would have to be paid for by the individual concerned.
I’m sure there’ll be lots of wokesters nodding along to the idea, but I’ll be surprised if the inevitable negative repercussions will be considered at all. For instance, if there’s no gender in law, then anyone is free to discriminate against anyone else on those grounds with no repercussions?