What they haven't told us yet is whether any of the females subjected to digital penetration at gunpoint were young.
My DDs 11 and 13 I'm assuming would have been assaulted in this way if we were on the flight. I don't see any reason they wouldn't be. They both started their periods ages ago and have breasts etc.
Of course for other women there's a chance that they hadn't been penetrated before, especially the younger ones.
No one seems to be considering that or asking that question in the news.
The guardian article is interesting in that the male lawyer consulted keeps banging on about them being able to get cash compensation while the female one focuses more on whether they can do anything around human rights laws etc
The assumption that these women will want a bit of dosh to shut up and won't give two fucks about anyone else this might be done to, from the male lawyer, is interesting but not surprising.
When women are raped for eg lots of men say oh she's after money (how you get money for being raped is never explained).