Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Leeds Libraries Drag Story Hour (again)

79 replies

HDDD · 19/10/2020 17:43

"Exciting news – we are working with
@DragStoryHourUK
to bring you a FABULOUS family friendly storytime.
More details to follow. "
twitter.com/leedslibraries/status/1317815999660425219
I had a vague recollection of them planning one before, and a quick search tells me it was cancelled, due to pressure. Not sure what pressure, or how, and why they are now planning another.
I know they are contentious and I can't square the circle of why promoting difference and acceptance can only be done by drag queens. Also who pays for them?

OP posts:
FairFridaythe13th · 25/10/2020 08:41

And panto is on stage - kids know it’s all make believe and fantasy. Now they are being told it’s up close and real.

Clareflairmare · 25/10/2020 08:39

@JellySlice

How about a female firefighter or a male nurse read stories to children? Or a visually impaired person? Or a person with a prosthetic? Or a person who uses a wheelchair? Or a bilingual person who could deliver the story in two languages?

What does an adult entertainer whose entire shtick is based on stereotype-driven sexual innuendo have to do with demonstrating diversity to children? How is stereotype-driven sexual innuendo in any way family-friendly?

This. I’m not a prude. I also recognise that British classic panto is basically men in drag. So don’t want to get too extreme but it’s not the diversity I want or need for my children in libraries. Have women in hijabs, have men who are foster carers, have people from different ethnicities. But to single out something that is definitely sexual in concept is misguided.
IwishNothingButTheBestForYou2 · 25/10/2020 08:36

I agree too. I think it's ludicrous that in the twenty first century you can still take the piss out of women this way but woe betide anyone who fucking "misgenders" someone.

It's like we've all dropped some shit acid.

IAmNotAGirl · 24/10/2020 10:37

@NiceGerbil

I don't like panto either. Grew up in the 70s/80s and men dressing up as women for laughs was everywhere. I always felt uncomfy with it even when I was a kid.

I just can't get on board with men dressing up as caricatures of women whatever it's called.

Agreed
NiceGerbil · 24/10/2020 02:44

I don't like panto either. Grew up in the 70s/80s and men dressing up as women for laughs was everywhere. I always felt uncomfy with it even when I was a kid.

I just can't get on board with men dressing up as caricatures of women whatever it's called.

dumpling23 · 23/10/2020 19:41

I really don't see the harm.
I'd happily take my child to one of these, no different to panto dressing up really.
Are we supposed to get our knickers in a twist about the ugly sisters as well now?

Hi Ktp100. Panto and drag both involve men dressing as women, but that doesn't mean they are the same thing. Drag is conceived as adult entertainment, and - unlike panto - relies heavily on sexual innuendo and erotic suggestion. Unlike panto, it's sexualised entertainment aimed at adults. That's why some of us are raising questions. Why introduce pre-pubescent children to age-inappropriate sexual content? And what is the motivation of adult performers seeking to insert themselves into a space for children as opposed to the sexually-aware adult audience they usually perform for?

NRatched · 23/10/2020 19:37

These have been on Aida H Dee’s adult site which is restricted to over 14 year olds

Adult site, for 14 year olds. Thats quite concerning in itself to me tbh. 14 is not an adult.

FairFridaythe13th · 23/10/2020 16:27

Id like to see what form that took.

Is - it - safe...?
Yes yes YEEESSSSSS

ArabellaScott · 23/10/2020 16:16

a full risk assessment has been undertaken

Is this available to see?

IAmNotAGirl · 23/10/2020 16:12

@Angryresister

Has a FOI been done for the complaints received. In those emails there was both the implication that there would be negative comments, but also that none had been received, which is untrue.
It doesn't look like another FOI has been done.
Angryresister · 23/10/2020 15:59

Has a FOI been done for the complaints received. In those emails there was both the implication that there would be negative comments, but also that none had been received, which is untrue.

FairFridaythe13th · 23/10/2020 15:50

A background check is absolutely appropriate in this instance - assuming they don’t have a DRB (would they even need if interacting online?).

Social media is just that - social. Don’t want it ‘out there?’ don’t put it ‘out there’.

Fajitanita · 23/10/2020 15:48

it is not appropriate for the council to check a person’s social media accounts or ask them questions about their private life, as to do so might well be a disproportionate interference with the person’s right to private and family life under the Human Rights Act.

Wtf

IAmNotAGirl · 23/10/2020 15:44

As that posted it occurred to me to wonder what the rules on buying services are in the public sector? At what point does it have to go out to tender? Is that expenditure based or type of service?

I don't work in the public sector so I don't know.

IAmNotAGirl · 23/10/2020 15:41

Interesting deletion my post at the top of page 2 was answering someone who was querying what the library and performer got out of the arrangement and commenting that there seemed to be an £80 fee involved when initially it was free and that the email in the FOI showed how persistent they were.

I don't recall anything untoward about their post but because it was deleted my post was also deleted.

Are we not allowed to identify that the person promoting DQST is clearly running this to make money?

That they are using sales techniques to hook libraries in offering a free performance which is actually pre recorded and can then be used by multiple libraries. That once they have some libraries in agreement it is easier to promote to others by saying these other libraries have signed up.

Is there any reason why we can't discuss this? It's just recognising that DQST isn't altruistic for LGBT people it's a business opportunity. They are selling a service using a freebie as a hook.

Angryresister · 23/10/2020 14:54

growinggreyer. She is in customer relations and directorate improver manager. Interesting to see that she has consulted with the legal dept among others. Leeds has been totally taken over by training from Stonewall it appears. Funny how when WPUK were cancelled discrimination against a protected group was not considered despite this being such a big part of their line. As far as I know drag queens are not a protected characteristic...

FairFridaythe13th · 23/10/2020 12:48

I know female firefighters who go into schools to engage with for us and young women - not only to join the service but to demonstrate how women can follow their own dreams. The do it as a service they set up themselves, and not a business.

Surely they are an example of brilliant women role models to get in to read stories to little kids - some are mums, some aren’t, and they do engage with kids all the time (lots of station drop ins). Plus they have cool kit.

growinggreyer · 23/10/2020 12:45

So a massive failure in safeguarding is now being used as a defence?

Incidentally, who wrote this letter, Angryresister? They seem to put a lot of weight on their own judgement. I would be interested to know what level they are within the council and what safeguarding qualifications they hold.

RoyalCorgi · 23/10/2020 12:42

We've said this before, but there are two questions you can ask Leeds to put to the drag queen: 1. Would you be prepared to read stories to children in your ordinary clothing, not drag? 2. Would you be prepared to read stories to the residents of old people's homes?

Angryresister · 23/10/2020 12:40

apparently used the love has no age slogan
but were challenged.

FairFridaythe13th · 23/10/2020 12:13

What was Asda doing?

Angryresister · 23/10/2020 12:02

why did Asda remove their strapline i wonder ? !

FairFridaythe13th · 23/10/2020 10:32

Because under 14 year olds would never ever try to access anything it age appropriate?

RoyalCorgi · 23/10/2020 09:56

These have been on Aida H Dee’s adult site which is restricted to over 14 year olds

Oh, that's OK then.

What on earth is wrong with these people?

Chrysanthemum5 · 23/10/2020 09:51

Are they seriously using the term 'minors attracted people' rather than paedophille? Is that part of Leeds diversity now?

Swipe left for the next trending thread