*TW* Pedophile found guilty of raping 5 year old given a SUSPENDED SENTENCE

Who is the judge in this case? Anyone know?

I also missed this thread and am sitting here in shock that it could have gone through like this. Well done to everyone who pushed for a review. That poor, poor child.

Anyone wanting to do something could do worse than to set up a small monthly donation to the Centre For Women's Justice. They're the last line of resistance for women's rights in law, and they do incredible work on almost no money. A fiver a month adds up to sixty quid a year, and if everyone who could, gave a sum they could afford to lose, they'd be infinitely better able to defend us all.

Just signed up to a monthly donation, well worth a fiver a month.

Absolutely shocking. Even if severe learning disabilities he should be on sex offender list for life, and the public protected from him. A secure facility, a 'carer' with him at all times forever especially if he goes out anywhere any time in his life.

There is a link to a very long excel spreadsheet and he is ‘CH’ towards the bottom!

Poor girl, but glad the sentence is to be reviewed.

I too missed the original thread and am horrified to read the original sentence, what an absolute travesty. Glad to read the update about the sentencing review, fingers crossed for a positive outcome.

I missed this thread at the time. I’m absolutely aghast.

Well done on all who organised for sentence review.

Maybe we could empty some of the women’s prisons of non-licence fee payers and turn whole buildings over to the male estate, make a bit more space for pedos and rapists?

brilliant news mumof4terrors - thanks for the update - good to know that we can have some effect on that level of injustice.

Thanks for the update mumof4terrors

According to an article the other day, 2/3 of women in prison are there because they didn't pay thier TV license. How the fuck is it right that there are people serving custodial sentences for failure to pay a bill, yet this shithole gets away with a slap on the wrist!?

[quote Mumof4terrors]For all those of you following this thread - good news! The attorney general has referred this case for sentence review - so all you people who were thinking that there might be mitigating factors (which I still cannot understand) - hopefully Callum Haycock will be thrown in prison and the key thrown away.... (with a bit of luck the judge will get booted out too).

www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/outcome-of-unduly-lenient-sentence-referrals[/quote]
Thank you for the update Mumof4terrors, lots of groups put complaints in and I know a lot of us on this thread did too. I can't find him/the case on the spreadsheet within the link though 😬

For all those of you following this thread - good news! The attorney general has referred this case for sentence review - so all you people who were thinking that there might be mitigating factors (which I still cannot understand) - hopefully Callum Haycock will be thrown in prison and the key thrown away.... (with a bit of luck the judge will get booted out too).

www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/outcome-of-unduly-lenient-sentence-referrals

I’m withholding judgement on wether this is appropriate sentence or not. If his behaviour was a direct result of poor support or poor care plan and he was known not to have capacity, then the system is at fault and professionals should be held accountable

@tinabr you’ve left your name in there!!

I have sent this email today:-
FAO The Rt Hon Suella Braverman QC

I am writing to request that you review the sentence handed down to Callum Haycock at Worcester Crown Court on 1st October, for the rape of a 5 year old child. He was sentenced to just 3 years community service, with 5 years on the Sexual Offenders Register. There was no custodial sentence.

This sentencing level is grossly inadequate for an adult convicted of extreme sexual violence towards a very young child. It does not begin to reflect the seriousness of the offence, it cannot serve as any deterrent to others, and it does not even adequately provide for proper levels of oversight and monitoring in the years ahead. I therefore believe that this sentence is unduly lenient. I ask that this case be referred to the Court of Appeal.

I would further request that a full investigation take place into the Judge's ability to hold such a highly respected and powerful position. The very fact that he/she believed that this was an appropriate sentence to hand down for a crime as heinous as this one is to say the least highly questionable. The justice system has failed this little girl and her family, an appalling travesty of justice, it is therefore of utmost importance that this be reviewed and corrected as a matter of urgency.

I look forward to hearing from you shortly.

Kindest regards.

* Edited by MNHQ to remove name* **

I was saying clearly that the sentence was shocking and also wondering what - if any - legal mitigation could there possibly be for such a lenient sentence. And if there is any legal mitigation then the law is an ass
I’m not sure how that could possibly make me a rape apologist nor how anyone could have said I was trying to justify the sentence given

I can’t remember either but remember I did think ‘that’s going to go pufffffft’. Sorry, no help. Email MNHQ and ask.

I can't remember what your comment was.

I reported the opening post and suggested the "tw" should be removed. It's completely unnecessary given what appears in the rest of the title and a bit crass given what TW usually stands for but MNHQ seem happy with it.

Why was that comment deleted?!

Ta - my autocorrect has a mind of its own

Yes I read the case and realised it was a different ‘ta’ meaning but was trying to think what it was. That makes sense .

Completely unnecessary

What was the tw ref though?

Presumably "trigger warning" ? Completely necessary given the rest of the thread title and tbh a bit crass given what TW usually stands for on here.