What I find totally baffling
Is that if you take a step back, like a good step back
And think. The UK and Ireland and other countries altered the law/ guidelines
So that men who said they were women would be housed in the female prison estate as a default
And this was changed quietly and some years ago in the UK and has been in place for some years
And in Ireland is codified in law
And no one knew.
Essentially, the authorities just went ahead and did it.
And then started placing male prisoners including sex offenders in with the women.
I mean that's completely bonkers. Anyone can see that's completely bonkers.
But it happened. The government and whatever other authorities said yep. Green light. Sounds good. Get it into the guidelines.
And no one knew.
How the fuck did this happen? What were they thinking? I know institutional capture etc but... Actual real people with actual real power said, yep. Put violent male sex offenders in women's prisons if that's what they want.
Same with loads of other stuff which if you take a step back is just obviously bonkers.
If so many people in authority are just green lighting shit like this, then our institutions are simply not fit for purpose. At all.
If you get any average person in the street or in the pub and say. Should males be put in women's prisons. Answer is no. Obviously. Before you even get onto sex offenders etc.
But this has actually happened in law in UK, Ireland, Canada etc.
It's incredible.
Someone posted the handwritten equalities risk assessment thingy from when they decided to put males in women's prison there. The part about protected characteristic of sex had n/a written next to it.
I say to DH. All this shows how little when matter. He looks uncomfortable. He sees how it is but can't get to grips with it. Nor can I TBH. All these lawmakers, institutions, etc. Just saying yeah ok.
It's hard to think about, TBH. But it's incredibly eye opening and extremely depressing.