Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

In GENERAL terms, all forms of surrogacy, altruistic included, is problematic

218 replies

NotBadConsidering · 23/09/2020 12:31

And requires a woman - adult human female.

MNHQ have made it clear both here and on Twitter that this can be discussed in general terms, with no names being mentioned, even when a person with thousands of followers tweets about it in the public domain.

So please, adhere to the rules and discuss generally why it is an issue. Personally, regardless of the sexuality of the intended parents, even the most altruistic surrogacy arrangement - as in UK law, providing it doesn’t change - is drought with problems. Someone always gives up rights regardless. It’s inevitable. Either the intended parents do during pregnancy, and the mother and child certainly do regardless.

We have strict laws that mean a soon to be born child cannot be removed from a mother unless there are serious concerns for that baby’s welfare, yet in surrogacy, that is always the intention. This is not changed regardless of it being an altruistic arrangement. Nor is the risk to the mother.

And it requires a firm grasp on biological reality to make this happen. Two gametes are required, from one of each of the two sexes. The female sex - which exists despite recent attempts to deny its existence - does all the work and takes the greatest risk in surrogacy, even the most altruistic arrangements. It is therefore baffling how anyone could deny the existence of biological sex knowing this.

So, keeping it general, and not discussing names, please add your thoughts and experiences.

And Flowers in advance to those who have previously gone to the effort to discuss their experiences only to see them disappear.

OP posts:
rorosemary · 24/09/2020 00:41

@littlbrowndog

But how can you dissociate yourself fromthe child you are growing in your body.

The kicks the hiccups

The wanting to protect that baby growing in your body

The thinking every week well now my baby has toes or can do this

Must take such a toll to cut yourself off from these feelings

Not everyone feels that way about pregnancy though. I certainly don't. I don't feel bonded while I am pregnant. It feels very surreal to me, like I'm lying if I say I'm pregnant. I forget to look up what my baby is doing/growing now. I forget sometimes how many weeks I am. Very much wanted ivf pregnancy, so it's not that. My friend who offered to be a surrogate also felt distanced during her own pregnancies while she is a very loving mother. I doubt that we are the only women who feel that way.
FannyCann · 24/09/2020 00:09

merrymouse

www.organdonation.nhs.uk/get-involved/news/500-people-have-now-donated-a-kidney-to-a-stranger/

I've answered my own question.

I regularly have dealings with people with kidney problems at my work. Not dialysis. Surgical type interventions. People needing a kidney removed for primary cancer for instance. Or an intervention to help protect their remaining kidney when one is damaged.

Whilst I would donate a kidney to my children or other family members in a heartbeat, I'd never donate to a stranger just for the sake of it.
Two kidneys means you have a spare. Just in case. Things happen. I've known someone get stabbed in one kidney.

I really wouldn't recommend doing it. The exception being an occasion when the NHS works out a complicated chain, where someone who isn't a match for their own family member but who is a match for another person on the transplant list whose relative happens to be a match for someone else and it ends up being a full circle - the NHS really can work wonders, I have known someone be in a chain of four. Brilliant.

NotBadConsidering · 24/09/2020 00:00

but which ensured we were all aligned in our thinking before we started treatment.

I missed this. What if things change? I seem to remember a surrogate doing an “ask me anything” on here and one of the very first questions was “what if the intended parents die in a car crash before the birth?” and it hadn’t been considered.

What if everything is arranged beforehand and one of the intended parents dies unexpectedly? Or both do? Or they divorce? Or get cold feet? Or lose their job? Or decide that actually, although they decided before they’d pay for costs they now feel like the surrogate is taking the piss and want to renege on the deal?

There’s too much reliance on goodwill seeing it through.

OP posts:
witchesaremysisters · 23/09/2020 23:47

Thank you so much for your openness, taking on the questions and those fascinating, comprehensive answers.

I was and remain very curious.

We had a surrogacy agreement. You cannot have a surrogacy contract in UK law. It was hugely helpful and comprehensive and independently facilitated by an experienced surrogate. It covered everything from antenatal tests, termination, announcing the birth, expenses, finding out the gender, planning the funeral.... a level of planning I never went into with my own pregnancies, but which ensured we were all aligned in our thinking before we started treatment.

Planning the funeral?

Dying?

That sounds darker than me asking who you gave your baby to. That may seem a an offensive way of putting it, and it is not my intent to cause deliberate upset. However, I do want to be blunt. The plain-speaking business of surrogacy is people who want kids making agreements with women they intend to impregnate so those mothers will give up the resulting child at birth. Will this baby you gave to your friends know that you're its birth mother?

What did your agreement mean, in real terms? What would have happened if you didn't meet any of your points? What would have happened if your friends no longer wanted to meet part of their points?

MinecraftMother · 23/09/2020 23:44

I'm a solicitor, am an equity partner in my own firm with a very successful husband who earns three times what I do. I have one dog, two degrees and three children.

I've been an altruistic surrogate, twice.

I know this doesn't make a "flurry" of "rich, successful women" but I'm certainly not the only one out there.

Antibles · 23/09/2020 23:35

fail to see how it would have been exploitation in this case.

No it doesn't sound like it would have been but a law has to cover every single case in the nation and has to be able to deal with everything: all the motivations women might have, all the potential outcomes. The fact that there are unproblematic cases still leaves the problematic ones.

NotBadConsidering · 23/09/2020 23:32

@Anon992

You’re basically assuming that because you and your intended parents successfully completed a pregnancy, had an arrangement that didn’t need to be challenged in court, and no one suffered any medical consequences then it’s feasible for every other arrangement to be as successful.

No I’m not.

I answered a series of questions asked of me.

I haven’t made any comment about other arrangements or frameworks. And it’s late now so I won’t start posting about that tonight.

I didn’t ask you any questions but you responded to my general pondering with the expression that you managed to cover all eventualities in your arrangement so I naturally assumed you think it can be applied across the board. Apologies if you don’t think that. But then I’d ask you to think, if not post, about how likely is it that your scenario can be successfully replicated with every other arrangement.

As I said, it’s basically “hit and hope”. If everything goes swimmingly, it’s seen as a life-affirming miracle. But no one can adequately explain how to protect all parties. Something has to give. In all scenarios.

And inevitably it the women - adult human females to those who aren’t sure Hmm - who would bear the brunt.

OP posts:
littlbrowndog · 23/09/2020 23:25

But how can you dissociate yourself fromthe child you are growing in your body.

The kicks the hiccups

The wanting to protect that baby growing in your body

The thinking every week well now my baby has toes or can do this

Must take such a toll to cut yourself off from these feelings

Anon992 · 23/09/2020 23:21

You’re basically assuming that because you and your intended parents successfully completed a pregnancy, had an arrangement that didn’t need to be challenged in court, and no one suffered any medical consequences then it’s feasible for every other arrangement to be as successful.

No I’m not.

I answered a series of questions asked of me.

I haven’t made any comment about other arrangements or frameworks. And it’s late now so I won’t start posting about that tonight.

SebastianTheCrab · 23/09/2020 23:20

[quote Anon992]@NotBadConsidering We discussed ALL of your scenarios and many more when we developed our surrogacy agreement. I also took out life insurance (paid for by my IPs).

No pregnancy is risk free. Life is not risk free. We all take risks all the time - when we cross the road, get behind the wheel of the car.[/quote]

How much comfort would the life insurance have been to your children if you'd died in childbirth?

Again. I post this link.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/20/us/surrogate-mom-dies-trnd/index.html

San Diego. 2020.

I'm also curious how you'll react if/when the baby you birthed comes to you with questions in a decade or two.

Or even, if they're aware from a young age of their unusual birth circumstances, how you'd feel if they turned up at your door at 11pm on a Monday night age 16 because they'd had a fight with their parents and want to come stay with you.

NotBadConsidering · 23/09/2020 23:14

Anon992

You’re basically assuming that because you and your intended parents successfully completed a pregnancy, had an arrangement that didn’t need to be challenged in court, and no one suffered any medical consequences then it’s feasible for every other arrangement to be as successful.

But the protections need to cover everything and everyone. The flaky, the variable, the dishonest, the unscrupulous, the penny-pinching, the cruel, the exploitative, the scenarios that end up in court challenging the legality of such arrangements, the insurance companies who don’t like paying out and so on. Show me THAT framework, not the one that worked, through luck, for you.

OP posts:
user1471448556 · 23/09/2020 23:11

When looking at the idea as a general principle, it doesn’t seem right, however there are cases where a woman has a medical condition that means pregnancy and child birth is life threading, e.g. cystic fibrosis, heart and lung issues, etc. These women are relatively well thanks to medication and if they were men and all that were required of them would be to ejaculate, they could become parents. Instead they are potentially denied this because they have a health condition PLUS they are biologically female. In these circumstances I think surrogacy could be valid.

NotBadConsidering · 23/09/2020 23:09

[quote Anon992]@NotBadConsidering We discussed ALL of your scenarios and many more when we developed our surrogacy agreement. I also took out life insurance (paid for by my IPs).

No pregnancy is risk free. Life is not risk free. We all take risks all the time - when we cross the road, get behind the wheel of the car.[/quote]
Yes, a framework needs to exist that protects all surrogates in all scenarios with all types of intended parents. What if the intended parents had refused to pay the premium for your life insurance? What framework do you propose to prevent that from happening with others? Should a life insurance policy for the surrogate be mandatory?

If so, then the costs escalate. How then can altruistic surrogacy be for anyone other than those that can afford it?

OP posts:
FannyCann · 23/09/2020 23:07

A Cafcass report noted the following:

"A clear example of the constraints on the court in determining whether the HFEA s54 criteria are met is the level of payments made to the surrogate as part of the arrangement. The data showed that this was often high and that payments are either accepted as reasonable expenses or authorised retrospectively by the court in order to secure the best outcome for the child. The retrospective authorisation by the court of commercial payments for surrogacy highlights the dilemma faced by the court that by acting in the interests of individual children born through surrogacy arrangements, they may be undermining the regulations prohibiting commercial surrogacy which serve to uphold children’s rights in general, preventing children being acquired for payment. It should also be noted that the high costs associated with
surrogacy mean that surrogacy as a means to solving problems of involuntary childlessness is limited to those couples who are able to afford it."

www.cafcass.gov.uk/download/3848/

yourhairiswinterfire · 23/09/2020 23:01

And it definitely adds up. I have a senior job and primark clothes are just not appropriate for my role. I spent about £1.2k on clothes shoes and underwear for during pregnancy and for after birth, until I fit back into my own clothes.

With respect though, many surrogate mothers aren't going to be the types of women in senior roles spending that much on clothes.

FannyCann · 23/09/2020 23:00

I have an itemised line by line breakdown which was good enough for the Family Court.

Family courts sign off whatever expenses are recorded. Sorry, for some reason I can't post screen shots just now, but the law Commission noted that whilst some people kept careful records of all their expenses, keeping receipts, others simply wrote "Expenses".

Try that on the tax man! Who incidentally may be interested in extra income of £20K. And if a woman is on benefits the benefit agency have a lower acceptance of what constitutes allowable expenses.

Anon992 · 23/09/2020 22:56

@NotBadConsidering We discussed ALL of your scenarios and many more when we developed our surrogacy agreement. I also took out life insurance (paid for by my IPs).

No pregnancy is risk free. Life is not risk free. We all take risks all the time - when we cross the road, get behind the wheel of the car.

FannyCann · 23/09/2020 22:55

If a surrogate is self employed with no sick pay/needs to take a significant period of time off work

If the surrogate mother is employed why should her employer paid for these expenses? Because she fancies having a baby for someone else. Women fought hard for maternity rights, in the UK we are much better off than some countries and much worse off than others. This isn't what was intended when legislating for maternity rights. Employers paying out for someone else to buy a baby. What if the woman is a repeat surrogate mother and does it many times? There is one woman in the UK, a legal secretary, who has had TEN surrogate babies.

Anon992 · 23/09/2020 22:50

@witchesaremysisters

1) Talk us through your life circumstances at the time you made this decision (how did it come about, what was your employment, did you have children/a partner of your own, who suggested what, and what was your socio-economic status at the time)?

Happily married, post grad educated, home owner, high earner, full time education, two primary school aged children. My partner, children and parents and I discussed the situation before I offered to be a surrogate for my friends by writing them a letter. All were very supportive. Enough detail for you? I also took legal advice, took out life insurance, amended my will, had GP checks, medical screening and counselling before commencing treatment.

2) How did you find the parents?

Long term friends (15 years)

Who did you give your baby to and why?

I find question this SO offensive. I did not 'give' 'my baby' to anyone. I carried a pregnancy for close friends.

Do you have any contact with the child?

Yes very frequently. We exchange pictures and messages several times a week. We meet up regularly (only 4 times this year though due to COVID and them living a long way away.)

Was there any friction between you and these parents?

No never

Were there any agencies involved?

Do you mean social services? No, other than that CAFCASS did the report to support the Parental Order Hearing. This is standard.

3) Did you provide your gamete as well as carry the child?

No it was gestational surrogacy.

What was the pregnancy/childbirth like, were there any complications during? What about now/later on?

Smooth and straightforward, as with my own children. I have had 3 labours, none longer than 6 hours, no tearing, no medical interventions. Never been in hospital for more than half a day.

4) What was your financial compensation? If you went through an agency/clinic of some description, how much money did they take?

I did not pay any money to an agency. My compensation is my business but I have an itemised line by line breakdown which was good enough for the Family Court.

5) Did you have a contract? What was it like? Who brokered it (was it a legal firm, for example)?

We had a surrogacy agreement. You cannot have a surrogacy contract in UK law. It was hugely helpful and comprehensive and independently facilitated by an experienced surrogate. It covered everything from antenatal tests, termination, announcing the birth, expenses, finding out the gender, planning the funeral.... a level of planning I never went into with my own pregnancies, but which ensured we were all aligned in our thinking before we started treatment.

Could you abort the foetus for any reason?

Of course

Could you keep the baby if you wanted to?

Why would I want to keep someone else's baby?? If I wanted another baby I would have had one with my husband!

Were there stipulations/restrictions on your activities?

No - we discussed things like alcohol consumption etc when developing our agreement but ultimately it was up to me. Surrogacy requires a very high level of trust and understanding between the parties.

What happened if you didn't comply with some part of the contract (e.g. missed a medical appointment, had an alcoholic drink)?

Not applicable. You are thinking of commercial surrogacy (which exists in other countries but not in the UK.)

6)What parts of your pregnancy/childbirth care was delivered by the NHS and what by the private sector?

Counselling, screening, embryo transfer at a private clinic along with viability scan. The rest through the NHS - usual scans. Straightforward delivery in an NHS hospital then home to bed for a good night's sleep!

7) What do you do in terms of surrogacy now?

I don't understand the question. I was a surrogate but it is only one part of who I am. Mainly I work and look after my children! I am very proud though of the happy family I helped to create.

Have you ever recommended to any of your friends/other women that they should also be surrogates?

No. It is such a personal choice. If I was asked I would advise anyone thinking about it does a huge amount of research and soul searching. It is certainly not for everyone and not something I would ever 'recommend' - but I don't tend to 'recommend' how other people should live their lives anyway.

Do you speak in professional or organisational settings about your experiences to people who might be "embarking on a surrogacy journey"?

No

NotBadConsidering · 23/09/2020 22:47

It seems that for altruistic surrogacy there are supporters, provided the mother is protected legally. But even then to cover all eventualities that raises many questions including financial:

What if the mother has severe hyperemesis gravidarum and is hospitalised several times and cannot work throughout pregnancy?

What if she suffers any other complication and cannot work? Do the intended parents compensate for loss of earnings? What if the woman has a husband who has to change his work to look after any other kids they might have? Is he compensated?

What if there is a chromosomal or genetic abnormality detected at 12 weeks and the intended parents don’t want the baby any more? Does protecting the surrogate mean continuing the pregnancy or aborting the fetus?

What if there is an abnormality that results in multiple interventions, such as amniocentesis for fluid removal for a condition causing polyhydramnios? Or Rhesus disease leading to the need for fetal transfusions?

What if there are twins? What if one has a severe abnormality and requires selective reduction? Is she still compensated for a twin pregnancy, or only up until the fetus is terminated?

What if the mother has a caesarean and can’t drive for 6 weeks after? Will she still be compensated?

What if the mother suffers a pulmonary embolism and requires 6 months of anti-coagulation and ongoing doctors visits? Will they be compensated?

What if she suffers a stroke and has lifelong disability requiring loss of work in herself, and a partner she may have? Will she be compensated for life?

If the intended parents can’t cover that cost financially, will any insurance company?

What if the baby has a lifelong disability and the intended parents don’t want to take the baby home. What protection should be in place? Is the mother legally protected from not having to take the baby? Is a legal framework going to exist the guarantees the baby will go into care?Hmm

These are just some scenarios that happen daily in some pregnancies or occasionally, or rarely. All of these scenarios I have come across in real life.

How on earth can you legislate for all of this? You. Just. Can’t.

Which is why the only way altruistic surrogacy ever works is that all the parties involved cross their fingers and hope nothing goes wrong and breathe a huge sigh of relief when it doesn’t and everything ends up peachy. But the reality is that it’s inevitable that even in the most altruistic of situations, something will go wrong.

So I’ll be interested to hear how those in favour plan to deal with that, legally.

OP posts:
Dozer · 23/09/2020 22:41

It’s de facto commercial in the UK already, with the high ‘expenses’.

FannyCann · 23/09/2020 22:40

Whoops. Forgot the screen shots.

FannyCann · 23/09/2020 22:38

Regarding "altruistic" surrogacy, the Law Commission recognised that lots of people make money off the back of surrogacy - lawyers, agencies, doctors and private IVF clinics. The woman,uniquely, is expected to do it all for free ...which could seem a little, er, exploitative.

So they are tying themselves in knots to come up with a legal fiction that the UK does not have commercial surrogacy, however surrogates are rewarded for their trouble, but it is only "expenses".

Anyone else spend £20k on being pregnant? ( No buying cots, buggies and nappies as there will be no baby. No paying medical expenses as that falls to the commissioning parents). Just the cost of being pregnant for nine months. 🤷‍♀️

NotBadConsidering · 23/09/2020 22:27

So many great posts here.

To update, I would say generally to anyone from Twitter who is casually observing this thread that it’s a perfectly legitimate topic to discuss and people on Twitter don’t generally get to police what happens here, just so you know. Hmm Thanks to MNHQ for allowing this general discussion.

There also seems to be a general belief that surrogacy doesn’t result in babies being removed immediately from the mother and posted on Instagram but I’m always reminded of this case, with its photo, arms aloft, posted on Instagram:

evoke.ie/2019/10/25/showbiz/mark-feehily-opens-up-about-surrogacy-and-shares-first-video-of-newborn-baby

OP posts:
Anon992 · 23/09/2020 22:27

Sorry but there is no way that pregnancy alone (where you don't have to buy anything at all for the baby itself) comes close to costing 15 grand.

Firstly - I assume (correct me if I am wrong) that you did not add up the costs of your pregnancy (or separately itemise them on a spreadsheet and keep all your receipts). I did. I can tell you to the penny what mine cost. And it definitely adds up. I have a senior job and primark clothes are just not appropriate for my role. I spent about £1.2k on clothes shoes and underwear for during pregnancy and for after birth, until I fit back into my own clothes. Bras, tights, leggings, shoes (my feet swelled). Pregnancy pillow, birthing ball, parking at the hospital, travel costs. It adds up.

The biggest expenses that surrogates incur are often loss of earnings. That was certainly the case for us. My partner took 2 weeks of unpaid leave (not entitled to paternity leave for obvious reasons) to look after me and our existing children immediately after birth. That was £3k straight off.

If a surrogate is self employed with no sick pay/needs to take a significant period of time off work (e.g. if she has HG) then I can easily seen how expenses would reach this value.