Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Irish women, have you seen this?

419 replies

SecondRow · 17/09/2020 08:23

The HSE removed the word "woman" from their CERVICAL screening pages Angry
I stumbled across this tweet
twitter.com/Salwicklow/status/1305967737563422720?s=20

politely asking them to put woman back in, alongside trans men and trans women, who both get their own special mentions, but they have brushed off the woman who made the original request and are no longer replying.

Here's the HSE pages
www2.hse.ie/screening-and-vaccinations/cervical-screening/when-you-should-have-cervical-screening/who-should-have-cervical-screening.html

And here's Aoife Martin - no cervix skin in the game Hmm inviting followers to mock women for wanting the 99.9% of people who need cervical screening to be named as such by a health service that already has some serious catching up to do before women can believe it has their best interests at heart.

twitter.com/aoifemrtn/status/1306339571790159872?s=20

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
OchonAgusOchonO · 04/10/2020 13:13

@ForeverFaithless - Given the way things are moving I'm going to respond to the IHREC again and ask if I can target my services to 'women with a cervix'. This would purposely exclude any man who identifies as a woman.

I would target women, and others, with a cervix. The second comma is very important as it means women with a cervix and others with a cervix (you probably know that anyway but no harm pointing it out). That's assuming you don't have an issue treating transmen.

SecondRow · 04/10/2020 12:56

Yep 3timeslucky, we have to make ourselves a thorn in their sides. I wonder if the newly formed women's groups will get affiliated/recognized by the NWCI?

OP posts:
ForeverFaithless · 04/10/2020 12:31

I don't like that this excludes women who have had their cervix removed but it seems to be the only way not to get sued.

It may also exclude transmen but my understanding is that many would not be able to avail of acupuncture /reflexology /massage (possibly other alternative therapies) as taking medication can be seen as a serious contraindication to treatment.

Annasgirl · 04/10/2020 12:19

@ForeverFaithless

Given the way things are moving I'm going to respond to the IHREC again and ask if I can target my services to 'women with a cervix'. This would purposely exclude any man who identifies as a woman.
Great idea!!!
ForeverFaithless · 04/10/2020 12:16

Given the way things are moving I'm going to respond to the IHREC again and ask if I can target my services to 'women with a cervix'. This would purposely exclude any man who identifies as a woman.

3timeslucky · 04/10/2020 12:10

Thanks for that update Annasgirl. Maybe there really is value in on-goingly prompting the NWCI to remember what the W stands for. Maybe it would be a step too far for them to challenge the situation in Limerick Prison but if they are there to represent the interests of women then surely the safety of those prisoners should be on their agenda?

Heartening also to see Roisin tweet the Jenni Murray article.

Annasgirl · 04/10/2020 11:54

Alert

The Sunday Times report that the National Women's Council of Ireland have requested the HSE replace their new wording on the Cervical Cancer information to state "women, girls and anyone with a cervix".

The NWCI are meeting with the HSE and TENI to discuss - now while I do not support the inclusion of TENI in this, I guess they are not going to go the whole hog in the current climate.

It is on page 5 of the main paper. Well done ladies, keep up the good fight, this whole thing has opened up a shocking can of worms where we realise how badly we have been shafted by the GRA. It also references Sarah Anderson - shout out of you are here Sarah, well done for getting this the publicity it required.

SecondRow · 04/10/2020 11:43

twitter.com/roisiningle/status/1312690015881887744?s=20

OP posts:
SecondRow · 04/10/2020 11:43

Didn't know which thread to put this on so sorry if
off topic.

Rosin Ingle tweets Jenni Murray article Grin

Imagine the confusion of her followers? How to respond wokely? Confused

OP posts:
OchonAgusOchonO · 04/10/2020 11:11

@Porridgeoat - I’d love to know who they did their extensive testing with. Did they spell out the implications of not using the word woman, that some women. won’t know what a cervix is or that women’s services are being eroded.

I have asked who they did their testing with and how they conducted it. I'm still waiting on a reply.

Porridgeoat · 04/10/2020 09:52

This outcome would make me question core research’s approach to researching. They should have started the questionnaire with which sex has a cervix? Then where is you cervix? What does your cervix do? They should have also checked the understanding of the phrase ‘people with a cervix’ and the understanding of which groups this applies to. That would have picked up the comprehension issue immediately. Next they should have a question about removing the word women completely from literature and if this was negative or positive for females.

SecondRow · 04/10/2020 09:14

The market research company Core Research is mentioned as having been involved in coming up with the new wording. I wonder if they still have a copy of the "extensive testing" lying around that the HSE so carelessly mislaid?

OP posts:
XXSex · 04/10/2020 08:18

[quote GrainneMhaol]www.thetimes.co.uk/article/national-womens-council-of-ireland-to-hse-change-anyone-with-a-cervix-advice-wvblnmplt[/quote]
I was coming on to post this too! This shit show has made the British papers. The NWCI seem to be taking the right approach to this too. Is it too much to hope that they’ve seen the light?

BrandineDelRoy · 04/10/2020 04:34

Sorry. I see now you've already gotten a canned response. 😕

BrandineDelRoy · 04/10/2020 04:31

@ForeverFaithless

I have received an email response from the IHREC, I will post the complete details later.

Annasgirl - the GRA legislation supersedes the sex based rights of the Equality Act

I realize your response has already been sent (and it was very good). But I was wondering if one should inquire if guidance uses the literal equivalent of "people with a cervix" when translating to languages other than English-- or if they stick with "women." If the former, I would ask if there were studies done in the other languages. If the latter, I'd wonder why.
Porridgeoat · 04/10/2020 02:35

I’d love to know who they did their extensive testing with. Did they spell out the implications of not using the word woman, that some women. won’t know what a cervix is or that women’s services are being eroded.

MarDhea · 03/10/2020 09:55

"Vulval waxing"

"Nonorchidal depilation"

SecondRow · 03/10/2020 09:43

Yes, it's risky for anyone offering services and ironically brings us back around to possibly having to advertise a service as being for "people with... I don't know... labia?!"

OP posts:
MarDhea · 03/10/2020 08:17

@SecondRow

Two cases of bridal shops wanting to keep men out. Two cases of barbers wanting to keep women out.

Doesn't fully answer your question Forever or does it? Surely it should be possible to draw boundaries on sex grounds for services more intimate than hairdressing?

Yes I think intimate services would be able to use the exemption legitimately, but it will take a legal case to settle it by establishing a precedent.

That latter barber shop case - I remember it at the time, where a transman with a GRC was turned away from a barbers, and the barbers said they thought the person in question was a woman not a transman. The transman won the case of discrimination on grounds of gender = transgender, not gender = male.

The three different gender categories in the equal status act (male, female, transgender) mean that transman does not equal male and transwoman does not equal female in equality law. A lawyer friend of mine thinks that in some ways, that makes the exemption easier to apply, and a waxmyballs situation would find in favour of the beautician.

But until a case comes to tribunal, it's all hypothetical...

ForeverFaithless · 02/10/2020 23:01

SecondRow - what I take from the email is that another WaxMyBalls is going to make an appearance in Ireland and make life a misery for small business women here

swingsandroundabouts1 · 02/10/2020 20:53

*"from the date of that issue become for all purposes the preferred gender so that if the preferred gender is the male gender the person’s sex becomes that of a man, and if it is the female gender the person’s sex becomes that of a woman."

According to the Act once you change gender you change sex. Genitalia doesn't matter. I cannot believe Irish politians voted for this.

SecondRow · 02/10/2020 20:09

Two cases of bridal shops wanting to keep men out. Two cases of barbers wanting to keep women out.

Doesn't fully answer your question Forever or does it? Surely it should be possible to draw boundaries on sex grounds for services more intimate than hairdressing?

OP posts:
swingsandroundabouts1 · 02/10/2020 18:53

My point was.that for example, if a woman went into a toilet to get away from some creepy guy, the security guard would be put in a very difficult position. If the creepy guy says I am a woman the security guard cannot ask for evidence.
So they put every safeguard in for trans people and none for women

seadreaming2020 · 02/10/2020 18:46

There is self I’d in Ireland anyway so not sure asking for a GRC would hold any water. They have really messed up in Ireland and is one of the reasons I am hesitant about moving back there - women’s rights have take a huge step backwards - and what’s worse is people are afraid to even discuss.