@Quaagars
I don't think this is about transmen. It's about not pissing off transwomen who cant menstruate so don't want the word woman associated with a biological function of which they are incapable
Well, that's a load of speculative guff based on nothing but I can assume prejudice/hatred/ignorance/a mix of all three, take your pick.
It's being inclusive towards trans men, but hey, go ahead and ignore them and that fact if it makes you feel better/ validates your "it's all about the trans women!" narrative
The problem with being inclusive towards trans men is that it is based on the implicit assumption that
everyone's gender identities are detached from the sex of their bodies. Then it indeed would be weird to mention 'women' in the context of menstruation and not the other genders (men and nonbinary) which also contain people who menstruate.
But I do not believe that the vast majority of those who reckon themselves to be women actually have such a detached female gender identity. Rather, that identity (or definition of one's gender) is very much based on the fact of living in a female body and how others react to us differently because of that body rather than a male one.
When that is the case, the kind of inclusiveness towards trans men actually means that all women who use the sex-based definition of their female gender just got that definition completely invalidated by being told that the female body is now gender-neutral.
This clash of interests is real, in my opinion, and a direct consequence of the re-purposing of 'woman' rather than the creation of some new terms for abstract gender identities that people might wish to have.